A motorist who was filmed deliberately blowing black smoke at two cyclists from the modified exhaust of his 4×4 has been described as “immature” and “a plonker”.
A lorry driver from Somerset posted the expletive-laden video on Facebook under the caption “Do you reckon she passes the emissions test?”
The footage shows two men in a muddied vehicle as they approach two cyclists on a narrow country road. The passenger tells the driver: “go on, do ‘em. Smoke the c**ts”. The driver then blows a huge cloud of black exhaust smoke at the cyclists as he overtakes them, while one of the men in the vehicle laughs, “get smoked boys”.
The process, which is known as ‘rolling coal’ and sees the exhaust emit thick plumes of black smoke, originated on the truck racing scene in the United States. Some motorists now illegally modify their vehicles to produce the same effect.
> ‘Rolling coal’ is assault, says District Attorney
In September 2021, a sixteen year old crashed into a group of six cyclists in Texas after allegedly ‘rolling coal’ at them in a Ford F-250 pick-up truck. The teenager was charged in November with six counts of felony aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
The Facebook account from which this week’s footage originated appears to belong to either the passenger or driver in the video. The same account posted an image of a 4×4 vehicle with a modified exhaust at the beginning of January. The man works for a haulage firm based in Bristol.
The video has been shared over 13,000 times since it was posted on Wednesday. While the action was criticised by local cycling groups on Facebook, one of the comments under the original video described the modified vehicle as “everyone’s new car after the new UK laws about cyclists”.
If anyone knows the victims or has been subjected to a similar incident, please get in touch with us at info@road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
38 thoughts on ““Get smoked boys”: Driver filmed ‘rolling coal’ at cyclists”
I’m sure they could be
I’m sure they could be prosecuted under several laws. But will they.
Clearly very immature,
Clearly very immature, yobbish behaviour, and worse in a residential area. I’m not sure if there is a law to prosecute however – for example there is a specific law in the road traffic act against splashing someone with a puddle, but I’m not sure the same thing applies to fumes. Which laws were you thinking of?
Putting someone in danger by
Putting someone in danger by deliberately impairing their view in traffic must be punishable, as must be endangering their health with noxious substances and polluting the environment. The alterations to the vehicle are surely illegal, too.
Ok, didn’t see who I was
Ok, didn’t see who I was replying to, but now it’s done…
And why would that make a
And why would that make a difference?
The modification of the
The modification of the vehicle by removing the catalytic converters is illegal in itself so they could be prosecuted under construction and use laws. As for offences against the cyclists, I’m sure the driver could be prosecuted under those sections of Common Assault law which deal with causing a reasonable person to fear an assault, also the same sections dealing with offences such as spitting at another person. A test case might be required to establish a precedent though.
Garage at Large wrote:
Just because you’ve asked. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/modifying-your-vehicles-emissions/modifying-your-vehicles-emissions-the-legal-safety-and-health-implications
So while an assault charge is unlikely the police could go down the ** road unworthy vehicle which carries s pretty hefty fine. Years ago a mate was pulled over as his car was belching black smoke the peeler had strong words with him and gave him a producer with the advise that if he didn’t show up with evidence of the repair a summons would be issued.
** that doesn’t look right unroadworthy vehicle was what I was saying but you all knew that anyway
Driving without due care for
Driving without due care for other road users. I would imagine it applies the same in this case.
If such a law called “driving
If such a law called “driving without due care for other road users” existed, the driver might very well be guilty of it.
But as it’s a figment of your imagination, I don’t think it would get very far in court!
It’s probably one for the top lawyers… Anyone think of one?
It comes under the ‘careless
It comes under the ‘careless driving’ charge. See image for points and duration on licence. Oh and here’s the link in case you think I’m telling porkies. https://www.gov.uk/penalty-points-endorsements/endorsement-codes-and-penalty-points
Mr Freeman no doubt will tell us they were attempting to clear their fuel pump/lines and the cyclists were unfortunately on the road at the time.
Give over, that’s for things
Give over, that’s for things like tailgating, not for letting out exhaust fumes.
You wouldn’t have a snowball’s chance of that sticking, I don’t need a top lawyer or road safety expert to know that as it’s basic common sense.
If I was in the police
If I was in the police following I would at the very least be pulling them over for excessive exhaust fumes and having the vehicle inspected. I would possibly consider a careless driving charge due to the excessive fumes and the presence of the cyclists as a smooth acceleration would not have produced the volume of fumes here. If not a charge then friendly words of advice.
I showed the clip to a friend who is ex-police and he said they would be looking at unroadworthy vehicle for definite and possibly carelesss or a severe rollicking.
I’ve been passed on numerous occasions in the country by these jeep type vehicles and lorries and never have I experienced something like that and hope never will.
Garage at Large wrote:
You used almost exactly that same phrase to argue that simply riding as a group of leisure cyclists was legally “without due consideration” of other road users. Now you’re using it to argue that rolling coal (which is illegal in its own right, let alone when intentionally directed at people) is totally fine.
Give over yourself, you sociopathic troll.
That would be the one.
That would be the one. Obviously some fucktards would think the decision rests on the proven impact, rather than the possible consequence or as in this case, the very likely intent.
Though I’m sure that there are lawyers out there who specialise in finding loopholes for dangerous privks that shouldn’t be on the road.
a.k.a. Inconsiderate Driving
a.k.a. Inconsiderate Driving
Garage at Large wrote:
Please can you provide a reference for the “specific law in the road traffic act against splashing someone with a puddle”?
Pardon me, I slightly mis
Pardon me, I slightly mis-wrote. It’s not in the act itself, but the charging guidelines for the CPS. I guess there would have to be a test case to see whether the video in question constituted an offence, but I’m skeptical as there doesn’t appear to have been any provable inconvenience caused to the cyclists, and there is a lack of evidence:
Driving without reasonable consideration
This offence is appropriate when the driving amounts to a clear act of incompetence, selfishness, impatience or aggressiveness in addition to some other inconvenience to road users. The following examples are typical of actions likely to be regarded as inconsiderate driving:
Yes, as I thought. So when
Yes, as I thought. So when Haitchhaitch slightly mis-named an actual offence under s.3 RTA 1988, you scoffed and called it “a figment of their imagination”, but when you invented “a specific law in the road traffic act” you simply “miswrote”? We have different ideas of politeness and courtesy.
Given that the charging guideline includes your puddle spashing example, I think giff77 was quite right to suggest coal rolling could also fall within the careless driving category shown in the image.
Garage at Large wrote:
What happened to being polite to other road users or does that only apply to cyclists
Gus T wrote:
I think it depends on whether the wankpanzer driver was making a meaningful journey from A to B, obviously in Garbageworld it is physically impossible for the cyclists to be making an MJ so the behaviour probably falls under the aegis of the “understandable annoyance” get-out-of-jail-free card.
I’m sure modifying a vehicle
I’m sure modifying a vehicle such that it fails emissions standards means the vehicle is not roadworthy and could mean points and a fine.
In addition, the act was clearly meant as assault.
Probably one of those ‘One Life Live It’ wankers who despoil there countryside, like those horrid scrambler bikes that should also be banned.
After that case in the USA,
After that case in the USA, rolling coal was described as an illegal assault; I wonder if the same applies here.
Immature and a plonker? I do so love the English understatement; cretinous, arrogant, infantile are slightly closer. I do hope someone recognises them and they get prosecuted, with the confiscation of the item they used to commit the crime; their vehicle.
I wonder if this is the same person who deliberately close passed a group of us near Chew Valley Lake a few years ago. Reported to the police but they’d used fake plates, so no further action.
eburtthebike wrote:
Have a look at his facebook photos, quite a lot of his cars and motorbikes over the years are on there for all to see.
This would appear to be the vehicle used. Quite distinctive…
edit: better photo https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10226424966320888
OMG; thanks I think. I
OMG; thanks I think. I wished I hadn’t looked at that, and the thought of sharing the road with someone like that armed with a gigantic truck is terrifying. I’m sure he’s going to be following the new HC rules.
The absolutely stereotypical truck driver, petrolhead and infant, but no sign of the car in my incident, but he has to be high on the list of suspects.
This might cheer you up…
This might cheer you up…
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10225709853123505
“Get smoked”
“Get smoked”
HoarseMann wrote:
Thanks. So sad to see his pride and joy go up in flames; maybe it was the cyclist he smoked. God knows how, but I managed to forgo leaving a comment on his page.
Can’t wait to see this scrotum up in court and lose his licence.
eburtthebike wrote:
Can’t be these cyclists, as the fire was back in August and this is a replacement land rover.
Now I’m not a religious man, but if ever there was a ‘sign’ to change your driving ways, it’s having your collection of chavmobiles mysteriously go up in flames!
HoarseMann wrote:
Oh, that’s so sad.
Does anyone have the means to
Does anyone have the means to copy or save the video before it’s deleted?
yep got it
yep got it
This is the location of the
This is the location of the incident, for anyone in the area to be aware when riding around those lanes.
https://goo.gl/maps/UDsqvk58NSWzHxda9
Banwell is pretty close to
Banwell is pretty close to Chew Valley and Velvet Bottom – where there were 2 x cyclists pushed off for fun by a land rover discovery driver. One of them had a shattered pelvis from memory.
It could well be the same
It could well be the same individual.
Now that we know where it happened and therefore which police force to contact, what’s stopping someone putting in a police report? It doens’t have to be the victim (in fact, they’re usually called a witness anyway). Witnessing a crime being committed online, is still witnessing a crime.
The only thing missing is the time of the incident. But there’s CCTV on the house they went past, so the police could possibly get the whole incident, car registration and even who’s behind the wheel from that.
Leaving aside the horrible
Leaving aside the horrible and infantile targeting of cyclists, what kind of moron modifies their vehicle to produce criminal levels of pollution when we’re staring down the barrel of the climate crisis?
A moron who never learns.
A moron who never learns. Given that his last land rover got destroyed in a barn fire, you would think he wouldn’t be thrashing its replacement just before it’s parked up.
Not sure what’s worse, being
Not sure what’s worse, being such a waste of skin that you’d do that, or being such a monumental berk that you’re proud enough to share it.
Would that be the same open
Seems like the kind of attitude you don’t want behind the wheel of a HGV.
He’s boasting about having a professional licence on his page.