Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bloody cyclists on the pavement (not)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_TxH0IEr6Y

I've seen some mad things in my time on the road, but I don't think I've ever been overtaken in this manner.  Perhaps we can raise this video's profile and get the police interested?

Just for the record, I completely support the velo user's road position and right to be there.  I don't think he's done anything wrong, not even slightly.

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

22 comments

Avatar
FatBoyW | 8 years ago
0 likes

I don't understand why it has to be sent to the police - if they saw someone burgling your house would they wait for you to report it to take action?

 

Clearly a nutter who should be detained at her majesty's pleasure

Avatar
ktache | 8 years ago
2 likes

Ah, but I will never suffer fools gladly...

Avatar
Leviathan | 8 years ago
1 like

More importantly it is nice to see some one still driving a Sinclair C5, and saving on battery life too.

Avatar
rjfrussell | 8 years ago
1 like

The comments on the youtube site are even more astonishing than the pass itself.

Avatar
nowasps replied to rjfrussell | 8 years ago
1 like

rjfrussell wrote:

The comments on the youtube site are even more astonishing than the pass itself.

 

I think it's what they're calling  Populism.

 

 

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to nowasps | 8 years ago
1 like

nowasps wrote:

rjfrussell wrote:

The comments on the youtube site are even more astonishing than the pass itself.

I think it's what they're calling  Populism.

Its certainly an "ism" of some sort...

Avatar
HowardR | 8 years ago
1 like

A similar thing happened to me a couple of weeks back. Traveling along a quite single track lane of the sort where the only traffic you’ll normally meet is families with children & dogs all over the road, tractors, or kids being  led on donkeys.

The wind was blowing an unremitting hoolie from straight  ahead and coming towards the top of a slight rise I check behind (all clear), slow to about 10mph for a bit of a respite, look behind again (all clear) move to the middle of the road to avoid a pile of horse shit,  blowing a bijou snot rocket as I do so – and: FuckKK Me!!! I’m dead  & it hasn’t registered yet  – Some twunt in a 4X4 pick up (of the type that has blacked out windows) as passed me with millimetres to spare at 30-40 mph, half on the road and half off it.

His speed can’t just have been part of my shocked imaginings as he could only have taken a couple of seconds (at most) to cover the distance I’d just checked back over

Looking behind ‘down’ the straight bit of road from here:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.075371,-0.0900763,3a,75y,173.89h,87.7t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s4hXLZreCApxRnbUmO6IpTw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Just - Why????

Avatar
psling | 8 years ago
0 likes

Some juicy comments on YouTube 

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to psling | 8 years ago
2 likes

psling wrote:

Some juicy comments on YouTube 

By 'juicy' you mean Daily Mail.

Avatar
psling replied to Yorkshire wallet | 8 years ago
0 likes

Yorkshire wallet wrote:

psling wrote:

Some juicy comments on YouTube 

By 'juicy' you mean Daily Mail.

 

Makes the dm look like a nunnery newsletter.

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 8 years ago
1 like

What. The. 

 

Was not expecting that at all. 

 

Got the plate nice and clear, easy one for the police, not that they'll bother.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 8 years ago
1 like

"The other vehicle only had two wheels on the highway and was therefore classed as a bike and no action will be taken" - the police.

 

 

Avatar
ktache | 8 years ago
0 likes

But they posted it on youtube so it ceases to be a crime.

And we didn't see two minutes before the incident so maybe there was provication.

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid replied to ktache | 8 years ago
1 like

ktache wrote:

But they posted it on youtube so it ceases to be a crime.

And we didn't see two minutes before the incident so maybe there was provication.

Prat

Avatar
ktache replied to Russell Orgazoid | 8 years ago
5 likes

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

ktache wrote:

But they posted it on youtube so it ceases to be a crime.

And we didn't see two minutes before the incident so maybe there was provication.

Prat

What is it about this site that some posters have to take everything literally.

Every syllable of my comments on this story have dripped with sarcasm.

I will refuse to use emoticons, will never use textspeak and will endeavor not to swear.  These are the rules I had set myself when I decided to start commenting on this site.  I had hoped not to enter into any arguements with anyone, not even with Applecart, but your refusal to even consider to read my comment in the style in which it was intended has forced me into replying.

My post was was an attempt at satire, and a comment on some police forces' rules on accepting video evidence.

I would love to be able to cite the bit about not going any further if a video was posted on social media, might have been on here, but it could have been on Bez's excellent Beyond the curb, or the equally good As easy as riding a bike.  Some forces have made this declaration, it shouldn't change the way evidence is used, unless there is serious injury involved I cannot see any of these cases going in front of a Jury.

The two minute thing came from http://road.cc/content/news/212515-metropolitan-police-beta-testing-vide... I don't know why there is the two minute rule, there can be no justification for this sort of awful driving, but the thread came to the conclusion about provication.

I apologise for my comment going that far over your head, but with your comment on Tour de Celeb "I'd like to bust all over Amy Williams's face" I had always considered you quite low brow.

Avatar
ClubSmed replied to ktache | 8 years ago
0 likes
ktache wrote:

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

ktache wrote:

But they posted it on youtube so it ceases to be a crime.

And we didn't see two minutes before the incident so maybe there was provication.

Prat

What is it about this site that some posters have to take everything literally.

Every syllable of my comments on this story have dripped with sarcasm.

I will refuse to use emoticons, will never use textspeak and will endeavor not to swear.  These are the rules I had set myself when I decided to start commenting on this site.

Until there is a sarcasm font you will either have to use emoticons to convey this or suffer people misinterpreting what you say.

Avatar
beezus fufoon replied to ClubSmed | 8 years ago
3 likes

ClubSmed wrote:
ktache wrote:

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

ktache wrote:

But they posted it on youtube so it ceases to be a crime.

And we didn't see two minutes before the incident so maybe there was provication.

Prat

What is it about this site that some posters have to take everything literally.

Every syllable of my comments on this story have dripped with sarcasm.

I will refuse to use emoticons, will never use textspeak and will endeavor not to swear.  These are the rules I had set myself when I decided to start commenting on this site.

Until there is a sarcasm font you will either have to use emoticons to convey this or suffer people misinterpreting what you say.

really? you don't say!

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to ClubSmed | 8 years ago
6 likes
ClubSmed wrote:
ktache wrote:

Plasterer's Radio wrote:

ktache wrote:

But they posted it on youtube so it ceases to be a crime.

And we didn't see two minutes before the incident so maybe there was provication.

Prat

What is it about this site that some posters have to take everything literally.

Every syllable of my comments on this story have dripped with sarcasm.

I will refuse to use emoticons, will never use textspeak and will endeavor not to swear.  These are the rules I had set myself when I decided to start commenting on this site.

Until there is a sarcasm font you will either have to use emoticons to convey this or suffer people misinterpreting what you say.

Fortunately nobody ever misses sarcasm in comments on this site.

Avatar
Kapelmuur | 8 years ago
7 likes

I did a spell as a lollipop man when I retired.

One of the most alarming incidents was when I had the traffic halted and a car drove along the pavement to get past, scattering children and their parents as it went.

I got witness statements from parents and reported the incident to the police.   No action was taken.

I resigned shortly afterwards.

 

Avatar
ktache | 8 years ago
2 likes

Yes, but the driver didn't cross the white line so it must be alright.

 

Avatar
OnTheRopes | 8 years ago
2 likes

I hope this was sent in to the police, on the pavement round a blind bend also endangers pedestrians.

Avatar
DaveE128 replied to OnTheRopes | 8 years ago
0 likes
OnTheRopes wrote:

I hope this was sent in to the police, on the pavement round a blind bend also endangers pedestrians.

I'm surprised anyone thought of this!  3

Unbelievably dangerous! :-o

Not that it makes any difference at all, but I wonder out of curiosity how the velomobile's speed compared to the 10mph referenced in highway code rule 129?

Latest Comments