Had a scan yesterday. Not exactly sure what I was expecting, but this shouldn't have come as a surprise:
- Opinion
The brain of a cyclist

Add as a preferred source on Google
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
6 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
More Opinion
Latest Comments
@slownomad From the DVSA/DoT Guidance Notes that your link refers to: "To be classified as an EAPC under the EAPC regulations[footnote 1], the cycle must:" etc. . It then goes on to say: "If an EAPC does not comply with the regulations, it is treated as a motor vehicle under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and the Road Traffic Act 1988" So no, it does not say that the only EAPC is a legal EAPC. As you say bike may refer to pedal cycles or motorbikes. E-bike logically follows the same usage and includes EAPCs. "Electrically Assisted Pedal Cycle" is a technical description. The EAPC Regulations 1983 allow for some EAPCs to be treated in law as pedal cycles. The Guidance Notes finish with a disclaimer: "This guidance is a summary of DfT’s understanding of what the law requires." etc.. & finishes with "You are therefore advised to consult the relevant legislation and, if necessary, seek independent advice." So even the DVSA & DoT don't actually know what it all means.
Not noted in the review but the old Crux was a CX - gravel racer whereas this new one seems to be pure gravel, taking inspiration from road race bikes more than anything. What’s happening with specialized and CX? Is it just being left behind or is this the bike still for CX?
@RayG In my experience many of the people who attend overpriced events like these aren't genuine fans but people with high disposable incomes who like to go "for the experience" and to say that they were there. In any case, even if every ticket was sold to a dyed-in-the-wool cycling fan who was prepared to pay silly money because it's a once-in-a-lifetime chance to see the Depart in their home town/country, why would that make charging exploitative prices excusable?
The title of the review sounds almost as if it was the "tier number" you pay for, not the actual performance. I thought bikes were about riding, not bragging about them? If the bike is so great, what is the problem really?
@Rendel Harris I see the average cycling fan protested by snapping up the available tickets immediately.
@RayG Even if the ticket revenues for this event were all going straight into rider safety, which I'll wager they're not, there would still be perfectly relevant questions to be asked as to why the ordinary cycling fan was being stung for the cost rather than it coming out of ASO's €30M profit from the Tour alone and the €130M it makes annually from its race portfolio.
@Daclu Trelub I'm also wondering if they're putting matting down over the setts leading up to the esplanade - imagine the number of potential pre-race retirements if they try to ride slowly over them uphill if it's bucketing down that night! 🫣
@HoarseMann I considered that probability - Just expecting the prime 'mid-priced' seats to have already gone. Not to mention there'll likely be an even bigger strain on the terrible ticketing platform...
@wtjs I went to Clitheroe to watch them freezing their tits off in the rain after weeks of glorious weather. The crash on the lower slopes of Pendle was actually one of the police motorcycle marshals who slid out on the cattle grid on the bend at the foot of the straight climb to the Well Springs.
@saffronsimian dumbest comment of the century.

6 thoughts on “The brain of a cyclist”
Everything in order then.
Everything in order then.
Did I miss something here
Did I miss something here with the ‘Agony Guy’s’ posts? They appear to be recycled entries from his own seemingly largely unread blogs. I used to come to road.cc for good original views and writing. To be fair I still do on the the whole! But just not here. Or am I wrong??
Waste of time, space and
Waste of time, space and effort
Raleigh wrote:Waste of time,
That’s what the doctor said, too. Well, waste of space. “Some people have fit E=MC squared in there,” is how he put it. “You’re currently wondering which brake calipers look prettiest.”
PS. Poetic licence aside, that was a real brain scan. Serious stuff, in direct violation of my own user guide.
I love the comment at the
I love the comment at the bottom “Do not google and try to compare with ‘normal’ brains” brilliant.
That’s a real thing. This was
That’s a real thing. This was obviously a real brain scan at one time, and people who take them home always want to find and compare their heads with “normal” ones – and promptly freak out when they don’t have their own “ipod jack” and it must be abnormal!