The Launch Edition of Kinesis’ new Aithein bike is now available.
We’ve been following the development of this bike over the past few months. First, we interviewed designer Dom Mason about the whole concept of this new lightweight alloy road bike, we saw a nearly-ready prototype, and then we showed you some spy shots of the finished article.
Kinesis have employed their new superplastic forming (SPF) process here, using higher temperatures and lower pressures than with hydroforming in order to produced thinner-walled tubes.
Kinesis say that the Aithein frame weighs as little as 1,041g – that's lighter than Cannondale's CAAD10, for example (Cannondale quote a frame weight of 1,150g). The monocoque carbon fork is 357g. The bottom bracket is a wide BB86 for the efficient transfer of power while the head tube is tapered with a 1 1/2in lower bearing for more rigidity up front..
The Launch Edition Aithein, available in limited numbers, has a special anodised finish using laser-etched graphics, metallic grey decals with lime detailing.
The standard finish frames will be following close behind. There will be two painted options finished in SickGreen metallic or SweetOrange metallic.
Kinesis have put a rider weight limit of 14st (89kg) on the Aithein which is available in five sizes from 47cm to 59cm
The price for the frame, fork and headset is £649.99.
For more info go to www.kinesisbikes.co.uk or www.upgradebikes.co.uk.
32 thoughts on “Kinesis launch Aithein in limited edition anodised finish”
Metallic grey….Mmm that
Metallic grey….Mmm that really gets me excited…
You need to see it in the
You need to see it in the flesh NeilXDavis . road.cc will be posting a ‘real’ pic soon, that one is a p.shop mockup.
This will look awesome in
This will look awesome in orange or green. So, Kinesis seem to fairly decent with you guys – any ETA on a review bike? I’m in the market for a new frame now, and think its reasonable to expect good levels of stiffness and handling, but also want to know its not going to beat me up on a 100 mile ride before I buy.
Hi notfastenough, road.cc
Hi notfastenough, road.cc will be the first to receive a review bike. The Aithein is designed primarily for speed, response, powerful climbing and aggressive descents, it’s not specifically made for comfort over distance [we have other frames in our range for this].
So it just depends where your priorities lie I guess, although we have had a few riders testing the p.types over many miles [road and race] with no complaints. In fact Oli, MD of Morvelo has swapped his carbon frame for one!
Mockups of the SweetOrange and SickGreen ones here > http://www.kinesisbikes.co.uk/products/racelight/aithein
Wow, figured you’d be
Wow, figured you’d be watching this thread Dom but didnt expect a response that quick! 🙂
I definitely prefer to get a move on, going on fast club runs/chain gangs/club 10’s/sportives etc. It will be my weekend/summer bike rather than anything more utilitarian. I’m just looking to find out whether I can live with it. To put it another way, it doesn’t need to be a Porsche with all the luxuries, but I’m not after a ridiculously focused F1 car either! 😀
Thanks for any advice.
We went through 5 p.types
We went through 5 p.types before settling on this one and I think it’s the best compromise of performance and comfort. Oli loves his and has been on plenty of long rides on it, although he really likes it for it’s direct feel and ability on punchy climbs and fast, twisty descents. The Aithein really is designed for the type of riding you describe, but substitute crits for sportives ; ]
Dom wrote:We went through 5
I don’t have the legs to substitute crits for sportives! I do wonder if the handling might be a bit towards the twitchy end of the spectrum? Also, are the stack and reach figures published? Sorry for the endless questions.
notfastenough wrote:Dom
The angles aren’t overly steep so it’s not twitchy, it feels nicely planted actually. It may be worth e.mailing Oli at Morvelo from the contact section on his site, he has spent a long time on the p.types and will be happy to chat re ride qualities.
Pic is updated now, by the
Pic is updated now, by the way.
Is the weight limit still
Is the weight limit still valid? I’m sure I read somewhere you were going to up that, or am I wrong?
(From someone the wrong side of that weight limit at the moment!)
othello wrote:Is the weight
Yes, weight limit still valid. Imposed by the factory. The frame is EN tested to industry standards.
Dom wrote:
Yes, weight limit
Ah, shame 🙁
I’m *just* over the limit and want to get under it, but wouldn’t want to risk it!
I still like the way my
I still like the way my Racelight RC2 rides so I imagine this will be awesome.
Rob
robert.brady wrote:I still
The RC2 is a great frame. Tempted to re-launch that one : ]
This is very light for
This is very light for aluminium. I’d be worried that the weight does make it too fragile, TBH
As there’s a rider weight limit, it seems kinesis are as well..
Don’t get me wrong, I love my Kinesis, it’s just I’ve had some experience of Alu frames breaking on me, including from kinesis itself
That said, their customer service and warranty is superb if anything does go wrong..
Don’t get the excitement.
Don’t get the excitement. What’s the advantage over carbon?
kiwiglider wrote:Don’t get
One of the main advantages is that price for price you are getting a top quality alloy frame rather than a budget carbon frame. It also means you can build up a high performance bike for less or maybe spend more on wheels etc rather than blowing the budget on the frame.
Carbon is brilliant and is an excellent material for bike frames, but it isn’t for everybody and a high-end alloy frame can quite often be better than an entry-level carbon frame of the same price.
Hope that makes sense.
I must admit I feel like I
I must admit I feel like I can trust ally more than carbon, and comfort is as much about the saddle, seat post and tyres (amongst other things) as the frame.
Might be interested if electronic compatible.
pmr wrote:I must admit I feel
Usually I would agree but that’s assuming aluminium is built to a certain strength, and will weigh a fair bit more.
In this case, they’ve built a frame that weighs the same a carbon one. the fact that they have imposed a rider weight limit suggests it may not have the same strength as other frames, or at least they’re being cautious..time will tell
You don’t usually get weight limits on frames, at least not at this level..
Also, you’re talking about seat posts being a factor in comfort, conventional wisdom suggests using carbon for this application anyway..
I think it’s an interesting exercise in manufacturing and material science, but other than that, I don’t really get the point..
700c wrote:pmr wrote:I must
Hi 700c, As technology moves on it allows us to take advantage of those advances in materials, forming and joining etc and apply them to the bike frame to evolve the way we do things. We have seen huge advances through the use of carbon fibre, it’s allowed designers to make the bike work in whole new ways and gain huge performance advantages. An alloy frame like the Aithein wasn’t worth considering 5yrs ago, but now frame forming technology, in this case ‘SPF’ [Superplastic Forming] has allowed us to make the seat tube that is the core of the frame. This SPF seat tube means that we can lighten up the rest of the frame tubes because the ‘torsional’ force on them is less. We have worked hard on the tube profiles, wall dimensions and diameters to ensure a balance of rigidity, ride quality and toughness.
The frame is EN tested to industry standards.
Carbon fibre is an excellent material for bike frames, but it’s not for everyone. Spending an equivalent amount on a carbon frame will get you a rather low-end, under developed and possibly dead feeling bike.
Hope this helps to explain where we are coming from with this frame.
Thanks Dom for taking the
Thanks Dom for taking the time to reply- it clarifies the purpose of this project and it’s good to see manufacturers talking directly to customers in this way
my views of aluminium are a little tainted following frame failures in the past which I won’t dwell on, but suffice to say I am now the proud owner of a Kinesis GF TI and would recommend it to anyone who cares to listen! Seems more than a match for my weight and riding style..
700c wrote:Thanks Dom for
No problem! Thanks for reading :] Glad you are enjoying your Racelight GF_Ti.
When is this vision of
When is this vision of wonderfulness going to be available to us minions Dom?
Karbon Kev wrote:When is this
Anodised Black ‘Launch Edition’ available now, but close to being sold out!
Painted version is following close behind and should be available next month.
Tiny Yellow version for minions, still under development.
Dom wrote:
Tiny Yellow
Is that a kids version? 😀
What about the orange and
What about the orange and sickgreen ones? Next month you say for those?
Karbon Kev wrote:What about
Ano ones were made first, the painted SickGreen and SweetOrange versions have just cleared paint finishing and I’m waiting for shipping info now.
Best Guess is mid August at moment [later than planned unfortunately]. We will probably fly the back-orders in to UK.
Isn’t that rather too similar
Isn’t that rather too similar in looks and spec – and Maximus seat post – to the Canyon Ultimate AL 9.0?
drmatthewhardy wrote:Isn’t
Well yeah, apart from all the main tube shapes, fork shape, Head tube, cable routing, graphics, geometry…
Do they make a Maximus seat post?
I think he means the squared
I think he means the squared off seat tube. Didn’t Canyon successfully sue cervelo for infringement with their sqouval seat tube?
http://road.cc/content/news/2
http://road.cc/content/news/29387-canyon-and-cerv%C3%A9lo-settle-patent-dispute
Think Cervelo ended up paying up/settling
Yes I meant the squared-off
Yes I meant the squared-off seat tube and was remembering the court case with Cervelo.
This frame does look lovely, and it’s lighter than the Canyon Ultimate AL. Tempted!