At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
A lengthy reply that doesn't match the reality. I'm still never going to buy your wheels after the posts from a fellow Outcasts Cycling member in...
It wouldn't matter if it was made last week in China out of plastic: it's still a good enough reason to deny cyclists safer roads.
The scene 100 years ago. The rise of mass motoring occupies the same time frame as the decline of the British seaside resort. ...
That's a possibility. But if that were the case, it wouldn't explain how I still get it on Zwift where Garmin wasn't even in play. The power from...
Car crashes into lifting bridge ...
They should bring back dog tax, sorry dog licences. That would fix everything, [sic].
Aren't 4*4 supposed to go off road?
Not cycling, but, still......
Until I saw the words "stationary bikes only" on the clip body, it was registering as a stupid idea (anyone who watches cycle-cross will know the...
I think I've heard the phrase "I'm quitting Reform and will discuss the reasons why in due course" - either due course never comes, or it does, but...