At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Yes, exactly this....
A bit obvious but have you tried switching to ANT+ instead of Bluetooth?
Sammy Hagar . . . .
That's harsh and too draconian. A thumb would do. Holding an angle grinder would be tricky without thumbs.
I generally spend the month avoiding online news including road CC until I have seen the highlights for the day.
Victory is mine!...
The Good:...
So, does Simmons get 4 points now for being second in the KOM/Polka race?
Nope, distinct license types and competence. Balance Bikes, Penny Farthings and Time Trials are all cycles, so no distinction there...
I never follow the instructions to the book. I always use less than recommended.