A driver who killed a cyclist in Exeter after running a red light as he inhaled laughing gas from behind the wheel of his BMW has been sentenced to three years in prison and a driving ban that will see him disqualified for an additional two years following his release. Harry Lock admitted causing the death of Maria Perez-Gonzalez, and an active travel campaigner who attended the sentencing claims police were “appalled” and the family “distraught” by the “perverse” sentence, with an appeal set to be lodged.
Lock, 24, left an Exeter pub on the evening of 7th August 2021 to return home to Plymouth alongside a passenger in his front seat. Lock stopped his BMW 4 Series briefly to retrieve laughing gas cannisters from his boot, continuing to use it as he drove.
Despite ignoring requests from his passenger to stop inhaling the substance, Lock continued, and drove through a red light on Western Way in Exeter. It was here that Lock hit 53-year-old Miss Perez-Gonzalez, a mother-of-three, who was attempting to cross the road on her bike. The healthcare assistant died from her injuries two days later.
In his initial police interview, Lock claimed the traffic light had been green; however, small details from CCTV footage proved that the light was red when Lock drove over the junction, and had been for seven seconds.
Warning: upsetting content
Miss Perez-Gonzalez’s family agreed for footage of the incident (above) to be released, “in the hope it will warn other motorists of the tragic consequences of dangerous driving” according to Devon and Cornwall Police.
Sergeant Troy Bennett, of Devon and Cornwall Police’s Serious Collisions Investigation Team, commented: “Harry Lock’s dangerous actions on the evening of 7 August 2021, where he drove while using nitrous oxide and contravened a red traffic light, had catastrophic and fatal consequences.
“Those tragic consequences are felt by the family of Maria Perez-Gonzalez to this day as they continue to mourn her loss.
“As Lock starts his sentence, he can reflect on his poor choices that evening.
“Driving while impaired is one of the ‘fatal five’ most dangerous driving behaviours that often contribute to fatal or serious road traffic collisions.
“I urge all those who get behind the wheel to ensure they never drive while under the influence of alcohol or drugs and that they drive carefully.”
A statement on behalf of Miss Perez-Gonzalez’s children said: “Maria Perez-Gonzalez was a loving, caring mum to Edgar, Chris and Jorge who desperately miss her.
“She was an incredible person who accomplished amazing things in life, who was going to achieve so much more. A year away from reuniting with her oldest son, Edgar, after 20 years. She was a remarkable woman that helped whoever surrounded her.
“She had been through difficult times but always stayed positive, even in the face of the extreme adversity, testament to her strength and courage. She was a health care assistant at the RD&E, just about to embark on university nursing course before she was so cruelly taken.”
Caspar Hughes, an active travel campaigner who attended the sentencing, claims the family were distraught and police officers involved in the investigations were “appalled” by the sentencing, with one arguing that the crime should have been considered a Category A offence.
Hughes added: “Currently the family and police want to appeal, if they go ahead they’ll lodge an appeal early next week.
“With regard to the driving ban, [Lock] should be banned for life, to keep the roads safer for us all. But that isn’t possible under our current law.
“This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias.
“We need bench trials with specially trained judges to hear these cases.”




















46 thoughts on “Police “appalled” by sentence of driver who ran red light and killed cyclist as he inhaled laughing gas”
“This killer driver was
“This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias.”
This, a thousand times this.
This relatively lenient sentence is far from being an aberation, and is quite in line with other penalties for similar offences, but that is just motornormativity in action: it’s still obscene.
plus a dose of the justice
plus a dose of the justice system and police being institutionally anti-cyclist
Is says in the article that
Is says in the article that the police were shocked by the sentence and may appeal.
The police reaction to the
The police reaction to the sentence highlights concerns about its perceived leniency. While the legal system ensures fairness, their intent to appeal suggests a belief that justice may not have been fully served. An appeal could provide an opportunity to reassess the case and ensure public confidence in the outcome.
Absolutely correct. Specially
Absolutely correct. Specially trained judges & juries(?) are needed to ensure drivers who kill or seriously injure get an appropriate punishment .
“This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias.”
This, a thousand times this.
This relatively lenient sentence is far from being an aberation, and is quite in line with other penalties for similar offences, but that is just motornormativity in action: it’s still obscene.— eburtthebike
Consuming an anesthetic gas
Consuming an anesthetic gas while driving? WTF?
I’m not well-versed in what the kids are doing these days, but as I understand it as well as being a giggle this drug is associated not just with “slower reaction times” but unconsciousness.
Seems to me a step beyond “I was so stoned I didn’t notice that the lights had changed”. Although it does say his companion suggested he give it a rest.
I wonder – did the decades of anti drink-driving campaigns really succeed, or is it just that social mores have moved on to acceptability of different patterns of drug use?
Talking of – “left the pub and got into the driver’s seat”. Presumably this was checked out by police? Or maybe “has admitted to the drugs, that will do for a charge”.
Since this was a reckless
Since this was a reckless idiot hitting someone trying to cross the road no doubt Mr. Briggs will be interested (sorry…)
Also we can see how the legal system sensibly adapts itself to circumstances, not just outcomes (as noted in the case of Auriol Gray – if not for the fact that the cyclist died the appeal judge couldn’t imagine the charge being brought etc.). So: doctor (implicitly) admits killing someone by not looking before driving across a junction – no charge. Driver somehow doesn’t manage to kill two cyclists at a roundabout, pleads guilty – ten months. Another driver ignores give way markings, by chance doesn’t manage to kill someone, pleads guilty – twelve months….
Now – there are important differences in all those, but it does seem like there are some guidelines for “otherwise law abiding” drivers caught out by a moment of madness. Try to be a “respectable member of society”, if you’re going to tell some lies stick to “I looked but honestly did not see them” or “I cannot remember”. And don’t lose heart if you’ve got smashed or were speeding – the latter’s definitely excusable and it seems the former is increasingly so.
Waiting for mark Harper to
Waiting for mark Harper to legislate on this supported by Briggs
You think this sentence is
You think this sentence is bad, it’s a lot better than 20+ years ago.
I remember reading a report in Cycling Weekly about 25 years ago. A schoolboy approx. 12 yrs old, was killed while cycling home from school. I think this may have been in New Addington, near Croydon.
The driver was driving at 60mph on a residential 30mph road. He was found guilty of death by careless driving. The sentence was a 1 year ban and £500 fine.
I believe the lorry driver who killed Bruce Bursford had a similar sentence.
£500 was worth a lot more
£500 was worth a lot more then than now.
About 926 quid. And one year
About 926 quid. And one year was a lot longer too…(that’s also science.)
Fascinating stuff (seriously)
Fascinating stuff (seriously). I didn’t realise Forbes had articles like that.
CyclingMikey has now caught
CyclingMikey has now caught two drivers inhaling gas. This is in Central London, in broad daylight!
But mikey comments, “the Police are powerless to do anything, as the toxicity dissipates before it can be tested.”
Hmm… perhaps that explains
Hmm… perhaps that explains why people are doing it then? I thought possession was criminalised now – so presumably if they’d not finished all the cannisters it’d be simple? (I’m sure lawyers would be able to argue about possession of used “paraphernalia”…)
Before the law change, there
Before the law change, there would be hundreds of those small silver cannisters in the road after a weekend. I often wondered what the scrap value might be?
After the law change I now see these extra large spray cans instead lying everywhere. I wonder if there is a loophole somewhere?
admittedly the case was about
admittedly the case was about a crashed car, but there have been Premier league football players accused in court of inhaling laughing gas, prior to then being involved in the crash. But if the police were powerless to do anything about it, why would they have brought it up in the case ? as you wouldnt be able to prove anything about it based on simply someone saw them do it.
I’ve no idea, not knowing the
I’ve no idea, not being a lawyer, knowing the cases, what was reporting, what was given in evidence etc. Can only guess that sometimes evidence which can be challenged is introduced in the hope that either some will stick or more likely even if disputed / dismissed it will still colour perception of an individual.
I was in a restaurant with my
I was in a restaurant with my family a while back and there was a car parked outside. The driver and passenger were inhaling NOx and then drove off. I suppose I should’ve called the cops while they were still parked there. But it’s a common issue. Just see how many discarded NOx cylinders there are beside roads.
A pedant writes: If they were
A pedant writes: If they were in an ICE car with engine on they probably were inhaling NOx. But they only need the engine cylinders for that and they probably took them with them… common parlance has (unvoiced) s not x as in “nos” if I have it right?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx
(Agree though for a while I’ve noted these things lying about in quantity).
Good point, I’d forgotten my
Good point, I’d forgotten my chemistry and my old teacher Mr Street would’ve been very disappointed. N2O.
Words fail.
Words fail.
Matthew Briggs will be a happy man, another scum cyclist off his roads. All hail Briggs, Harper Duncan-Smith, Starmer, etc., etc. The champions of killers.
I was right!
I was right!
“A LORRY driver who knocked down and killed a British inventor and world record-breaking cyclist after being distracted by his mobile phone was fined £500 by a magistrate yesterday.
The widow and relatives of Bruce Bursford, a father of two and the breaker of 10 world cycling records, gasped in court as the level of the fine was announced.”
20+ years this was a very common sentence for killing someone due to careless driving.
And yet our wondeful
And yet our wondeful government (and the opposition) still think it’s a good idea to spend their time enacting legislation to ensure that dangerous cyclists face the full force of the law. Where’s the equity?
“This killer driver was
“This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias.”
It isn’t shocking, because it’s completely irrelevant.
How so? Killing someone
How so? Killing someone whilst driving a car seems to be accepted to a greater degree than practically any other way of killing.
What other ways of killing
What other ways of killing were you thinking of?
with a bicycle for example
with a bicycle for example
Another example of someone
The article says ‘his bmw’ but was it? He seemed to abandon it like there was no connection to him.
ps. Anyone else noticed that this comment field can’t be written into until after the save button is pressed and you get the ‘comment field is required’ message?
bikeman01 wrote:
Given the vile piece of shit he undoubtedly is I’d hazard a guess that the way he appears to be running away (in the opposite direction to Ms Perez-Gonzalez, note, didn’t even go to check if she was alive or dead) might indicate that he had some idea of claiming to the police that his car had been stolen.
bikeman01 wrote:
Are you on a Samsung tablet by any chance? I get something similar, although I never tried hitting save – I found that clicking the format dropdown makes it writable.
mdavidford wrote:
It behaves like that on an iPad too.
Off topic,
Off topic,
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/cow-surrey-police-ram-hit-video-james-cleverly-b2563252.html
Also off topic.
Also off topic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1002z9vne3o
‘Addressing the message to “all the dads out there” ahead of Father’s Day on Sunday, the star of Ramsay’s Kitchen Nightmares and Hell’s Kitchen stressed the importance of wearing a helmet.’
Not sure where he wears his
Not sure where he wears his helmet.
NotNigel wrote:
I did wonder about that too…
Great, another celebrity who
Great, another celebrity who knows nothing about road safety telling us about road safety. Stick with cooking Gordon.
What? So we shouldn’t wear
What? So we shouldn’t wear helmets and he wouldn’t have been far worse off without it?
Where do you see the problem?
Where do you see the problem? He’s expressing an opinion. You’re free to ignore it. He can’t actually force you to make you children wear helmets if you don’t want them wear to.
Yikes. That looks painful.
Yikes. That looks painful. Will be interesting to see what colour it is in a week or two.
john_smith wrote:
Lightly sautéed aubergine?
Maybe police shouldn’t
Maybe police shouldn’t participate in this kind of stich-up elsewhere then…
A 2 year driving ban? (I
A 2 year driving ban? (I assume he won’t get much driving, nitrous fuelled or otherwise while in jail…) should be much, much longer. I would support lifetime bans for anyone convicted of dangerous / careless driving. There shou;d be no place on public roads for drivers like this.
By that the judge is
By that the judge is depressingly admiting they’ll be out in under a year and a half for any sort of driving ban to kick in :-/
immediate lifetime ban. amen
immediate lifetime ban. amen to that.
Rather than pissing about
Rather than pissing about with sending refugees to Rwanda we should instead be buying space in North Korean reeducation camps for this piece of s*** to spend the next ten years.
Metro carried this story, and
Metro carried this story, and their version has the driver steering with his knees while inhaling the gas.