Today's fourth session of Parliamentary Inqury also addressed role of cycling in health...

Chris Boardman has said that “a true Olympic legacy” from London 2012 would be to get bicycle use in Britain back up from current levels of 2 per cent to the level of 15 per cent seen the previous time the capital was host city of the Olympic Games, back in 1948.

Boardman, former world and Olympic champion and in his former role as head of R&D at British Cycling one of the architects of Great Britain’s success last summer, was giving evidence at today’s session of the Get Britain Cycling Parliamentary Inquiry, which he described as a “watershed moment,” but cautioned, “we’ve got a finite amount of time to capitalise on the interest.”

He also warned that heightened interest in cycling and more people wanting to ride bikes “can only get us so far. We need to address the environment on the streets to see a real culture change; cycling should be an easy choice for people.”

Prior to addressing the inquiry, he had illustrated that very point by showing the short film he made for British Cycling, ‘Who Are Cycle Lanes For?’ which shows that even when planners seek to make provision for cyclists, too often the results are unsatisfactory and can create additional hazards for cyclists to negotiate.

A short journey from British Cycling on Vimeo.

Ashok Sinha, chief executive of the London Cycling Campaign, said: "We agree wholeheartedly with Chris Boardman’s call for an end to roads that are hostile to cycling, and for cycle provision to be a priority from the outset when designing and upgrading streets, with a view to making them safe and inviting for everyone to cycle.”

Giving a summary of today’s fourth session of the inquiry, Stafford MP Ian Austin, co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group (APPCG), which is hosting the inquiry, said: “It was the success of British Cycling’s athletes at London 2012 that prompted the Get Britain Cycling inquiry - to see how we can translate that success into becoming a true cycling nation.

“While the Games undeniably inspired more people to get on bikes, the fact is that we’re not going to get there without a concerted and co-ordinated effort strategy from central and local government.”

Much of the focus of today’s session focused on the health benefits of cycling, and while the National Institute for Health and Clinical Evidence (NICE), represented today, has issued guidance urging GPs to prescribe physical evidence such as cycling to those patients who could benefit from it, the inquiry learnt that the Department of Health does not currently have a designated cycling champion.

The economic benefits that a focus on cycling could bring to the NHS were however highlighted by health and transport expert, Dr Adrian Davis, who said: “For every £1 pound spent on cycling initiatives they can generally return up to £4 in saved costs to the NHS and value to the economy. The health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks by 20 to one.”

The inquiry was also told about initiatives designed to encourage cycling to school or work. Speaking about Bikeability training, Peter Salmon from The Mountbatten School in Hampshire, commented: “It is important that cycle training is inclusive so that people of all abilities can become safer road users.”

Meanwhile, Mark Brown of the Cycle to Work Alliance pointed out that despite the Cycle to Work scheme being a government initiative, not all departments had yet signed up to it. He also underlined facilities the role employers could play, saying: “Showers, changing rooms and places to lock up bikes at work would be an effective measure to get Britain cycling.”

Philip Insall, health director at the sustainable transport charity Sustrans, told the inquiry: “It is time the government recognised that getting more people cycling and walking represents real savings for the national purse.

“Physical inactivity is now responsible for as many deaths as smoking –Government and local authorities must do everything in their power to make it easy and safe for people to walk and cycle as part of their daily routines.

“Increasing walking and cycling levels will dramatically improve the health and wellbeing of the UK population and save the NHS billions – it’s an issue we simply cannot continue to ignore.”

He also urged Whitehall departments to co-operate more closely. “We need to see walking and cycling included into departmental objectives across government. There is existing guidance out there – if NICE guidance was implemented tomorrow we would have a cycle friendly environment.”

Dr Julian Huppert, MP for Cambridge and co-chair of the APPCG, commented:
“It was encouraging that we had a variety of government department representatives talking about the health benefits of cycling and how we can actively promote them.

“This is just the sort of joined up approach we need to encourage people to see cycling not only as a viable means of transport but also as a way to getting and staying fit. 

“With a third of our children and two thirds of adults overweight or obese we need to find a way to promote healthier lifestyles and cycling offers that opportunity. And if we encourage youngsters to learn how to cycle safely those skills should encourage them to continue through into their adult lives.”

The penultimate session of the Get Britain Cycling inquiry, which will address the changes that have to be made at a local level, will be held on 27 February.

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.


WolfieSmith [1389 posts] 4 years ago

Just had an email response from Liverpool Mayors' office about the new Boris Bike scheme to be launched in Liverpool this summer.

Of course the £2.5M for 1,000 Boris bikes and possibly some 'electric' bikes is ring fenced and cannot be spent on infrastructure.

Currently Liverpool has no viable cycle commuter route from north of the city. There are a few 'loop' routes but the council seem to think the 20% increase in cycling in the city should be met with more bikes for tourists rather than better planning for commuter routes.

Meanwhile in sunny Sefton last weekend we rode on a patch of cycle lane that has just been restored by the council. It was dug up by a utilities company and it has taken 4 years of avoidance and bullshit from the highways department and another year of arm twisting by my local councillor to get it put back.

It's a chicken and egg situation. Cycling is still not a serious option for 3% of people - let alone 14%. Until the quick, logical routes with secure hubs are in place the public's attitude won't change and the council can carry on pretending to 'deliver' by forcing us onto lengthy back roads or bits of cycle lane here and there rather than consult cyclists and make real changes.

I don't blame Chris but as he lives across the water I do hope he tries to help Liverpool over the next few years by visiting a few areas with local cyclists and try to persuade the council to make real changes -rather than just let them use his name and free cash for a bit of publicity smoke.

paulfg42 [392 posts] 4 years ago

Good and effective little video from Boardman. He is very articulate and clear about what is needed.

But how do we counter the pro-car mentality, especially when the tories are in power?

Max_headset [19 posts] 4 years ago

The evidence about the continued marginalisation of cycling is visible for all to see here. Despite a solid dominance of the Olympics and national tv sporting awards Cycling has yet to be elevated to a permanent place in the menu bar of the BBC Sports page

If the public are to realise cycling is as huge as it is and its certainly larger then Tennis as a sport or activity and the BBC have no shortage of weekly pro level national and international events to report on.


If the sport fails to register on the media richter scale then what chance are the campaigners of the mundane commute going to have to do to get recognition that tells the public this is happening take note and your wallet and heart cant afford for you to be the last on the program.

bikecellar [268 posts] 4 years ago

They are also rejigging text services with cycling still as "other sport"

hairyairey [304 posts] 4 years ago

For cycling to get the prominence it deserves the BBC inter alia would have to admit that this country is rubbish at Athletics (on a cost-benefit analysis). Now that's never going to happen...

Sedgepeat [93 posts] 4 years ago

Except in 1948 very few people had a car. It's now 2013. Why do the cycle lobby think progress is going backwards?
Back in 1948 there were horse drawn milk floats too & coal carts & rag & bone carts. Now horses are toatally obsolete apart from pure recreation.

Is this parliamentary committee hearing any reality by any chance?

matthewn5 [1100 posts] 4 years ago

Sedgepeat wrote:

"Except in 1948 very few people had a car. It's now 2013. Why do the cycle lobby think progress is going backwards?"

People said this about trains, until recently. Now we have seen the highest ever annual mileage on a network that's only got 50% as many tracks.

Point being? I think there's a huge latent demand for alternatives to driving a motor car and being stuck in endless traffic. If we put as much effort into improving cycle tracks as we have in the last 15 years into improving railways, we will see the same growth.

oadatapa [10 posts] 4 years ago

For answers join the four day cycle infrastructure study tour of Oldenburg and Bremen: http://www.camcycle.org.uk/jumpto/OldenburgTour