The live blog isn’t always quick to load. Please be patient and if you really don’t think it’s going to appear, try refreshing the page.
- News

Live blog: “Empty” cycle lanes; Student to try and everest Dundee Law; UCI introduces sock height rule for 2019 + more

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
15 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
The HSE has undoubtedly reduced injuries in the work place. Why shouldn't some of the principals / evidence they've gathered in achieving this be run out to the public. It's really just common sense.
"If London can do it, Exeter can too" While ignoring that London would now have the cycle path having priority OR install traffic lights requiring drivers regularly stop. They pretty much never require the cycle path give way to cars on a parallel carriageway now. Something to do with the idea that drivers know they are crossing the cycle path and the most common case is them approaching from behind at higher speeds than the majority of cyclists can achieve...
@lemonenema Sorry about that and thanks for the spot... fixed!
@mdavidford "Hmm – the way you’ve edited your post to tone down the suggestion that they were saying something they weren’t suggests even you don’t believe that." Nope, and tbh, I couldn't care less about what you think. Anything positive to add? Nope! just your usual nonsense, so bore off.
@mdavidford OK. So maybe my question should be amended to: are those rates ring-fenced? ie, I'm not paying a lot more for my insurance due to drivers of larger/more dangerous/more expensive vehicles andor the drivers with points.
Hmm - did the people whose data is in that 'substantial database' agree to that? Nothing in their privacy statement says "we may flog off your data to a random third party".
Insurance cost already does vary with vehicle and associated risk profile though.
Hmm - the way you've edited your post to tone down the suggestion that they were saying something they weren't suggests even you don't believe that.
Thanks. I'd heard that there was a split in the community. Well in that case let's hope that he does do something about their opposition to cyclists. All for safe cycling measures, but not just because one group doesn't like cyclists.
Being fair, there are a few councillors of all shades who seem intent on not disturbing their preexisting opinions on certain topics with new facts or understanding. I do think the populist parties are more susceptible to this though. They seem to attract those with the idea that government is corrupt and it just needs some people with "common sense" to come in and fix it. They *are* right that there's inefficiency, inflexibility, self-serving and even some corruption there. The error is in thinking that a) those are the biggest issues and b) inexperienced people with strong opinions (and sometimes cloth ears) can quickly change it for the better...
15 thoughts on “Live blog: “Empty” cycle lanes; Student to try and everest Dundee Law; UCI introduces sock height rule for 2019 + more”
UCI introduces sock height
UCI introduces sock height rule for 2019
I think it’s great that the UCI have solved all the important problems in regulating pro cycling and can now move on to trivial stuff like this
Yep I saw that about sock
Yep I saw that about sock heights on the Cycling Weekly website, what a load of horseshit. I mean, the excuse about riders getting marginal aerodynamic gains comes across as utter drivel with regard to socks.
In BMX we have other stupid rules foisted on us from the UCI, like racers not being allowed to wear jeans any more.
OldRidgeback wrote:
The aerodynamic gains from long socks are well documented and the UCI are just making sure riders in time trial stages don’t end up looking like a lot of the UK’s domestic testers with socks up to their knees!
Mark.
[/quote]
[/quote]
The aerodynamic gains from long socks are well documented and the UCI are just making sure riders in time trial stages don’t end up looking like a lot of the UK’s domestic testers with socks up to their knees!
Mark.
[/quote]
But long socks are available simply and cheaply to anybodt that wants them, so it’s not like they’d be getting an advantage that others wouldn’t be able to get such as with custom made handlebars etc
That tree is First Street,
That tree is First Street, Manchester outside Junkyard golf. It’s quite short but
iswas quite handy for turning left from Whitworth St onto Albion St (especially when lights at the junction are on red!).I used it all the time when commuting to/from Piccadilly (well, from – its useless from the other direction)
Now we sorted socks out I
Now we sorted socks out I think we need to move on to sunglasses.
Just been looking at the
Just been looking at the plans for the Chorlton route. Slightly annoying that there isn’t a zip file with all the PDFs rather than multiple clicks to get to each one in turn, but…
Initial thoughts are that its promising. One comment I have is that the ramps on Copenhagen style bus stops need to be less severe than the one in the example photo.
Would the student’s Everest
Would the student’s Everest attempt qualify if he’s riding a circuit rather than up and down the same hill?
MrB123 wrote:
I’d hate to see this young man waste his efforts on an attempt that won’t be ratified so let’s hope he’s read the rules.
mike the bike wrote:
Proper everesting can’t be done in a circuit, you have to go up and down the same hill, but if it’s for charity who cares!
mike the bike wrote:
He wouldn’t qualify for the grey stripe if he was doing circuits up the hill and down the other side
but he might just be interested in the donations and the challenge. Agree that i’d hope someone’s had word with him if he does want it to count officially as an everesting though, i’ll have a look and see if I can find him…
fukawitribe wrote:
He wouldn’t qualify for the grey stripe if he was doing circuits up the hill and down the other side
Given there’s only one road up “The law” itself he has to go up and down that, but depends where he’s starting from and I would guess that to get height that may be down at almost sea level by the river Tay.. Dundee is known as a veritable rats nest of one way systems thet they build (from memory) in the late 80s and early nineteys . . it’s rumoured some locals that went shopping in 1994 are still trying to find their way out the one way system in the centre of town.
mike the bike wrote:
You mean his socks might be illegal?
Shouldn’t that tree have a
Shouldn’t that tree have a sign “Merry Christmas to all cyclists”?
UCI obviously just ratifying
UCI obviously just ratifying “The Rules”