Please be patient if the live blog is slow to load. Try refreshing the page if it refuses to appear.
- News

Live blog: A good bike ride spoiled; Zwift art; a fifth of Aussie drivers admit experiencing cyclist road rage + more

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
20 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@FionaJJ These officers deployed next-level stupidity, and it must be difficult for the police to find people this dim. It doesn't even need rolling-roads or whatever, just a reputable bike computer on a quickly changed mount for the difficult cases where a proper EAPC has been modded, although you would need to look hard in Lancashire to find a police officer who knows how to make a pedal cycle go. Most illegal electric motorbikes are immediately obvious, not least because the crim is wearing a face mask. I saw an obvious one tonight coming out of Garstang Sainsbury's, not pedalling but without a face mask because everybody knows that the police only come into the town to hide away in the police station 200 yards away.
Gustav Gullholm.. that's not a good look mate
@Chris RideFar I think what you meant to say was "REMOVE this and put it on PODCAST CC".
As Mary Whitehouse never said - one doesn't have to read the article if one doesn't want to read about an off-road bicycle.
@FionaJJ In London they're allowed to stop on single and double yellows to deliver packages or empty pillar boxes; in practice they take this as carte blanche to park wherever and whenever they want, such as this chap on the Brixton Road who pulled into the bus/cycle/motorcycle lane without indicating, as I approached at 20mph, to park on a red route, response to a remonstrance, "I suppose you never get post delivered do ya?"
@Rendel Harris We have a pavement parking ban, but around here at least, royal mail vans are already exempt, subject to certain caveats, such as allowing at least 1.5m, and only being stopped to do their work.
It was already embarrassing for the police that they made such a mess of their attempt to determine whether a bike was legal or not, but I had assumed it was a group of well intentioned, but under-trained officers acting on their own initiative, having spotted something they thought looked not quite right. I'm now discovering this was a planned activity, something sufficiently organised to have been given a name - Operation FRISLEN, designed specifically to identify and remove illegal e-bikes and scooters. It's apparent that the officers were sent out without adequate training, never mind the kind of equipment that should be used for this sort of work. I'm not saying they always need specialist equipment to spot all illegal bikes, but at least if they'd been given a demonstration with that equipment, they'd have realised why their approach was not going to end well.
Have put drop bars on a 2001 B1 mtb, a 2007 stumpy hardtail and a 2010 stumpy full suss. In all cases fairly basic conversións leaving gearing and wheels broadly the same and concentrating on correct positioning of bars and fit. Oddly, with all 3 I was happy with the result when recently done, but after a few months found that the extra speed on easy trails was more than offset by the lack of ability (probably mine) on tougher routes and finally preferred flat bar with slammed and inverted stem as best overall compromise. Good fun playing around, though.
The photos in this review look they are for a different bag?
This is a strange reactionary knee jerk overall. But what is this "are essentially motorbikes in disguise" waffle? "One letter claimed that high-powered electric ‘e-bikes’ were “essentially motorbikes” in disguise, with many being used without lights, helmets, or any hi-vis clothing." Surely, they simply ARE motorbikes?
20 thoughts on “Live blog: A good bike ride spoiled; Zwift art; a fifth of Aussie drivers admit experiencing cyclist road rage + more”
From the videos we see from
From the videos we see from Oz, this isn’t going to surprise anyone, but the Guardian article doesn’t mention what the authorities are doing to correct this overt bias by drivers and makes it pretty clear that they are doing the sum of the square of sfa.
This isn’t just a problem in Oz, and as is evidenced every day in newspaper and web comments, the utter ignorance of drivers about road law is astounding, and must lead to questions about whether our current system of licencing is appropriate. If so many drivers are unaware of the law and put vulnerable road users at risk, the system isn’t working. Do we need regular re-testing, especially focussing on behaviour towards vulnerable road users?
From the Guardian (my
From the Guardian (my emphasis):
brooksby wrote:
I’m trying not to mention helmets, but I’m weakening fast.
[/quote]
[/quote]
I’m trying not to mention helmets, but I’m weakening fast.
[/quote]
In the conext that helmets are not the issue here I hope.
Supersam wrote:
I think its just very worrying that Australia mandated helmets to increase cyclists’ safety, and yet numbers of cyclist deaths are still increasing so drastically. Its almost as if wearing a helmet doesn’t have a very great effect on KSI statistics…
(
)
brooksby wrote:
Given the drops in cycling since the mid 80s and going further back to the early 50s when cycling was ridiculously safe in Australia http://www.cycle-helmets.com/cycling-1985-2011.html# they have fallen massively, and yet their government is even more ignorant of the issues than ours which is going some!
There are now calls for a 5 year test period for adults to cycle sans helmet but stupidly only off road, those 17 and under will still be forced to wear IF and that’s a big if the proposed changes get approval.
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:
you do realise the issue is more complex than a did they or didnt they wear a helmet question???
nigerian prince wrote:
You do understand that we know that.
You do understand that saying “there might be other issues” doesn’t change the point that such a massive increase in cyclist deaths in a country which mandated cycle helmets ostensibly to improve cyclist safety is a bit concerning…
brooksby wrote:
It’s an anti-BTBS sockpuppet, created by someone who’s already anonymous on an Internet forum. And, despite their username, I haven’t seen any offers to inherit millions yet. Just rude.
davel wrote:
honestly I’ve had it with the vitriol on this site. It’s a sad place, for sad middle aged men shouting into the digital abyss. Fucking losers, the lot of you.
nigerian prince wrote:
You think this site is full of vitriol? Don’t ever venture to the comments section of the Mail Online then especially with that user name (then again it might blow their minds – on one hand Nigerian = non white immigrant, on the other Prince = Royalty)
nigerian prince wrote:
you do realise you’re now shouting into the digital abyss?
nigerian prince wrote:
I love a good flounce, but that was average.
nigerian prince wrote:
Goodbye and thank you for going.
burtthebike wrote:
Just think how much worse it would be if they hadn’t mandated helmets?
(Sorry, but not sorry)
burtthebike wrote:
I thought I’d leave that can of worms well alone…
brooksby wrote:
So one in four accidents led to a prosecution, or at least some sort of trial, of driving without due care and attention?
moved to Aus’ 5 years ago and
moved to Aus’ 5 years ago and my experience is some drivers really go out of their way to inform cyclists how much they hate them in a very threatening way – as well as attitude and distraction drugs and driving are a real problem and feature in many serious collisions – driving is an absolute right and driving at or a few km/hr above the speed limit is essential …if looking at urban cycling like to quote this study – experienced cycle commuters in Canberra review of video of daily commutes …from the summary:
“No collision events were recorded. A total of 91 potentially unsafe cyclist-interactions were identified. In the majority of events (93.4%), the behaviour of the driver led to the event. The most common event type was left turn (37.3%) which involved a driver turning left across the path of the cyclist, drivers turning across cyclists’ path from the adjacent direction (32.9%). Unexpectedly opened vehicle doors accounted for 17.6% of cyclist-driver interactions. In the majority of all events, a crash was avoided due to the evasive actions taken by cyclists.”
Bold added by me – original is large pdf here:
https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/217306/muarc322.pdf
like to think that very very slowly police are realising Aus’ is way out of step but maybe I’m too hopeful
Chilled out pup!
Chilled out pup!
I was just about to send you
I was just about to send you my account number, Alanis…