David Gaudu (Groupama-FDJ) took his third professional victory on the Alto de la Farrapona on Stage 11 of the Vuelta a Espana, having spent the day in the break. The day was also notable for Chris Froome leading a rider protest over time bonuses before the stage start.
Gaudu was one of two riders in with a chance of victory on the first of two summit finishes this weekend, and edged out fellow breakaway rider Marc Soler (Movistar) in the final few hundred metres.
Soler could at least comfort himself with having moved up four places to sixth overall.
There were no other significant changes in the top ten, although young British rider Hugh Carthy (EF Pro Cycling) – who is fourth overall – was gapped at the finish and lost seven seconds to those ahead of him.
Primoz Roglic (Jumbo-Visma) retains the race lead.
Earlier in the day, Chris Froome (Ineos Grenadiers) had led a rider protest over changes to the rules on time gaps at the end of the previous day’s stage.
Stage 10 winner Roglic had gone into the race lead on the same time as Richard Carapaz (Ineos Grenadiers) that day following a split in the bunch.
Race judges had used a one-second rule to identify the time gaps. However, Eurosport reports that riders had been told at the start of the stage that a three-second gap would be needed to qualify as a split – a rule that is applied on stages where a sprint finish is expected.
Because times are taken from the first rider in each group, a one-second split from the back of one group to the front of the next can in some cases mean riders in the following group losing 10 seconds or more.
"It was a mistake on the UCI’s part and the commissaires part," said EF Pro Cycling’s Michael Woods. "They initially said at the start of the stage it was going to be a three-second gap instead of a one-second gap.
“Looking at the finish it should have been a one-second gap, but that’s what they said at the start. But at the finish they changed their mind.”
Woods said that several riders would have approached the finish differently had they known how the rules be applied. He also said that Jumbo-Visma were “on board” with the protest even though they had benefited.
Froome took it upon himself to lead the protest and spoke to race organisers about the riders’ concerns.
It has since been reported that EF Pro Cycling have lodged EF an official complaint.
That one was completely different though, it was a driver not a car as in the other 3. So 1 in 4 of the stories manage to follow reporting guidelines.
Absolutely they could have. Tarmac is a petroleum-based product and its surface can be very oily when it's newly laid. This is particularly the...
I'm glad the article went into more detail and cleared things up, the headline had me worried that some autonomous building had run rampant and...
Still here, just showing a few signs of wear and tear. Hopefully still serviceable for some years to come.
Has he fully recovered though, and will he ever?...
How can you know that you are "equally fearful" as "any female cyclist"? There is no possible way of quantifying such emotions and female cyclists...
I think it would be fairer to blame the moon - as in "my client is a loony".
Nice idea but Gloucestershire Constabulary are not interested as exemplified by this prvious NMOTD. Not only was there NFA for the close pass in...
Peace Was Never An Option
I think black boxes are great for early detection of cognitive decline and/or sight problems. Someone's driving is going to become much less smooth...