- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
10 comments
New Strava segment up for grabs!
Out of interest, does anyone know how wide the bridge bed is? We have a similar looking bridge down the road, sadly when it was built in the dim distant past it was only installed with a 1.5 metre wide bed (if that) and had [and still has] blue oblong 'Cyclist Dismount' signs at each end...
Causes no end of challenges...
Grrr....bridges. We hate bridges. We hate them with gardens and no cycle lanes and we hate them with cycle lanes and no gardens. Grrr. Etc.
I never liked the scheme, a single flagship scheme like this is never going to make any difference to cycling numbers and is a lot of money. But having cycled over it last night, its a nice bridge.
Its shared use which is not good but all the access routes are shared as well and it very specifically isn't part of a strategy to provide for cycling. It connects to the area round the station which is the same: loads of room therefore shared use. I think it was originally a walking bridge that they couldn't quite manage to stop bikes using. Reading cycling campaign might be negative and tired but its hard to describe how anti cycling Reading council and specifically Tony Page really are.
If you had 5.9 million and were serious about cycling in Reading then there are lots of things you would do first, bridge capacity (for cycling) is not really a problem, they just need to be a bit more inventive to utilize whats there to reduce the river/road/rail line severance problem in that area.
To be fair they are pretty anti-car and everything else, except buses. This obviously has nothing to do with the Council owning the local bus company.
Who wants all those elderly and disabled people strutting about on level pavements like they own the place!!!
Positive comment from Reading cycle campaign, as ever!
5.9m could have done a lot more for some sort of Local Sustainable Transport. RBCs spending of this money has been a joke. We've got enormous traffic signs saying which car parks are full that occasionally say "Ride a Bike". We've got a bike hire scheme that completely ignores anything west of the town centre. They've replaced pavements and cleaned statues. Pretty much anything except cycling or walking infrastructure.
Best of luck with the Separate lanes it never worked on Gatesheads Millennium Bridge (despite the local authorities best efforts) and became ped lane on one side shared use on the other.
I'm in two minds about separate lanes for cyclists and pedestrians. Separate lanes can work well for long stretches where pedestrians can learn to stay on their side, but for short stretches having no lanes can force cyclists to moderate their speed and expectations.
When there's separate lanes, I find that I get less tolerant of pedestrians even though they have priority (on either side of the line, no less). Where there's just a shared path with no lanes, I go slower and am far more observant of the peds to watch out for those erratic walkers and feel less aggravated with their lack of awareness.