A mountain biker is suing Specialized for damages after he was injured while riding the brand’s Turbo Levo e-mountain bike, the crash allegedly caused by a motor defect known to the American company.
According to a lawsuit filed last week in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, cyclist Steve Ruggiero was riding the Turbo Levo on the Alpine Trail in Oakridge, Oregon, when he crashed due to an unexpected acceleration, breaking seven ribs, Bicycle Retailer and Industry News reports.
Ruggiero’s suit claims that the crash was caused by issues surrounding the bike’s motor overrun, the pushing force an e-bike continues to provide after the rider removes pressure from the pedals, offering assistance for a brief set spell in order to maintain momentum.
On older or less expensive e-bikes, this overrun is often unintentional and a result of less advanced software or sensors, making the bike harder to control. But, as is the case with some other high-performance electric mountain bikes, overrun is incorporated into the design of the Turbo Levo.
On the new £12,500 S-Works Turbo Levo 4, for example, overrun is an adjustable feature that can be set to differing periods of assistance after a rider stops pedalling.
The lawsuit filed by Ruggiero alleges that issues with the Turbo Levo’s overrun can also cause the motor to provide more assistance than expected, at unexpected times, in any chosen setting.
> Cyclist sues Shimano and Trek for $2 million after brake lever “impaled” foot-long wound in thigh
In the suit, the mountain biker says he was riding down a steep descent on the Alpine Trail in ‘eco’ mode before decelerating over a long flat section of loose shale. He then hit a section of loam soil, at which point his rear wheel “spun out, due to the manufacturing flaw”.
Ruggiero says issues with the bike’s overrun caused it to accelerate at a faster rate than normally found in eco mode, resulting in the wheel receiving excessive power. He then lost control of the bike and crashed, hearing the sound of ribs cracking as he hit the ground.
The lawsuit states: “When he opened his eyes and looked back, he saw the Turbo Levo on its side with a long J-shaped rut spun into the dirt where the rear wheel had suddenly accelerated and spun while driving him into the hillside.”
A few days after the crash, Ruggiero went to an urgent care clinic for x-rays, which came back negative, but after waking that night in more pain, and fearing internal injuries, paramedics were called and he was taken to a local hospital.
There, he was diagnosed with seven broken ribs on his left side but no other internal injuries. He remained in hospital for three days receiving treatment. According to his lawsuit, Ruggiero claims his recovery from the crash has been a slow one, and that he has just started to resume physical activity, but isn’t sure if he’ll be able to return to his “previous level”.
> Cyclist paralysed in crash to sue Planet X insurers for £10 million
In the lawsuit, the cyclist alleges that Specialized have been aware of the design flaw which caused the crash for several years, the issue being discussed on several online mountain bike forums since 2017.
The suit also states that overrun problems on the Turbo Levo are still being brought up by forum users, with a number of these comments included in the complaint.
Ruggiero has asked for a jury trial and the awarding of general and specific damages, to be determined by the court, along with punitive damages, costs and fees, and “any further relief that the court determines proper”. No specific amounts have yet been claimed.

13 thoughts on “Specialized sued by mountain biker after serious e-bike crash was allegedly caused by known motor defect”
I seem to recall there being
I seem to recall there being a problem in the USA – and only the USA – with ‘unitended acceleration’ on Audis.
Basically, Americans were putting their feet on the wrong pedal.
I seem to recall there being
I seem to recall there being a problem in the USA – and only the USA – with ‘unintended acceleration’ on Audis
In 88/89 I was working in the US. There was then a spate of stories about Sudden Unexplained Acceleration Incidents (which were, of course, due to pressing the wrong pedal) but at that time the ‘sufferers’ were said to be drivers of Medicare Sleds (Mercury, or Lincolns, basically huge machines only suitable for going in a straight line and driven by Old Knackers) rather than Rice Rockets (the phrase describing the Japanese cars driven by younger people). This Audi story must be a later version of the same thing. Now we have it in the UK with over-powered two-pedal Electric Panzers, and I saw one hurtle across a car park and destroy the Garstang men’s toilets a couple of years ago – if anybody had been in the way, he’d be dead. All over in 2 seconds, but with airbags the occupants stepped out unharmed
An e-biker complaining ?
An e-biker complaining ?
“Won’t get back to his
“Won’t get back to his previous level” don’t worry dude. Just buy a bike with the same power output and you’re there.
leedorney wrote:
And if his complaint has any substance to it, why shouldn’t he? Wouldn’t you complain if a defect on your bike made you crash and caused you serious injuries?
What a nonsense. Anything for
What a nonsense. Anything for a bit of compensation for their own failure.
“He then lost control of the
“He then lost control of the bike and crashed, hearing the sound of ribs cracking as he hit the ground…
“…A few days after the crash, Ruggiero went to an urgent care clinic for x-rays”
He HEARD his own ribs cracking, but didn’t see a doctor until a few days later? Sounds like negligence on his part.
“x-rays, which came back negative … after waking that night in more pain, and fearing internal injuries, paramedics were called and he was taken to a local hospital. There, he was diagnosed with seven broken ribs”
And maybe medical negligence/incompetence by the urgent care clinic.
To me, it sounds like an
To me, it sounds like an American who didn’t get healthcare, because it’s very expensive and profiteering.
Ah yes, the American health
Ah yes, the American health care system is such a mess a real-estate agent living on Bainbridge Island, where the average house costs $1.2 million, can’t afford to go see a doctor. Why does someone on road.cc stray into politics about which they know little?
cmedred wrote:
Nothing on here or in the linked report says he is a real estate agent, you can only find that by Googling his name and seeing his Linkedin profile (assuming it’s the same person, which given the American penchant for passing the same name down through generations is by no means guaranteed). Does everyone have to research every aspect of every story fully before commenting on it or can they just go on the facts as presented?
Was he cited for the trail
Was he cited for the trail damage? Those spinning tires on e-bikes are a whole new problem on some U.S. trails that you never saw before the Ruggieros of the world went e-moto.
overrun is incorporated into
overrun is incorporated into the design of the Turbo Levo…On the new £12,500 S-Works Turbo Levo 4, for example, overrun is an adjustable feature that can be set to differing periods of assistance after a rider stops pedalling
My uninformed guess is that the default is ‘0 seconds assistance after you stop pedalling’ and that to exit the default you have to agree to a disclaimer that ‘persistent assistance’ can lead to problems and thus accept the responsibility yourself. If this ‘fault’ (my equally uninformed suspicion is that it’s not a fault at all, but a customisation feature) has been known for 8 years at least, Specialized and its litigation-sensitive lawyers would have sorted it out by now. Therefore, I think this litigant is trying his luck in the hope of frightening the big boys (just like Strava v. Garmin) over ‘bad publicity’ and I hope the case is thrown out. Of course, my suspicions may be wrong and this is a genuine Sudden Unexplained Acceleration Incident which is the fault of Specialized.
Book of Racing Excuses… No.
Book of Racing Excuses… No. 135