“Do you pay road tax?” GB News host admits he jumps red lights while cycling; Reckless driver avoids sentencing after taking injured cyclist to hospital; Belfast bike-rentals soar; Rwanda Worlds round-up + more on the live blog
SUMMARY
Unsafe driver spared ban due to "family hardship"
A Chadwell Heath driver has avoided a driving ban after admitting to overtaking a cyclist without due care and attention.
Abdul Noim was driving a BMW X5 SUV on the single-carriageway A487 in Pembrokeshire when he overtook the cyclist at an unsafe speed, distance and without leaving his own lane, as reported by the Ilford Recorder.
But after the court heard Mr Noim needed to take his family to and from school as well as medical appointments, he was handed six points on his license rather than receiving an eight week driving ban. He was also ordered to pay £543 in fines and surcharges.
Belfast bike hire quintuples in price as e-bike rollout begins
Those of you living in Greater Manchester, Birmingham or Leeds might have become familiar with the Beryl hire bikes over the last couple of years. Well now they’ve taken over the bike hire scheme in Belfast, but not without a hitch.
Rolled out at the weekend, the cost of an annual subscription has skyrocketed from £25 to £120. A standard 20 minute Pay As You Go (PAYG) ride has also nearly doubled in price.
Beryl’s Chief Executive told the BBC the pricing was “pretty competitive” but added that “If we’ve got it wrong, we’ll have to do something about it.”
Part of the increase in time-period ‘bundle purchases’ is due to the rollout of electric bikes across the city. These rolling subscriptions apply the same price point to both standard and electric hire bikes, unlike the PAYG scheme which charges separate rates.
A 20 minute bike ride on a standard ‘pedal’ bike will cost £1.90 whereas an electric bike ride of the same length will cost £3.80, a similar price to bus tickets. That includes an ‘unlocking fee’ to start your ride, coupled with a rolling rate. E-bike users will have to pay an additional £1 unlocking fee as part of each e-bike ride taken in a monthly, quarterly or annual pass. Using the bikes also requires downloading and creating an account on the Beryl app.
Rwanda Worlds round-up: young Dutch courage triumphs
The World Championships in Rwanda are continuing and after yesterday’s under-23 TTs, today’s the turn of the next generation to show their worth.
On the women’s side, the steep cobbled climb of the Cote de Kimihurura two kilometres from the finish was perfect for former junior Tour of Flanders runner-up Megan Arens, the 18-year old able to extend her two second lead at the intermediate time check to 35 seconds at the finish line. Both British entrants, Erin Boothman and Abi Miller, finished in the top-10.
The men will get underway shortly, with the USA’s Ashlin Barry among the favourites. The 17-year old son of former US Postal, Team Columbia, and Sky domestique Michael Barry is already signed to Visma – Lease a Bike’s development team for next year and finished second in Junior Paris-Roubaix and E3 earlier in the year. Britain’s Dylan Sage and Max Hinds will be hoping to give Barry a run for his money, both have been rumoured to join Ineos’ new development team that is due to be up and running next year.
'Lached' in: Endurance cyclist Morton heads to Yorkshire.
Road cyclist turned ultra endurance extraordinaire Lachlan Morton is coming to Yorkshire this weekend to race cyclocross!
The Australian will be returning to tackle the Three Peaks Cyclocross race that is considered the hardest ‘cross course in the UK. Morton previously entered the race in 2019, finishing 4th. The event, more than 60 years old, is 61km long and will see riders summitting the mountains of Ingleborough, Whernside and Pen Y-Ghent.
Morton, still contracted with his old road team of EF Education-EasyPost, has in recent years completed a series of alternative sporting challenges, including riding the entire Tour de France route (plus transfers) faster than the peloton, setting a new record for circumnavigating Australia, and winning the Unbound Gravel race. The Three Peaks is surely a natural sporting progression…
Driver's case struck off after taking injured cyclist to hospital
Some interesting news from Ireland now where a woman who reported herself for reckless driving after a cyclist ran into her car door has had her case struck off.
The Irish Independent describes Cherry Mae Vente as a “good Samaritan” after she took the cyclist to hospital and then took him home after he sustained two cracked ribs and a fractured collarbone.
The cyclist never reported the incident but police in County Kerry were obliged to press charges following Ms Vente’s admission of careless driving. The case was struck off the record however after her solicitor presented the case in court.
Hand-cycling to Paris
Something nice to bring you now and it’s an epic fundraising campaign that has already raised more than £200,000.
In 2012, Danny Turnbull handcycled to Paris. A lawyer by profession, he was also paraplegic. His effort defied event organisers who thought such a feat wouldn’t be possible. The event is now known as the ‘No Limits’ London to Paris ride in recognition of Danny’s achievements before he died of cancer in 2017.
In his memory, a team of 60 will set off on Friday to recreate his journey and raise money for the spinal injury charity Back Up, of which Danny was a patron. The three-day mission will be headed by Danny’s widow Susie, and will be undertaken by Danny’s friends, family, solicitors from his law firm and five hand-cyclists following in his wheeltreads.
“Despite how difficult it was, completing the ride demonstrated exactly what Danny was trying to prove; that if you believe you can do it, you can find a way.” Susie says.
“That’s what this ride is now, it’s a platform for people to challenge and overcome their own limits and to demonstrate that life can go on after a spinal injury.”
The participants have set a goal of £500,000 with the money going towards expanding Back Up’s outreach services to help those who can’t rely on the NHS. It’s a worthy goal and one which we wish everyone involved the very best of luck with.
"Don't brake!": Van der Poel's advice to Philipsen as the Belgian dabbles off-road
As long as Paris-Roubaix is on the calendar it does no harm to brush up on bike handling, and in his teammate and three-time winner of the race, Jasper Philipsen has the best source of wisdom he could ask for. Just maybe don’t rely on him so much for MTB…
Incredibly horrifying crash by cycling legend Mathieu van der Poel in the #Olympics mountain bike race. Oh, and he got back up and is still riding. pic.twitter.com/yLPxdROweI
— Remko Rinkema (@RemkoRinkema) July 26, 2021
"Do you pay road tax?": GB News host admits he jumps red lights while cycling during debate on cyclist “crackdown”
When transport journalist Carlton Reid tweeted (Bluesky-d?) that GB News were hosting a debate on their breakfast show about cyclists this morning, we braced for the usual onslaught.
GB News will be ranting about cyclists tomorrow morning. I declined the producer’s invitation.
— Carlton Reid (@carltonreid.com) 22 September 2025 at 18:54
It followed a heated sparring yesterday between GB News presenters Tom Harwood and Nana Akua following reports that punishments for skipping red lights in London were going to be harshened.
In truth, that’s not quite the story. It’s only City of London Police that are considering tougher measures, and they only cover a square mile in the centre of the city (the rest of London is governed by the Metropolitan Police). The proposed change is to increase the maximum fine above £50.
Still, with Harwood revealing himself to be a cyclist, he suggested he could skip red lights when pedestrians weren’t around, kickstarting the following exchange:
Akua: The safest way is for everyone to follow the same rules. Because let’s say something happens that you haven’t spotted, you cause an accident and someone gets hurt. What insurance do you have? Do you pay road tax?
Harwood: I do for my car, but not for my bike.
Akua: Exactly. And that’s the problem.
In what went on to be a fairly serene discussion on the merits of Amsterdam-style bike lanes, the road tax quip stood out.
Road tax, as a tax that explicitly and exclusively funds the roads, has not existed since 1937. The Vehicle Excise Duty that has more-or-less existed since 1920 only applies to motor vehicles. Cyclists do not pay it because they are not able to pay it. Whilst there was a brief period under the previous government when a ‘National Roads Fund’ was created from the Vehicle Excise Duty fund, that was dissolved in spring last year and roads continue to be funded by general taxation that all of us pay.
The excise duty is also variable with zero and lower emission vehicles paying less than high-polluting and older motors. With no carbon footprint and significantly reduced impact on road deterioration, cyclists would not need to pay the excise duty.
Still, this morning the debate went on and presenters Eamonn Holmes and Penny Smith moderated a discussion between motoring journalist Amanda Stretton and Stop Killing Cyclists co-founder Donnachadh McCarthy. Thankfully the debate was civil and resulted in agreement between the two over the respective responsibilities of drivers and cyclists on the road. It was a slightly heartening exchange, and diminished the ‘rage-baiting’ spectacle that Carlton Reid feared the whole thing might become.
My reply: “I don’t do rage bait.” My reasoning: “Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.” Quote by Shannon L. Alder
— Carlton Reid (@carltonreid.com) 22 September 2025 at 19:04
23 September 2025, 09:04
The bike industry has not been in a great place lately. On Saturday we reported on a York bike shop that's closing after 45 years. Then yesterday evening, Sigma Sports recorded further losses
Cycling retailer Sigma Sports halves losses to £925,000 and insists 2024 was "positive" despite cost-of-living crisis, inflation and inventory woes battering bike industry
Sigma Sports confident it is "leading premium retailer" in the bike industry but predicts "backdrop of UK's economy to remain challenging" this year
23 September 2025, 09:04
23 September 2025, 09:04
23 September 2025, 09:04
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
25 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
I guess you’ve never been for a ride in the countryside, and wanted to stop somewhere there isn’t a perfectly-positioned tree, fence or wall? Or have always had the good fortune to have a bike rack or wall positioned perfectly where you need it, and been happy to balance your bike and trust no-one will nudge it. I accept that’s a valid use case.
If you can afford a £3000 ebike you can almost certainly afford this. Especially as it’s the last one you’ll ever need to buy. Of course people will value the utility in their own way, there’s no definitive right / wrong, there’s just choice.
@jackcycles "The idea that you need a dedicated cycleway in order to ride a bike is ludicrous and false" You might not need one because you're a brave cyclist. There are many people in this country who aren't brave, who don't like mixing with traffic, and who won't cycle if they have to. So they need a dedicated cycleway, despite your protestations. "Just be more assertive" will never, ever work as a tool to enable more cycling.
@neilmck Other studies have shown different results, however, e.g. a 2025 study in Barcelona showed injury rates on uni-directional cycle paths were slightly higher than on bi-directional ones - I'll post the link below as otherwise might end up in the black hole of link approval quarantine. The study you cite is from 1990 when in many areas cycle provision was very much in its infancy and drivers were much less accustomed to watching for cyclists in separate infrastructure than they are now. As ever, in my experience at least, the issue is not the cycle lane per se but junction design, with proper mitigating measures e.g. raised tables at junctions, different surface colours, warning signage, set back give ways etc there's no reason bidirectional lanes should be more dangerous.
Bi-directional cycle paths are very dangerous and councils should use extreme caution when deciding to install them. The problem is the complexity they provide motorists who have to cross them. There was a study made in Berlin that shows you are 12 times more likely to be killed at a crossing on a bi-directional cycle path than if you cycled on the road. https://www.bikexprt.com/bikepol/facil/sidepath/adfc173.htm
That - if it is like the photo - seems to be an inadequate and very poor entrance design. Where are the physical features to enforce behaviour? There will be a queue of cars sitting on the mobility track. The LHA could have CPOd a small slice of land to make it adequate and given a one or two car standing area by the carriageway with a bent-in mobility track. I'd say the designers have looked the other way.
I’m not sure this is a problem really. How often does the car boot sale take place?once a week at most, and not every week either? And not all day. I’m sure all users can manage and it would mean everyone taking car at the entrance / exit.
Many years since lived in Cheltenham but if the coach park is where I think it is there is another car park on the opposite side of Evesham rd also part of the race course and has an entrance off the main road and off a side road unlike the coach park it has no hard standing though ...
Ernest Hemingway was once sent off by his wife to buy a suit bag from a New York department store for an upcoming trip to Europe: the sales assistant showed him a top quality bag which, he assured him, could easily accommodate half a dozen suits. Hemingway explained, "Can afford bag. Can afford six suits. Can't afford both." I think this extraordinarily priced item would create the same problem, can afford through axle, or can afford a stand to attach to it, but...
Funny how opinions can differ. As a lifelong cyclist in The Netherlands (basically anything, from errands to daily commutes to cargo to mtb/gravel to bike messaging and bike packing) for over 4 decades, I've never missed a kickstand. There's just always something to lean my bike against, and apparently I am just very skilled at doing so, as my bike never tips over (pro tip: keep it almost vertical, and lean it with the rear *tire* against the pole/wall/tree etc.). Being a bike mechanic in my country means I deal with bikes with kickstands all the time, and I hate them. There's just about always something going on with them. They rattle, they have play because the bolts come loose, they creak, the black paint flakes off, the end cap gets lost, they are unstable. And of course, they are heavy, and ugly. And often quite expensive to boot.
25 thoughts on ““Do you pay road tax?” GB News host admits he jumps red lights while cycling; Reckless driver avoids sentencing after taking injured cyclist to hospital; Belfast bike-rentals soar; Rwanda Worlds round-up + more on the live blog”
to save you the googling, a
to save you the googling, a new BMW x5 bought without financing will cost £68k to £115k. Second hand and financing are of course options, but if you can afford that car, you can afford taxis.
Though it begs the questions:
Though it begs the questions:
– how much more is the insurance for a driver with points, assuming an insurer will provide cover…
– will such an increase be too much for the driver
Asking the real questions.
Asking the real questions. Perhaps we should all contribute to a national fund to help these poor
bellendsvictimised motorists to afford their insurance.will such an increase be too
will such an increase be too much for the driver
– will such a driver care, and skip this step?
the little onion wrote:
They do lose their value quickly so can be picked up for the cost of a cheap banger these days.
Ilford Recorder. “Abdul Noim,
Ilford Recorder. “Abdul Noim, 51, of Saville Road in Chadwell Heath, admitted driving without due care and attention in a BMW X5. “
At least the law has been sensibly adjusted to make special offenses for BMW X5 drivers. Teslas and Discos next, I hope.
Cheapest x5 on eBay is ~£1
Cheapest x5 on eBay is ~£1,300. They’ve been around 20+years now…
He lives in Chadwell Heath so
He lives in Chadwell Heath so within striking distance of 5 Railway Stations, 4 Underground Stations and numerous major bus routes….. oh the hardship!
Harwood: I do for my car, but
Harwood: I do for my car, but not for my bike.
Akua: Exactly. And that’s the problem.
My current ved is £0
I am part of the problem.
I guess the idea that different types of road user pay different amounts is too nuanced for gbeebies.
I’m sure I’m preaching to the
I’m sure I’m preaching to the choir here, but the other important point is that VED is not “road tax” – the funds received go to the Treasury as general taxation and are not ringfenced for any specific purpose. This has been the case since the Road Fund was abolished in 1936, so it’s not exactly a recent change.
Similarly pedestrians don’t
Similarly pedestrians don’t pay pedestrian tax and so shouldn’t be allowed to use the footway.
It is a poor argument because some things are included in general taxation because it is simpler, fairer, and more cost effective that way. Collecting predicated taxes or distributing means tested benefits costs money. This used to be the argument for not means-testing the winter fuel payment. Times change though. Maybe we will get the pedestrian tax after all.
The poll tax ?
The poll tax ?
Does it really matter that
Does it really matter that proponents of the ‘cyclists dont pay road tax’ get the name wrong? Motorists are taxed for their vehicles and resent that cyclists are not. They are wrong but getting pedantic over the name wont help
Why not just respond by asking what amount they think cyclists should pay, would it also apply to children, would it apply to zero emission vehicles, tractors, horses, what would it cost to collect and would its collection get them to shut the fk up?
Equally, “motorists” (ie the
Equally, “motorists” (ie the frothing non cyclist type) also enjoy the same freedom/rights that everyone else does to operate a bicycle, horse or pair of shoes on a public highway without being subjected to VED. Not my fault they choose not to do so.
I agree.
I agree.
Clem Fandango wrote:
… and while those who drive pay specific taxes those don’t cover the full costs of the activity (see “externalities of motoring”…
Whoever uses the term “road
Whoever uses the term “road tax” needs to be corrected each time.
This time on GB News was a lost opportunity.
The correct response should have been:
“You don’t pay road tax. No one does. It does not exist.”
With a brief explanation of what VED is, which would have hopefully ended the conversation.
If the idiot says they did, then they can be asked to show a reciept stating “Road Tax” which they won’t be able to do.
Not forgetting this incident:
https://youtu.be/S7enDsD5bpc
I would love to see people
I would love to see people sue the police or whoever is responsible for leaving these people on our roads when they go and hurt of kill someone because they were spared a ban due to the “hardship” it would cause them.
At what point does this excuse not fly? Going to prison will cause families hardship. Perhaps we shouldn’t do that any more. If you care about your family then you shouldn’t be driving in a way that will get yourself banned and if you aren’t a generally uncaring cunt then perhaps you shouldn’t be directly putting peoples lives at risk for 0 reason.
Perhaps the fact that you got caught when the chances of getting caught are so slim suggests that this is a pattern of behaviour and you are doing it so frequently that somehow you beat the odds and did get caught.
100%
100%
The interesting/annoying thing is there are many actions that would fail a learner driver on their practical test and thus mean they are not allowed to drive (without an instructor or other adult).
But as soon as a person passes, those same dangerous driving faults are deemed to not be worthy of disqualification.
Oh its completely ridiculous.
Oh its completely ridiculous. “Sorry madam, you have failed your test for a single major error. Oh no, you could do that a dozen times every journey and you wouldn’t likely be caught or have your license revoked even if you were once you have passed. We just need to make sure that you can drive safely one time for an hour or so.”
Breaking: Cyclist killed in
Breaking: Cyclist killed in Manchester
Cyclist dies in north Manchester crash
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/cyclist-dies-north-manchester-crash-32533884?utm_source=app
“…after the court heard Mr
“…after the court heard Mr Noim needed to take his family to and from school as well as medical appointments, …” Motorists are de jure allowed to drive recklessly and endanger other road users provided they drive their family to medical appointments. This is an open invitation to more irresponsible behaviours behind the wheel.
It’s utterly ridiculous. If
It’s utterly ridiculous. If he can afford to run a wankpanzer, he can afford a few bus tickets.
Eton Rifle wrote:
Without defending the twat in any way, the “exceptional hardship” defence is almost never about being unable to afford alternative transport (I think I’ve only seen it raised for people living way out in the country with no public transport saying how much constant cabs will cost them) but about logistics, I won’t be able to get little Tommy to school five miles away on the bus and get back in time to take granny to her regular physiotherapy appointment and after that put in my usual twelve hours volunteering at the soup kitchen. Exemption is usually asked for (and given far too often) on practical, rather than economic, grounds.
It’s the white van man’s
It’s the white van man’s burden. Care-cars.
Turns out everyone only ever drives for others – as a company manager for their employees, as a carer for elderly and/or disabled relatives or friends. For their children, their children’s ponies, their sick cats, dogs, ferrets…
Why should these innocents suffer? Surely *having to drive* is effectively “community service” by itself, so not only should they not lose their licence but doing all that involuntary driving should be the whole of the punishment *. They can pay their debt to society *and* do some rehabilitation for their bad driving by … driving!
* That and having to live with the knowledge of what they’ve done…