Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

“Go and protest properly!”: Cyclist pushes Just Stop Oil protestors off the road to make way for traffic

The enraged cyclist was seen dispersing people by aggressively pushing and shoving them in London, but Just Stop Oil have said that they “need everyone, including cyclists” to join them

As the climate change and environment activist group Just Stop Oil started their tenth week of protests in the country’s capital, things came to a head when a cyclist decided to take matters into his own hands and started pushing and pulling the protestors, telling them to “f****** move” and “go and protest properly”.

Dressed in blue shirt and blue shorts with a bike in hand, the cyclist appeared to aggressively shove the activists blocking the Holloway Road in Islington, London this morning to draw attention to the group’s demand for the government to stop licencing all new oil, coal, and gas projects.

“All of you, get out of the f****** way! Move!” screamed the cyclist, as he was joined by another man wearing a blue shirt. The two of them managed to clear off a section of the road to let drivers by.

As the cyclist was leaving the site, he said: “Go and protest properly, you s*** a*** c****!”

*Warning: clip contains strong language*

However, Just Stop Oil asked: “What are we supposed to do in a crisis caused by our government? Sit tight and wait until they decide to call an election?”

Meanwhile, some people suggested if the cyclist was guilty of assault, and questioned if the police would take action against the cyclist.

After today's incident, Just Stop Oil has replied to road.cc regarding the cyclists’ involvement and him asking the activists to “protest properly”.

A spokesperson said: “We understand that it is frustrating when individuals like this cyclist get caught up in disruption, but history shows that only disruptive protest works. We’re not prepared to stand on the pavement and be ignored, the stakes are too high.

“We face increasingly frequent extreme weather events such as heatwaves, wildfires and floods which threaten transport, homes, health and livelihoods. Our crops will not survive and we will face mass starvation and the collapse of ordered civil society unless we stop new oil and gas.  

“We need everyone, including cyclists, to join us on the streets.”

> Just Stop Oil begin slow cycling protests

The Metropolitan Police confirmed enforcement actions had been taken after today's slow march, which saw four groups march in different locations on the capital. Officers, issuing the Section 12 used against unlawful assemblies, including blocking roads, cleared the Islington road later and informed that traffic was back to moving now.

The incident has once again heightened the violent rhetoric against activists, with another incident showing a motorcyclist driving through two protestors holding a banner. Figures like Howard Cox have declared on live television that he is “tempted to run the protestors over”.

After today’s video went viral, reactions were mixed. Some people pointed out that the drivers for whom the cyclist was clearing the way would “happily run him off the road”, while others claimed that the man had done more than anyone “to amend cyclist-driver relations”.

It’s not the first time that a cyclist has found himself in opposition to the environment activist group.

Previously in May, a cyclist on the pavement of the same road as the incident today approached the Just Stop Oil protestors and accused them of “harming the cause” and “f***ing it up for all of us”.

The rider – who pointed out to the protesters that he was “a liberal and a cyclist” – told them: “Everyone is just trying to go about their business, go about their day, and you are f***ing it all up for all of them.

“You might feel better about yourselves, but all you are doing is harming the cause because everyone hates you.”

He added: “I’m a liberal, and a cyclist, and I live in north London – and I hate you.”

> “You are f***ing it up for all of us”: Cyclist makes the headlines after berating Just Stop Oil activists for “hurting the green cause”

The incident, as expected, divided cyclists’ opinions on social media, with people questioning how can you be a cyclist and oppose Just Stop Oil, while others claimed that despite being a cyclist they didn’t agree with the methods used by the group.

Three weeks ago, Just Stop Oil, which usually takes to the roads on foot and organises slow marches to cause disruption and draw attention to their cause, staged its first ‘slow cycle’  demonstration, as activists rode their bikes slowly in London’s West End.

A spokesperson from Just Stop Oil told road.cc that the change was part of the group’s plans to “evolve” its tactics in the face of what it claims is the government’s attempt to “restrict our legitimate rights to protest”.

“This criminal government is quietly signing off on over 100 new oil and gas projects that will hasten climate collapse and destroy the conditions that make human life possible. It is an act of war against the young and millions of people in the global south,” the spokesperson said.

“At the same time, they are enacting laws to ensure that no-one can stop them. They are restricting our legitimate rights to protest and to march in the road as people have done throughout history to express dissent. So, our tactics will continue to evolve.

“We are happy to show solidarity with cyclists everywhere and ask them to join us in civil resistance. Whether marching or cycling we will continue to do whatever is non-violently possible to end new oil and gas.”

What do you think? Should cyclists be in support of Just Stop Oil’s environment activism or is their disruption too much of an inconvenience in the face of climate change?

Adwitiya joined road.cc in 2023 as a news writer after graduating with a masters in journalism from Cardiff University. His dissertation focused on active travel, which soon threw him into the deep end of covering everything related to the two-wheeled tool, and now cycling is as big a part of his life as guitars and football. He has previously covered local and national politics for Voice Wales, and also likes to writes about science, tech and the environment, if he can find the time. Living right next to the Taff trail in the Welsh capital, you can find him trying to tackle the brutal climbs in the valleys.

Add new comment

125 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Rich_cb | 1 year ago
3 likes
Rich_cb wrote:

They "hope" to produce 0.25% of the world's steel using hydrogen within 7 years. I really don't think it's an unreasonable position to say that they will struggle to make hydrogen made steel a mainstream technology within 10 years of that. My whole point has always been that a UK mine would produce fewer emissions than the mines in Russia/Australia it would displace. Your own links confirm this. The fact that the UK mine is also much closer to Europe wil obviously reduce transport emissions. My other claim was that there is no plan to decarbonise UK steel by 2035. Your last quote confirms that too. What evidence do you want besides what you've already provided? Carbon emissions don't care about borders. Banning UK mines and then importing coal from far more polluting foreign mines is just rank stupidity. We need to focus on reducing our use of fossil fuels but while we still require fossil fuels (like in steel making) we should be using the least impactful version of that fuel. Do you honestly think mining coal in Australia/Russia and shipping it to Europe would produce fewer emissions than mining it here?

You're banging the "need to import coal" drum again which I've disproved.

You're failing to understand that no matter what tiny benefits you can scrape from the bottom of the barrel , it is clearly not in the world's interest to extract more coal.

As I say, you're just arguing in bad faith, I won't bother continuing this.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
0 likes

You absolutely have not disproved it.

You've found somebody 'hoping' to make miniscule quantities of steel using hydrogen by 2030.

Where's the rest of the virgin steel going to come from?

Coal powered blast furnaces that's where.

Where's the coal coming from for those blast furnaces?

Australia and Russia mainly.

Myopic policies that actually create more global carbon emissions are exactly what the world doesn't need. Pointlessly focusing on emissions inside our borders is counterproductive, we have to take a holistic global view.

It might seem counterintuitive but opening a new coal mine in the UK is the greenest option available to us. We should take it.

You neglected to answer my question so I'll try again. Do you honestly think that mining coal in Australia and then shipping it halfway around the world will produce fewer emissions than mining it in the UK?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Rich_cb | 1 year ago
2 likes
Rich_cb wrote:

You absolutely have not disproved it. You've found somebody 'hoping' to make miniscule quantities of steel using hydrogen by 2030. Where's the rest of the virgin steel going to come from? Coal powered blast furnaces that's where. Where's the coal coming from for those blast furnaces? Australia and Russia mainly. Myopic policies that actually create more global carbon emissions are exactly what the world doesn't need. Pointlessly focusing on emissions inside our borders is counterproductive, we have to take a holistic global view. It might seem counterintuitive but opening a new coal mine in the UK is the greenest option available to us. We should take it. You neglected to answer my question so I'll try again. Do you honestly think that mining coal in Australia and then shipping it halfway around the world will produce fewer emissions than mining it in the UK?

You're just going round in circles and you're getting extremely tiresome.

From https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/11/new-cumbria-coalmine-backlash-grows-as-steel-industry-plays-down-demand

Quote:

Senior steel industry figures have rejected claims that their demand for coal has driven the government’s divisive decision to sanction the first new UK coalmine for 30 years.

I'm not answering your pathetic question as you're being ridiculous and claiming that there is a need for coal, but not providing any evidence of that whatsoever.

Good day.

Avatar
Rich_cb replied to hawkinspeter | 1 year ago
2 likes

There's no European demand for coking coal?

Strange that they import 40 million tonnes of it every year.

A UK mine would displace imports from Russia/Australia. Australia and Russia are continuing to expand their coal mines so reduced demand would lead to fewer new mines in those countries.

You've refused to answer the question because you can't without demolishing your entire argument.

For completion's sake the answer is that every tonne of imported coking coal has a carbon footprint 1.5-3x higher than coking coal mined in Europe.

Using European mined coal is, in carbon terms, the equivalent of converting at least a third of blast furnaces to hydrogen.

Take off your blinkers. If you want to reduce carbon emissions then we need to get mining.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/opinion/towards-a-eu...

Avatar
Fignon's ghost replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
3 likes

Spot on. He has no legal right to proceed and assault those individuals.

Thug.

Pages

Latest Comments