A disqualified lorry driver who sped through a red light and hit a cyclist, leaving her in a medically induced coma and requiring five months’ hospital treatment, will not face any additional jail time, after an appeal by Ireland’s Director of Public Prosecutors (DPP) was dismissed.
Belfast-born Kevin McMenamin, who witnesses said was driving at an “inappropriate” speed, made a sudden turn through a red light, colliding with a cyclist in her sixties, in Dublin on 22 July 2021.
The 43-year-old, who was disqualified from driving at the time with a “very long history” of road traffic offences, dragged the woman, who was trapped between the wheels of his lorry, along the road for two metres before passing motorists sounded their horns to alert him to stop.
The cyclist suffered several serious injuries in the collision, including a broken pelvis and severe leg trauma, was placed in a medically induced coma and was forced to undergo major surgery, spending almost five months in hospital.
In January 2024, after pleading guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to causing serious bodily harm by dangerous driving, McMenamin, a former Gaelic footballer who represented Donegal at senior level, was sentenced to 21 months in prison and disqualified from driving for five years.
Ireland’s Court of Appeal heard this week that the lorry driver had applied for enhanced remission, which permits prison sentences to be reduced by a third if the offender demonstrates good behaviour or is deemed unlikely to reoffend.
McMenamin was then moved to an open prison after less than two months, before being released in October 2024, just nine months into his stated 21-month term.
The motorist’s punishment, which fell far below the maximum 10-year sentence for the offence, led to an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutors (DPP), who argued that the limited prison term and driving ban was “simply too generous”.
According to the state, McMenamin, who has 33 previous convictions, including two for drink driving and eight for driving without insurance, is “someone who drives with disregard for the rights of other road users”, the Sunday World reports.

At Dublin’s Court of Appeal, a prosecuting garda told this week’s hearing that the female cyclist was travelling home through Ballsbridge in the south of the city when she noticed a large lorry “bouncing over speed bumps and going very fast”.
As she approached the lights at the junction of Herbert Park Road and Morehampton Road, where she was intending to ride straight through, witnesses said they saw the lorry driver accelerate quickly and drive at what they described as an “inappropriate speed”.
McMenamin, who onlookers said did not indicate, then made a sudden left turn onto Morehampton Road after the lights had turned red, striking the cyclist.
Jane Horgan-Jones, representing the DPP, told the appeal hearing that the sentencing judge erred by opting for a sentence “firmly in the lower range” of those available for this type of offence.
Horgan-Jones also pointed out that the five-year driving ban was just one year above the mandatory minimum disqualification of four years for causing serious bodily harm by dangerous driving. She argued that the discount given for mitigating factors, including McMenamin’s guilty plea and work history, were “simply too generous”.
However, Oisin Clarke, representing McMenamin, argued that the 21-month sentence did not, in fact, represent an error and noted that cases with worse aggravating features have resulted in similar or even lower sentences.
“One could not say that this is of such divergence that it would require this court to intervene,” he said.
Dismissing the appeal, Justice Tara Burns agreed that the DPP had failed to establish that McMenamin’s prison term was a “substantial departure from the appropriate sentence”.
The judge concluded that, due to the mitigating factors, the court was of the opinion that while the sentence “might be categorised as lenient”, it was not “unduly lenient”.
However, Justice Burns did admit that the lorry driver’s actions did not represent “a mere matter of inattention”, noting McMenamin’s “very long history” of road traffic offences and the fact he was driving the truck while disqualified at the time.
She added that McMenamin was driving a heavy goods vehicle in a residential area and turned left through a red light without warning, and without noticing the cyclist on his inside.
Nevertheless, the judge argued that while a term of imprisonment was “most certainly merited”, a number of mitigating features should also be considered, including McMenamin’s early guilty plea, his genuine expression of remorse, a long work history, and good character references.
She continued by arguing that while the 43-year-old’s driving was dangerous, it did not involve the aggravating characteristics of speed, intoxication, or the use of a mobile phone.
“We are also of the view that the sentence imposed adequately reflected the principles of general and specific deterrence,” the judge noted.
At his sentencing last year, the court had previously heard that McMenamin was an “extremely talented athlete” who represented Donegal for three years in the GAA’s National Football League, and had trials for Aston Villa and Celtic.




















20 thoughts on “Disqualified lorry driver who sped through red light and left cyclist in coma avoids further jail time – as judge rules initial nine-month term was not “unduly lenient””
(No subject)
was disqualified from driving
was disqualified from driving at the time with a “very long history” of road traffic offences,
was sentenced to 21 months in prison and disqualified from driving for five years.
Ireland’s Court of Appeal heard this week that the lorry driver had applied for enhanced remission, which permits prison sentences to be reduced by a third if the offender demonstrates good behaviour or is deemed unlikely to reoffend.
If this is justice, I’m a banana.
That’s completely wild if he
That’s completely wild if he received a reduced sentence because he was “deemed unlikely to reoffend” – he was driving while disqualified!
And since when does having a work history and sporting prowess become relevant? And if he didn’t have a job? Would that also be mitigating circumstances? Can’t wait for my 5k PB to be brought up in my defence if I ever have to defend myself.
You get off with all sorts if
You get off with all sorts if you’re prominent in the GAA (Gaelic Sports) in Ireland.
“Oisin Clarke, representing
“Oisin Clarke, representing McMenamin, argued that the 21-month sentence did not, in fact, represent an error and noted that cases with worse aggravating features have resulted in similar or even lower sentences.”
They’ve as muh as admitted that it’s a ridoculously lenkent sentence, but it’s normal to give lenient sentences for this kind of offence. Especially if the victim is a cyclist.
Another brilliant example of
Another brilliant example of the completely different world that motorist inhabit vs everyone else.
Pointing at other stupid sentences as proof your isn’t stupid. Pointing at someone who was undeniably guilty and saying “we shouldn’t reduce his sentence because he admitted to it”. Pointing at the fact he used to be famous as a point in his favour.
These are all arguments that should be laughed out of court and lawyers should be embarrassed to try and bring such shite up.
Meanwhile, in the UK…..
Meanwhile, in the UK….. sentencing of 2 men for cutting down a tree to be livestreamed due to public outcry. Any bets on how many cyclists lives worth of bird they get?
Apparently that pair of
Apparently that pair of muppets can operate chainsaws … thankfully we’ve a training, licencing and road policing system which will keep such obvious idiots from getting their hands on more dangerous things like motor vehicles.
They had training for that
They had training for that too though.
Reminds me of another muppet
Reminds me of another muppet with a chainsaw recently.
Reminds me of another muppet
Reminds me of another muppet with a chainsaw recently.
chrisonabike wrote:
And the 2nd biggest muppet in the world can operate a chainsaw: Elon Musk. I wonder if he’s got a driving licence?
I’ve been thinking the same
I’ve been thinking the same thing Every time I hear about the sentencing of them. they should have murdered someone with a motor vehicle would have got less time.
In this case, how the hell is it unlikely he’s going to reoffend when he’s reoffended 33 times?
genuine expression of remorse, wasn’t like was having to drive his sick granny to a hospital appointment. He was driving a Lorry, he was working, got behind that wheel knowing that he might kill someone. The firm who’s lorry he was driving should take a massive massive penalty. Amount of paperwork I have to fill in just so I can claim back my expenses for driving my own car, all out of hmrc rules.
The questions that popped I
The questions that popped into my head were…
Whose truck was he driving?
Did they know that he was disqualified?
What are there processes for keeping on top of such things?
Were they penalised, for allowing a disqualified driver to use their vehicle?
Aside from the unduly lenient
Aside from the unduly lenient sentence and, as we know, it will completely ignore any driving bans etc going forward, along with the terrible police work…
This is another new example of my advocacy of criminals in such extreme cases losing their libido and taste buds as being (potentially) the only deterrent.
Why couldn’t the court just
Why couldn’t the court just sentence him to riding a couple of hours per day for a year or two on the streets of Dublin wearing a jersey with a target on the back? That might have actually made him think about his driving in the future, which he is sure to be back at again.
What they’re really saying is
What they’re really saying is that it isn’t really a serious crime if you’re famous, so we can ignore his previous convictions, and it was only a cyclist. Motonormativity gone mad.
“a number of mitigating
“a number of mitigating features should also be considered, including . . . . a long work history,”
So ignore the “very long history of road traffic offences” but count the long work history which for at least part of he was driving illegally.
33 previous convictions,
33 previous convictions, including two for drink driving and eight for driving without insurance… yet deemed unlikely to reoffend
Clown court
Is this country a bloody joke
Is this country a bloody joke?