Livall launches new Evo21 Smart Helmet with indicating lights

@neilmck Other studies have shown different results, however, e.g. a 2025 study in Barcelona showed injury rates on uni-directional cycle paths were slightly higher than on bi-directional ones - I'll post the link below as otherwise might end up in the black hole of link approval quarantine. The study you cite is from 1990 when in many areas cycle provision was very much in its infancy and drivers were much less accustomed to watching for cyclists in separate infrastructure than they are now. As ever, in my experience at least, the issue is not the cycle lane per se but junction design, with proper mitigating measures e.g. raised tables at junctions, different surface colours, warning signage, set back give ways etc there's no reason bidirectional lanes should be more dangerous.

Bi-directional cycle paths are very dangerous and councils should use extreme caution when deciding to install them. The problem is the complexity they provide motorists who have to cross them. There was a study made in Berlin that shows you are 12 times more likely to be killed at a crossing on a bi-directional cycle path than if you cycled on the road. https://www.bikexprt.com/bikepol/facil/sidepath/adfc173.htm

That - if it is like the photo - seems to be an inadequate and very poor entrance design. Where are the physical features to enforce behaviour? There will be a queue of cars sitting on the mobility track. The LHA could have CPOd a small slice of land to make it adequate and given a one or two car standing area by the carriageway with a bent-in mobility track. I'd say the designers have looked the other way.

I’m not sure this is a problem really. How often does the car boot sale take place?once a week at most, and not every week either? And not all day. I’m sure all users can manage and it would mean everyone taking car at the entrance / exit.

Many years since lived in Cheltenham but if the coach park is where I think it is there is another car park on the opposite side of Evesham rd also part of the race course and has an entrance off the main road and off a side road unlike the coach park it has no hard standing though ...

Ernest Hemingway was once sent off by his wife to buy a suit bag from a New York department store for an upcoming trip to Europe: the sales assistant showed him a top quality bag which, he assured him, could easily accommodate half a dozen suits. Hemingway explained, "Can afford bag. Can afford six suits. Can't afford both." I think this extraordinarily priced item would create the same problem, can afford through axle, or can afford a stand to attach to it, but...

Funny how opinions can differ. As a lifelong cyclist in The Netherlands (basically anything, from errands to daily commutes to cargo to mtb/gravel to bike messaging and bike packing) for over 4 decades, I've never missed a kickstand. There's just always something to lean my bike against, and apparently I am just very skilled at doing so, as my bike never tips over (pro tip: keep it almost vertical, and lean it with the rear *tire* against the pole/wall/tree etc.). Being a bike mechanic in my country means I deal with bikes with kickstands all the time, and I hate them. There's just about always something going on with them. They rattle, they have play because the bolts come loose, they creak, the black paint flakes off, the end cap gets lost, they are unstable. And of course, they are heavy, and ugly. And often quite expensive to boot.

I work at Decathlon as a bike mechanic in their Dutch service center, and products like this menstrual cycle bib shorts make me proud to work for them.

What an absolute dipshit that man is.

Feels like you're greeting an old friend there... Pretty sure that people driving motor vehicles often think that most others are "in the way" and that is generally the case for *different* transport modes "sharing space". No need to believe that infra will usher that in *! Indeed Calton Reid's work on the 1930s UK cycle path project (see britishcycletracks dot com) documents that the suspicions of cycle groups of the time eg. the Cycle Touring Club were correct - the planners *did* want cyclists off the roads! Of course the failure was not in providing cyclists with an alternative and trying to move them there but in letting the drivers of motor vehicles take the roads and streets over. Between heavy promotion / accommodation for drivers and the resulting unpleasant and dangerous conditions that resulted from so many humans driving, most people ditched the bike. Interesting to see where vehicular cycling folks fall: are they absolutist ("my right to ride on motorways")? Do they believe in "accidents" (or maybe the cyclists who die weren't ... skillful enough)? What do they think of all the others not riding - do they (apparently) not care ("I'm alright Jack"), do they think they're just weak / lazy, is it due to "dangerisation of a perfectly safe activity" (and if so why do many of them think that tiny active travel organisations manage to achieve this propaganda feat) etc.? * Aside what must be billions spent over the years on pro-driving lobbying, advertising etc. there's all that ancient human psychological kit of "us and them" and "detecting cheaters". Plus the fact that while cycling may have partly replaced horse riding the car has taken on its prestige / rank-marking function.