Motorists have reacted to footage of the collision which left broadcaster Dan Walker “glad to be alive” by accusing the Channel 5 presenter of “putting himself in danger” by “ignoring” a nearby cycle lane – described by local cyclists as “filled with broken glass”.
On Monday, Walker, who took up cycling last year, revealed on Twitter that he had a “bit of an accident this morning” and was “glad to be alive after getting hit by a car” while riding his bike to Sheffield Station as part of his morning commute.
The former BBC Breakfast host also shared pictures of his facial injuries, which he described as a “mess”, though he added that he does not think he suffered any broken bones in the collision.
> Dan Walker "glad to be alive" after being hit by a driver while cycling
Footage of the crash, captured by a motorist’s rear-facing camera, has since been shared by the Sun, and shows Walker cycling on a busy roundabout in Sheffield before a motorist veers across into his lane and hits him from behind, sending him clattering to the ground.
The 45-year-old was left unconscious for 25 minutes before police and paramedics arrived, and told the Sun that he has “zero recollection” of the collision.
“I thought I was a goner to be honest,” he said. “My face is a proper mess. I might need some surgery.”
> Video emerges of Dan Walker being hit by driver, but MailOnline claims “rear wheel caught car’s front wing”
While Walker has attracted criticism since the collision from some road safety advocates after claiming on Twitter that “the helmet I was wearing saved my life” and imploring other cyclists to “get one on your head”, the publication of the crash footage has now resulted in the presenter being targeted by social media users unhappy that he seemingly “ignored” a nearby cycle lane.
Some motorists on Twitter have pointed out that Walker was riding on Moore Street roundabout, near Sheffield city centre, at the time of the collision, which is situated next to a cycle lane located on an underpass.
> Why don't cyclists use cycle lanes?
“This is insane, who attempts to cycle round a four-lane highway when there’s a completely separate cycle way especially built right beside it? Honestly, some cyclists really do not help themselves,” wrote one Twitter user.
Another claimed that they have “zero sympathy” for the presenter after watching the footage, and argued that the collision was evidence that “cyclists feel they can cycle anywhere they like with scant regard to theirs or anyone else’s safety for that matter”.
“Ah, so it turns out instead of Dan Walker using the designated cycling path away from a busy roundabout, he put himself in danger and by cycling foolishly hit the car rather than the car ‘hitting’ him as he claims,” the South Coast Captured Twitter account wrote, echoing MailOnline’s rather dubious headline which claimed that Walker’s rear wheel “caught [the] car’s front wing”.
However, local cyclists have defended the Channel 5 presenter’s choice to avoid using the subway, photos of which were published by the Mail, which has been described on Twitter as a “dank tunnel”.
Moore Street’s shared use underpass
According to Arbarthista, the ‘cycle lane’ in question is actually a shared use underpass, designed for pedestrians to cross under the roundabout, with “a few bits of paint to make it shared use”.
Another cyclist who has used both the roundabout and the shared use infrastructure described the underpass as “pretty good for surfacing, sight lines out are good but not entering so you can encounter nefarious characters”.
“I know this road well,” added Jack. “That underpass they reference is generally filled with broken glass, hence why a lot of riders avoid it.”
Sheffield-based CyclingInASkirt also claimed that the shared use lane “has been filled with broken glass for days”.
“It very often is,” she continued. “Maybe Dan Walker knew this, so went via the roundabout instead.
“Cyclists only use lanes fit for purpose – most of them are not. We aren’t doing it just to piss off motorists.”
Add new comment
67 comments
I think he/she uses Brexit world synonymous to post truth world. Which it is.
Not sure this is a "Brexit benefit". Pretty sure people were talking nonsense (never mind completely ignorant of what's needed for cycling AND motoring-mad) from before the EEC, never mind the current union!
I also remember before Brexit when drivers were completely reasonable when it came to cyclists.
The pandemic was the tipping point for me. From 2020 things sudddenly got so hostile that i had to buy a camera, and have 260 recorded incidents since then, with most being passed to police.
Even without Brexit those blaming Dan would have been doing so as they have done so for years. The DM and others have been spinning their hate toward cyclists for years.
Surely all the drivers telling him to use the dedicated(ish) cycle facility, should have been using the nearby motorway.
Hear, hear!!! They they would't have to complain about having to share the road with non-drivers.
Pages