According to a story today on Onlyfinance.com the nation’s cycle commuters are all doomed! DOOMED! I TELL YOU! Alright maybe it’s not that apocalyptic but we are all sitting on a “Compensation timebomb”. Mind you that warning does seem to come from James Pickering, chief Exective of Cycleguard – a bike insurance provider. The gist of the argument is that there’s been massive rise in the number of commuting cyclists, particularly in London, and a subsequent rise in the number of accidents involving cyclists and pedestrians which must mean a possible increase in levels of third party claims against cyclists. Possibly. Speaking to Onlyfinance.com James Pickering, Managing Director of Cycleguard, said: "Most cyclists don’t give third-party insurance any thought. Cycling is safe and healthy, but it’s dangerous to ignore the threat of legal action in the event of an accident. Although some household insurance policies offer a degree of third-party cover, many exclude road traffic accidents." Cycleguard also encouraged bicycle riders to think about taking out personal liability insurance, which can help them financially, should they need to pay for legal fees or with compensation claims. Mr Pickering added: "You wouldn’t dream of getting in a car without some sort of insurance in case you get badly injured, so why people think this is any different for cyclists is beyond me." Well one reason might be that the chances of being badly injured on a bike are actually quite small – cycling is one of the safest pastimes there is with a death rate on a par (excuse the pun) with golf. And conversely the more people that cycle the safer it gets. While the numbers of people injured by cyclists might be rising, might, if it is it is doing so from a tiny base. The numbers of people killed by cyclists in the UK is also small, the average is less than one death a year, you are about as likely to be killed by a skateboard. Compulsory insurance for cyclists would therefore be a nice little earner for the insurance industry – particularly as the premiums currently being charged, although they appear low when you think about the risk to the insurer of actually having to pay out on them, compared to, say, motor insurance, might actually be quite high. One other point the insurance industry don’t address: if cycling is so dangerous, and if such a tiny proportion of today’s cyclists have third party cover – why aren’t we already hearing loads of stories about cyclists being sued? If you’ve got a valuable bike, making sure it is covered by insurance seems a bit of a no-brainer, and equally some sort of third party cover is probably a good idea for everyone not just cyclists, but it has got to be at a price the reflects the actual risk of a claim. If you are in the market for insurance Cycleguard’s Roadcare policy offers third party cover and a measure of personal injury cover for £26 per year which in the current market is not a bad deal. Insurance is also an integral part of both British Cycling’s and CTC’s membership package. Gold membership of BC includes a full racing licence, loads of other benefits, third party cover, legal advice, and personal injury cover – senior Gold membership costs £62, there’s a family Gold package for £134. Everyday Cycling (British Cycling’s offshoot for non-competitive cyclists) offers membership for £2 a month which amongst other benefits includes £10 million of third party cover and legal advice should you have an accident. All CTC members are covered by £10 million third party insurance and 24 hour legal advice. Standard membership is £35, family membership £57.
- News

Insurers warn of cycle commuter “Compensation time bomb”

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
2 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
"carefully/slowly weaving through some cars ...... and while trying to squeeze through the last bit" Maybe its just me but maybe these are the lines that start off the driver on the irrational road rage, Yes we are allowed to filter through traffic but sometimes a bit of patience is required too. If you are ending up so close that you are making contact with someone else's property then maybe just hold back a little until there is space. I am not attempting to justify or suggest that the response was proportionate but lets be honest the chances are that the OP may have played down thier own actions that triggered the nutter.
The 15.5mph (25kph) limit is stupid? What's stupid is charging down mixed use paths on an untested, illegal e-moto at 40 mph. Which is what these wastes of organs do.
@kyzyl2 I'm extremely sceptical that this app could measure power with any accuracy, but as far as I understand it is not the case that it completely ignores windspeed; as the inventor says, it uses weather as one of the variables. Presumably it takes real-time wind speed and direction from nearby weather stations and factors that into its calculations. Of course this may be wildly inaccurate if you're climbing up a bare hillside and the nearest weather station is in a sheltered valley half a mile away, but it does make some attempt to account for wind speed and direction.
@Rendel Harris we used to rent an allotment in a village near Basel and there was an annual autumn party/festival organised by the gardeners. One year as we were about to leave we went to ride our (unlocked - never a need here) bikes and my wife’s was missing. Our allotment neighbours were outraged and were getting ready to get the police in when… up the road rides a gentleman on my wife’s bike, weaving around in a drunken manner.. He gets back and receives the wrath of our neighbour (not us we were in giggles) and he explains that he had to go home to feed his cat and just needed to borrow a bike!
The physics principle exploited is that opposing forces equal applied forces. Conventional power meters measure applied forces--very well but admittedly not cheaply. This app appears to measure acceleration and slope to determine two of four important opposing forces. Notice something missing? Wind...the dominant opposing force when riding on the flats or in a pack. This app assumes that wind speed equals bike speed in order to "guess" the critical opposing wind force it does not measure. If you always ride solo and never ride when the wind blows maybe this app will work OK for you. Otherwise you are wasting your money. There is no such thing as free power.
Not gonna lie, when I saw the name LAP I thought 'Here we go again, yet another pretentious brand like MAAP, PNS, ASOS and Rapha that wants to grab a piece of the 'bragging rights' cycling category. But, to my surprise, what they bring to the table seems pretty well considered. Let's see if this idea gets some traction.
The difference in the UK is that the police don't try to hide their pride in paying no attention to bicycle theft, in order to maintain credibility with their motorhead mates. When the British Transport Police actually declared they weren't interested (OK, there were some provisos to that, but what they really meant was: cyclists can get stuffed) in cycle theft, they were forced to retract that officially but continued in practice to teach cyclists a lesson by making no effort to catch the thieves (I assume - no personal experience of this particular police-encouraged crime wave)
Might have been usefull to describe the bike / brand etc..?
Operation "Sorry Not Attempting Prosecution"? Certainly some forces see it as a success!
2 thoughts on “Insurers warn of cycle commuter “Compensation time bomb””
Surely the main reason most
Surely the main reason most people wouldn’t dream of getting in a car that wasn’t insured is because it’s illegal to drive one without insurance? Bet if it wasn’t a legal requirement there’d be plenty of people who would get in one (plenty drive uninsured now), most of us don’t think we are going to have a crash whenever we get into our cars
I’ve had to pay out
i had to pay £400 to some woman once to repair her Volvo after i ran in to the back of her when i was cycling with the flu (not recommended). that’s in 20 years of cycling which would have cost me at least £500 in cover, looking at the figures quote above. so i guess i’m up on the gig so far…