Electric bikes were big again at Eurobike, and every year they seem to get bigger. It’s a trend much more noticeable on, and driven by, continental Europe but we still see its effects filtering through to Blighty. So what’s happening? Electric bikes are getting better No doubt about it, the technology has come a long way from the 40kg behemoths that used to pass for electric bikes five years ago. To see how far technology has come I had a spin on the top-of-the-range (2,800 Euros) Diamant, a Trek sub-brand that’s distributed in Germany and Austria.
What’s refreshing from the outset about this bike is that it’s obvious that without the battery and associated gubbins it’s a well-thought-out and competent city cruiser. You get a well made Aluminium frame, decent rigid forks with a small headshok-type damper, sensible wheels and new LX running gear. It’s the kind of upright urban steed you might expect to weigh maybe 26-28lb. With the battery, motor and controls the total weight is considerably higher at 46lb, but it’s still a perfectly manageable bike even with the motor turned off.
Add some power and it really comes to life. The bike uses the Pedelec system (it adds to your pedal input) and there’s four levels of assistance, from 25% to 200% of pedal power. Braking is regenerative, helping to charge the battery, and there’s also four charge settings for longer downhills, or if you just want to make life difficult for yourself. On the full power setting it was so impressive that I had to stop to confirm with the Diamant guys that it really was just a road legal 250W motor; on the continent electric bikes can be twice as powerful, but need to be licensed.
Obviously this is a high-end machine with a price tag to match – the scarcity of Lithium Ion batteries isn’t helping to make these bikes affordable at the moment – but there were plenty of other good-looking bikes on show for a lot less; I also had a spin on a mid-range Trans-X Pedelec bike that was very likeable if not as impressive as the Diamant. Pedelec seems to be the system of choice right across the board now, and twist-shift systems appear to be losing favour.
On the retrofitting front the Bionx system was all over the place as well, fitted to all sorts of bikes including the Specialized Roubaix at the top of the page that they wouldn’t let me have a go on. A modified version of Bionx is also the power behind the new electric Birdy – more on that later… And the bad news? Well, mainly that there’s too much faffing around with the actual bike design when all that’s really needed is a light and efficient way of adding power to what we already know are the most sensible bike shapes. We don’t need shaft drives, nor unusual frames; these things just add weight without giving any operational advantage. Similarly there’s a big obsession with front and rear suspension, which is even more unnecessary on a town bike on the continent than it is over here. Just fit some bigger tyres, and do us all a favour: the systems are generally rubbish, and it’s just more mass to push around.
There was plenty of ‘urban utility vehicles’ knocking about too, basically motorbikes of one description or another with their petrol innards replaced by electric ones. I can’t help feeling that this is a hiding to nothing: it’s not as if the world can’t cope with a few 50cc mopeds pootling into town, and I’m yet to be convinced that firing up some manner of power station to supply the energy to charge the battery of said electric moped is better than a tiny petrol engine anyway. Having said, I’ve got a lot of time for the e-Bikeboard scooter, simply because it’s such tremendous fun. Sadly, I think it’s too powerful to be legal in the UK…
- News

Electric Bikes – the future?

Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
No Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@DrG82 is a liar. First off, who here said they got everything right? "I wouldn’t say that the Welsh government got everything right." The article contains commentary saying they didn't get everything right. I suppose saying something obviously true sets you up to lie later... "They applied the speed limit changes uniformly, without considering exceptions" You are a liar. The Welsh Government guidance contained rules that would allow councils to exempt roads from 20mph. As an example, much of my route into town stayed at 30 and 40mph because my council bothered to apply the exemptions. I particularly enjoyed your unsupported claim of "This has been a massive waste of money". The article states "collisions involving all road users on 20mph and 30mph are down 37 per cent, with casualties dropping by 35 per cent". I'd say a one-off cost of changing road signs for a permanent 1/3rd reduction in collisions is gonna save the taxpayer a chunk of healthcare costs and owners and businesses a chunk of money not fixing car bodywork. Nothing but contempt for you. Take your lies elsewhere.
With so many people using and looking at mobie phones whilst driving and other distractions, may I suggest you always wear Hi viz and stay at home.
The design of the "car" has played a role in this. SUVs and what the Americans call "trucks" are exempt from the pedestrian safety regulations which apply to passenger cars. Had the victim been hit by a car designed in the past twenty years he would have been "scooped" onto the bonnet and either over the roof or off to one side. Still a serious injury risk and potentially fatal but they have the benefit of those passive safety systems to improve their chances. With vehicles with such a high bonnet line as this Volvo has what tends to happen is the person bounces off the bonnet and falls on the road in front of the vehicle where they're then run over. This has happened time and time again and is becoming more of an issue as the numbers of vehicles exempt from the safety standards grows.
@Accessibility for all Reducing the speeds wouldn't have helped in this case as the driver was reported doing 65 in a 40 zone on the approach to the junction, his driving described by the witnesses as erratic and evidently had no intention to stop to give way even though he had been warned by the passenger who apparently shouted "bike" three times just before the collision. He would have likely flown through that junction even if it was traffic light controlled with a red light for him at the time. In my own experience the entire area i.e. east of Lymm towards Warburton and along Dunham Road all the way up to Altrincham and past into Hale Barns, all those wealthy, posh settlements around Manchester Airport are best avoided by road cyclists. A disproportionally high number of psycho drivers must for some reason live in that area because every single time I went there on my road bike in the past, I either got harassed myself or witnessed proper dickhead driving - speeding, close passes, overtaking into oncoming traffic or round a blind bend, accelerating towards pedestrians already crossing the road, you name it. I gave up road cycling in that area years ago and only use the local TPT these days.
In respect of the murder charge: based on him hitting Mr Mullins and making no attempt to help him (this killing him), how would the case compare to a hit and run driver who seriously injures or kills a cyclist, knowingly, and flees the scene without helping? Would this make the cut for a murder charge? Or is there something very different going on here that I’m missing? Genuinely curious because I don’t recall there being a murder charge before for this kind of thing unless it was premeditated. In fact, in my experience most cases like this seem to go the opposite way - where the driver can merely say the sun was in their eyes and get away with a slap on the hands.
@Rendel Harris...and there was me dishing out the praise!
@polainm He must also be an already hardened criminal. It wasn't mentioned during the court proceedings to avoid influencing the jurors and ensuring he had a fair trial, but he had been released from prison shortly before this incident and was couch surfing at his cousin's house days before. Just look at his face, he's only 35, but looks older than his victim who was 56. Must have spent half his adult life in prison.
@jaymack They did offer him manslaughter though but he declined to plead guilty. Without wanting to seem curmudgeonly, yes great that they preferred the most serious charges but hard to see how they could have done differently considering that Richardson got out of the car, saw Mr Mullins was stuck underneath and then got back in and carried on. That clearly moved it above anything that falls under death by dangerous driving.
@thrawed Agree - the UK winters are utterly grim; grey, wet & windy. Not the type of weather you really want to go out and ride. Everything get covered in filth, and takes time to clean it after a ride. Oh for colder, drier & crisper days which can be enjoyable to be out in.
@ymm In my view, lax sentencing of dangerous drivers, especially where cyclists are involved, makes the judge, jury and CPS complicit in UK driver culture. This driver is a sociopath.