Former Team Sky doctor asked to leave World Cup in Manchester

Or "at all guilty".

As for the records, I'm unsure. The rules of cycling and wada didn't require them at this time. Look at something like the NHS and tell me that everything is kept 100% secure and reliable...

@philtregear Nobody was found "entirely innocent", that's one of the main points of the inquiry.

Doctors must keep records of what they do professionally, regardless of their employment status. Not being able to understand a computer system, losing a laptop etc. are not credible reasons for a doctor not to be able to provide records of what he has done in his professional life. Let us imagne a situation whereby several athletes died whilst under the care of such a doctor. Post mortems suggested that  various dangerous drugs had been assimilated into their bodies. Would the CPS accept that the doctor was entirely innocent because he could not provide records of what he had or hadn`t prescribed? when and what blood tests or urine tests detected? How the general health of  these athletes changed and progressed leading up to their deaths? " Oh, I lost those records" says the doctor. " Oh, we didn`t have the right systems in place to ensure they were backed up" apologises the team manager. How would we think about such practises?  For the doctor, at best, that is extreme negligence. For the team, at best, that is accessory to manslaughter.That is precisely how we should judge Brailsford et al. They were awash with money. They had no excuse not to get this right. The rest is just a fog.

Thanks Drosco, quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit.

And a cunt.

Lot of sky fan boys on this page

Mattie, possibly if British Cycling owned the velodrome but they do not.

You also have to question, knowing BCs lack of abilities, whether he actually counted as an employee and whether he'd been informed he was being investigated and where he was or wasn't welcome...

Good on the Daily Mail for taking the moral high ground...

Way to go on overstepping your authority, he should have told her to mind her own business. Whilst she is obviously a nice safe appointment for BC she has shown that she can do a job in male dominated environments, however acting out of turn based on nothing more than conjecture and no conviction/actually being guilty of anything is just wrong.

Despite all the above comments, if, as the article states, he was being investigated on employment grounds and would have been subject to disciplinary action had he not been too unwell, then I'd guess BC have every right to ask him to leave the building. Hardly controversial!

-The paper said: “It is believed Harrington, while powerless to eject Freeman from a public building, questioned the wisdom of him being there and said it would be better if he went. Freeman did not depart immediately but he was not seen again at the venue that weekend.”

So he was asked to leave - though the commitee found no wrongdoing - he then didn't leave, until he left, after which he had left. Quoting the DM, really, is this journalism? Yeez, this article blows hot and cold. Or just blows.

Somehow I expect better from this site. "Disgraced" is not accurate is it?! If he is disgraced then Wiggins is too but that is not the case as far as I understand it. I don't recall you referring to Wiggins in that way.

What a Nazi.

WTAF?

Why is he disgraced?

He did keep records (though he wasn't required to) the records were stolen.

Why are people obsessed with a type of envelope?

Who the fuck thinks they can evict someone from a public building?