An Oxfordshire councillor is planning on cycling every day in the run-up to Christmas to raise money for the legal battle against a congestion charge.
Currently, motorists face a £5 charge for driving through six roads at certain times without a permit. This is a temporary charge to reduce traffic in the city during Network Rail’s closure of Botley Road.
According to the council, the congestion charge will reduce traffic, improve bus journey times and make it easier for people, such as carers and blue badge holders, to get around the city.
The new campaign group, Open Roads for Oxford, was set up to launch a legal challenge against Oxfordshire Council.
The online GoFundMe fundraiser has already raised over £9,000. This does not include direct donations for the campaign group.
Councillor David Henwood is cycling every day to raise money for the campaign. He said that if motorists couldn’t stop to donate, he would donate a pound for every car driver who beeps.

“I had some bemused looks today, along with some that thought I am plain nuts cycling in the rain,” he told the Oxford Mail.
“A younger David enjoyed the rain, but I must admit I struggled today.
“I went from Littlemore up to the Slade today and then turned left at the Headington Roundabout towards Headington and down through Hollow Way and back out onto the cycle track near Tesco’s and back to Littlemore.
“I will do the same route tomorrow as I’m not ready to do a complete lap of the bypass yet!”
Cllr Henwood is the group leader on Oxford City Council of the Independent Oxford Alliance. This party campaigns against Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and traffic filters.
In October this year, he was found to have harassed and bullied a Labour councillor, through posting “untruths” about her on social media.
The Oxford Clarion reports that he posted that the councillor, Trish Elphinstone, had “betrayed residents” through voting for the Rose Hill Controlled Parking Zone, despite there being no vote for a CPZ at Rose Hill.
They also reported that he shared a spoof image on social media, claiming that “bike users believe they know better than the rest of us” and “live in blissful ignorance or regard for the needs of others”.
He has vocally opposed the charge since it was announced. In the council’s public consultation, 74% of respondents said the scheme would have a negative impact.
Almost 14,000 people have also signed a petition against it.
The congestion charge is due to end when Botley Road reopens in August 2026.

A council spokesperson said, “The temporary congestion charge has been implemented to reduce traffic in the city during Network Rail’s extended closure of Botley Road, making journeys quicker, more connected, more flexible and more reliable.
“The county council will publish data about the scheme’s impacts during its first month of operation next week (Monday, December 8).
The road closure is due to a £161 million expansion of Oxford Station, which includes a new platform and western entrance, as well as significant improvements to the area beneath Botley Road bridge.
The temporary charge will be replaced by the traffic filter trial, where motorists will be fined up to £70 for driving through the same roads affected by the congestion charge.
The campaign also seeks to prevent the traffic filter trial from going ahead.
























22 thoughts on “Councillor raising funds for legal battle against congestion charge… by cycling”
I wonder if it’s occurred to
I wonder if it’s occurred to him (or any of the people who signed the petition) that he has worked out how to avoid the congestion charge.
I can see the headline now…
I can see the headline now…
“Xmas comes early for all motorists as councillor finds perfect solution to beating congestion charge“
And not forgetting, his campaign now shows that he is willing to cycle in poor weather when he and so many motorists would usually argue that won’t happen…
He needs some lube on that
He needs some lube on that chain…
ktache wrote:
A new chain would be better
Hanging a D lock on your
Hanging a D lock on your handlebars is asking for trouble.
It’s for easy reach when
It’s for easy reach when someone cuts you off /s
Or for easy reach when
Or for easy reach when someone calls him a c***
lesterama wrote:
Points out that he is one, surely?
Lovely story and lovely
Lovely story and lovely petition calling for a ” fight for the future of Oxford”.
Maybe they will see the light. That would make for a wonderfull christmas novel
It’s for easy reach when
<replied to wrong comment>
I was thinking about this the
I was thinking about this the other day – following a discussion with someone on a local LTN. What the local authorities and supra – local authorities like TfL should do is say, OK we are going to scrap all restrictions and end, once and for all, the “war on motorists’. We are going to remove all LTNs, filters, narrowings, yellow lines, zigzags. You can park anywhere, including on pavements if the roads are full. Double parking is also permitted. There will be no restrictions on entering the city centre – no ULEZ or congestion charge, so 20 year old diesel is fine and feel free to drive to the West End. Park outside the local school and shopping centres – feel free to double park if you need to pop into the shops. Traffic lights will be on constant amber. If you can manage to get above 10mph there are no speed restrictions. No bus lanes, no zebra crossings, no pelican crossings and certainly no cameras. It’s all yours car drivers. See how that works outs. Drive anywhere you want. Park anywhere you want.
You’ve a scoop on Reform’s
You’ve a scoop on Reform’s transport policy?
Think that’s already been
Think that’s already been done, at least on a small scale. Seem to remember some years ago the residents of somewhere said they didn’t need parking wardens because they could park responsibly on their own. So the council agreed to withdraw the wardens to see what would happen. Within 2 days the entire place had completely ground to a halt and the residents were petitioning to have the wardens back . . .
Would love to see the result of your more comprehensive experiment. Hopefully all the drivers would declare war on each other and solve the problem for us!
CyclingGardener wrote:
They already did! Every day drivers block other drivers, damage each other’s vehicles, indeed kill and injure each other (and stop the ambulances getting through).
… and the main losers are … everyone.
Everyone pays the costs for the casualties and the road damage. Road closures and indeed the remnants being pushed onto the footways can impede all. And partly “because safety” (motorists protecting themselves from their own mistakes or those of other motorists) we have bigger vehicles with a less clear view out (A-pillars). Which causes more problems – primarily for vulnerable road users.
I *do* think people have to feel the consequence of their choices for convenience. Unfortunately now “we have to drive” (people see no alternative) so increasing driver pain doesn’t quickly change behaviour. And because of their large, fast, protective exoskeleton, in a war *between* motorists the “collateral damage” is severe. And gives yet more reasons for not wanting to wait at a bus stop, never mind walk or cycle…
St Albans – Apr – Oct 2004
St Albans – Apr – Oct 2004
The police gave the council 18 months notice that they’d remove their traffic warden service and the local (LD) council didn’t get a replacement in place until October.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/3573948.stm
Rome73 wrote:
The ironic thing is that removing all of those measures would be fine for a cycling or walking area. It’s just the size/shape/speed of motor vehicles that makes all the other things necessary, and probably the fact that most motor vehicle collisions don’t end up hurting the driver.
“Cllr Henwood is the group
“Cllr Henwood is the group leader on Oxford City Council of the Independent Oxford Alliance. This party campaigns against Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and traffic filters.”
As anyone who has had anything to do with local government will know, the independents are the ones with no constructive policies, no strategies and no vision. They are generally full of bluster, wooly thinking, and don’t have any principles, but few of them indulge in actions that undermine their own arguments, like Cllr Henwood.
Demonstrating how to avoid the congestion charge whilst protesting against it is so wonderfully, poetically pointless, that I feel the good councillor deserves some sort of award; the rubber corkscrew? the square hoop?
The chocolate Fireguard of
The chocolate Fireguard of Honour?
eburtthebike wrote:
The Advisory Cycle Lane would seem apt…
I hope he’ll be covering the
I hope he’ll be covering the £1000 fine for ‘every car driver who beeps.’ *
https://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/motoring/using-your-car-horn-one-36032011
(* If only!)
Perhaps he could encourage
Perhaps he could encourage others to do the same and donate the money they save to his cause. That would really be sticking it to the man.
“bike users believe they know
“bike users believe they know better than the rest of us” and “live in blissful ignorance or regard for the needs of others”
The irony !
Once you get used to cycling in the rain you hardly notice it.