London Marathon Events, the company behind the annual RideLondon cycling festival, has confirmed that the company’s chair, Terence Duddy, has resigned from its board, as well as its charitable foundation, following his conviction for careless driving, in relation to a collision which left a female cyclist seriously injured.
Duddy, who last month was also appointed as chair of BBC Children in Need, a post from which he has since resigned, was handed an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for a year and a half, and banned from driving for 18 months following the incident, which left a woman in her 50s with serious injuries.
The 69-year-old was driving his BMW SUV in the village of Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, in June when he cut across the opposite lane and into the path of the oncoming cyclist, striking her and sending her flying over her handlebars.
road.cc approached Thames Valley Police last week for an update on the injured cyclist’s condition, but were told by the force that the rider, who is “recovering”, did not wish to provide any further details.
Sharing video footage of the collision, Thames Valley Police also confirmed that Duddy was ordered by a judge to undertake 200 hours of unpaid work and pay costs totalling £272.
The conviction prompted Duddy to resign from his new role as chair of BBC Children in Need. His appointment as the charity’s chair was only confirmed last month, by which time Duddy would have already received his court date, raising questions as to the scrutiny that went into his appointment.
Duddy, a former boss of Argos and Homebase’s parent company, is credited with ‘inventing’ click and collect catalogue ordering. He stepped down as Chief Executive in 2013 amid growing scrutiny of his £1.6 million salary.
Since then, he has chaired the board of welfare charity Catch 22 and London Marathon Events, the latter being the organiser of the RideLondon sportive that last took place in 2024.
Duddy was appointed to London Marathan Events’ board of directors in December 2020, when he was also appointed as a trustee and director of the London Marathon Foundation, the company’s charitable trust.
As well as the currently paused RideLondon cycling festival, which between 2013 and 2024 featured sportives, family rides, and elite racing around the streets of the capital and the surrounding countryside, London Marathon Events also organises, as the name suggests, the London and Brighton marathons and the London T100 Triathlon.

Last Wednesday, we reported that Duddy’s resignation from his role at Children in Need was confirmed to staff that morning, just days after this year’s telethon fundraising appeal raised £45.5 million. He had been due to join the Board of Trustees on Friday and would have led the process for appointing a new chief executive of the charity.
Children in Need told road.cc that it did not know about Duddy’s legal troubles prior to his appointment.
And now, it has been confirmed that Duddy has also stepped down from his roles at London Marathon Events and Catch 22, after both organisations confirmed last week that they were investigating the matter “as a matter of priority”.
“The trustees of the London Marathon Foundation have accepted the resignation of Terry Duddy from the boards of the Foundation and London Marathon Events,” London Marathon Events said in a statement issued on Monday.
“We extend our sincere thanks to Terry for his commitment and contributions over the past five years.”
According to an update on Companies House, Catch 22, a not-for-profit ‘social business’, has also “terminated” Duddy’s position on its board of directors.
Duddy’s resignation following his careless driving conviction comes amid a wall of silence surrounding the future of LME’s RideLondon event, the annual cycling festival held in the capital and around Essex to celebrate the legacy of the 2012 Olympics.
RideLondon was last held in 2024 after London Marathon Events cancelled the 2025 event, claiming that a “hiatus” would allow them to return with “new concept” to involve “more riders of all ages and abilities”.
The 2024 edition of RideLondon, the event’s tenth, included the three-day Women’s UCI World Tour RideLondon Classique race (which was also cancelled for 2025), mass participation rides over 100 miles, 60 miles, and 30 miles incorporating a loop of Essex, and FreeCycle, a seven-mile traffic-free route through central London for cyclists of all abilities.
However, putting a halt to the festivities for 2025, and announcing that all entrants who had registered early for next year’s event will receive a full refund, the event’s organisers announced in September 2024 that change was needed for the “world’s greatest festival of cycling” in the future.

“We feel the time is right to take a pause this year and bring all stakeholders together to work on a new concept for the world’s greatest festival of cycling,” Hugh Brasher, the CEO of London Marathon Events, said at the time.
“We have now staged 10 hugely successful editions of the event which has inspired more than 300,000 people to get back on a bike or cycle more and also raised more than £85 million for charity.
“No event in 2025 means that we can focus on a full strategic review of RideLondon, which was first held as a London 2012 Olympic legacy event back in 2013, and design a new concept which will engage more riders of all ages and abilities and inspire hundreds of thousands more people to cycle more often.”

23 thoughts on “RideLondon cycling event boss resigns from board after careless driving conviction for seriously injuring cyclist”
Given that he, quite rightly
Given that he, quite rightly as not a leg to stand on, pleaded guilty it would be quite nice if alongside these third-party resignation confirmations Duddy actually put out a statement apologising for the harm he caused the lady in question.
Trolly, trolly, troll…
Trolly, trolly, troll…
Apologising is cheap. More
Apologising is cheap. More importantly, he should offer a fat envelope to help cover her medical and rehab fees.
Inevitable outcome, but
Inevitable outcome, but welcome.
No ridiculous, the fact he os
No ridiculous, the fact he is on a driving ban has nothing to do with his ability to do these roles given his extensive executive experience
You don’t have to have a 4
You don’t have to have a 4 letter username with no vowels but consistent capitalisation to argue here, but it helps.
SVXY wrote:
There’s no character limit on posts on road.cc you know, you could also include alongside the driving ban the suspended prison sentence for a serious criminal offence resulting in severe injury to a third party, or did it just slip your mind? Oddly enough companies don’t like having convicted criminals on their boards as a rule, particularly when the crime committed was one that involved inflicting serious injury on one of the group of people whom they attempt to serve.
This was an offence which
This was an offence which until 2023 would have had a maximum sentence of a fine and penalty points and not even a mandatory driving ban. Even now Mr Duddy was only sentenced in the magistrates court not the Crown Court. It was not a serious criminal offence, he was not speeding, not drunk, not on his phone and no sign forbade right turns. Had he hit a driver rather than the cyclist doing the same thing the driver would likely have been uninjured.
There are plenty of boards who have those with spent minor criminal convictions on their boards and I expect Duddy will be back in a few years with some executive roles once his conviction is spent. Even the President of the United States has a criminal record for a more serious offence than this one
SVXY wrote:
It’s an offence which involved serious injury to a third party and which carries a maximum sentence of two years in prison. He was sentenced to prison, albeit suspended. How serious does something have to be before you call it serious?
To quote Richard Dawkins, so fucking what? If whilst riding my bicycle I carelessly knock down an octogenarian and break their legs can I plead in mitigation that if they’d been a twenty-five-year-old sixteen-stone rugby player they probably wouldn’t even have fallen down?
It is an offence which was
It is an offence which was tried in the Magistrates Court with other minor offences not the Crown Court. It is an offence which before 2023 would have had a maximum sentence of a fine and penalty points and not even a mandatory driving ban. It was not a very serious offence and had Mr Duddy hit a driver rather than a cyclist doing the same offence the driver would likely have had no injuries at all.
if you had been a cyclist who knocked down an octogenarian pedestrian and broke their legs you could not even have been charged with careless cycling causing serious injury as there is now one law for drivers and another for cyclists who cause injury. At most you could have been charged with wanton and furious cycling which is a 19th century offence and carries a higher threshold to prove
SVXY wrote:
You’re getting desperate now. Well, more desperate. Causing injury by careless driving is an either-way offence that can be tried in a Magistrates’ Court or a Crown Court. Do you think burglary, ABH, possession of drugs with intent to supply, possession of indecent sexual images, selling firearms to people who don’t have a licence for them, cruelty to or neglect of children and sexual assault on a child under the age of 13 are all minor offences? Because all of those are examples of either-way offences that can be tried by magistrates. Just because an offence is tried in a Magistrates’ Court doesn’t make it “minor”.
Yes so not an indictable
Yes so not an indictable offence that can only be tried in the Crown Court and in this case was tried in the Magistrates Court. All the offences you mentioned have always been tried as either way offences, careless driving causing injury was just a summary only offence until 2023 that could only be tried in the Magistrates Court. Also as I said the law must also now be changed by Parliament so cyclists who cause serious injury to pedestrians can be charged with an either way careless driving causing serious injuries offence just like drivers now can
SVXY wrote:
Yes, and you tried to play down the seriousness of the offence by saying that it, and I quote, “was tried in the Magistrates Court with other minor offences” as if seriously injuring someone is a minor offence. The list of offences that can be tried in a Magistrates’ Court that I gave you (which is by no means exhaustive) demonstrates that just because something is tried in a Magistrates’ Court that does not make it a minor offence. As for your continual harping on the fact that the law used to be different, again I must say so fucking what? The law as it stands now is, quite rightly, that injuring somebody through careless driving is a very serious criminal offence that attracts a prison sentence and that is what Duddy quite rightly received.
Just out of curiosity, seeing as you have only turned up to troll this thread and as far as I know have never contributed anything to these pages before, do you actually ride a bike or are you simply here to defend criminal drivers?
As I said it was not a very
As I said it was not a very serious offence, was tried in the Magistrates Court only and would have been a summary only offence until 2023. All the offences you gave me had always been either way offences so were more serious than this offence would have been. The law as it is now has gone too far for this offence, it should have been a driving ban maximum and a potential prison sentence for it is totally out of proportion for drivers who were not speeding, not over the drink drive limit and not on their phone and where no sign forbade the maneouvre (though Duddy only received a suspended not immediate prison sentence anyway). I occasionally ride bikes but not on main roads, as I said cyclists who injure pedestrians should also now face an either way serious injury by careless driving charge just as drivers who injure when driving carelessly now do
Well tough, that’s the law
Well tough, that’s the law and he’s been given the correct penalty for the criminal offence of seriously injuring someone else through his carelessness. However much you bore on repeating the same utter nonsense on here that’s not going to change. Now, as you clearly have no interest in cycling apart from having a go at cyclists and defending criminal drivers who injure them, how about toddling off back to Petrolheads and the Daily Mail where this sort of drivel will find a warm welcome?
It may be the law but I don’t
It may be the law but I don’t have to agree with the penalty, which should have been raised to a maximum of a driving ban for this offence. Just because I also sometimes comment on Mailonline does not stop me occasionally commenting on here either
SVXY wrote:
It’s more a question of his character though. It’s clearly lacking and we don’t want more selfish, inconsiderate executives screwing over everyone else.
He was a very competent CEO
He was a very competent CEO of a FTSE 250 company for years
And a very obvious
And a very obvious incompetent driver.
No ridiculous, he is on a
No ridiculous, he is on a driving ban but still with extensive executive experience for roles like this
Actually, no, it doesn’t help
Actually, no, it doesn’t help.
It looks like Terence Duddy
It looks like Terence Duddy is somebody who has dedicated a lot of time to supporting events over the past few years.
However, I agree that, regardless of his intentions, this act is resignation material in the context of providing leadership to cycling events.
Surely anyone who drives a
Surely anyone who drives a BMW wankpanzer has demonstrated such a profound lack of responsibility sufficient to bar them from any position of authority.