- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
42 comments
And you know all this because...?
i took it as a joke on the oft repeated stickers warning cyclists not pass these vehicles because of blind spots which are nothing more then excuses of ‘well we warned them’.
I deduced it was a joke about cyclists and the highway code by carefully analysing the use of the words 'cyclists' and 'highway code'.
Totally agree my sense of humour for that kind of stuff has long been worn out by repeatedly being near missed by objects that can kill me and no one giving a damn to fix it
I’ve just contacted the company asking them to explain their bigoted views regarding the passive aggressive van sticker. I think others should do the same.
PP
they have another van with the words ‘Caution, blindly following SatNav”. I would suggest that the stickers are to take the piss of all road users plus publicity and advertising of the design company.
Why?
I wonder if that company went to the trouble of actually creating a sticker just for their vans, given the nature of their business and how 'non-standard' it looks (they certainly didn't just buy it in Office World). And, has been said, how best to reply "Yes, thanks; next?"...
In answer to Señor Chris on how to reply to J B H Design. Thank you for sharing the web address. On their web site they give their telephone number and email (and contact form). Perhaps they are so interested, every cyclist should let them know?
I also wonder if cycleoptic obtained the image from a close pass by the van; in which case they may need reminding of rule 163 - because it looks like a close pass. Of course, cycleoptic may be filtering and they could be reminded of that rule.
I wonder when everyone at J B H Design last read (if ever) the Highway Code?
If you take advice from the Telegraph then think again. Anecdote and individual experience is not evidence.
Wear a helmet if you want to but never read the Telegraph.
And of course its behind a paywall/register-wall so you can't accidentally read the web version.
It popped up on my MSN news feed. I thought it'd kick off another lengthy helmet debate to be honest.
Pages