Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Rugby Borough Council ditches plan to introduce Public Spaces Protection Order to ban town centre cyclists

Proposed "sledgehammer to crack a nut" legislation was rejected by two thirds of respondents to consultation...

Rugby Borough Council has ditched a plan to introduce a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) banning cyclists from the centre of the Warwickshire town after two thirds of respondents to a consultation rejected the proposals, with one likening it to using a “sledgehammer to crack a nut.”

Cycling is already banned from 11am to 4pm under a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) enforceable by Warwickshire Police officers. The proposed PSPO would have enabled council wardens to issue fines against people contravening it.

The council received 42 responses to the consultation, which canvassed views on whether a PSPO should be introduced to tackle the perceived problem of antisocial cycling.

While 13 respondents were in favour of introducing a PSPO, 29 opposed it, many of them highlighting that it was unfair to subject all cyclists to such an order based on the antisocial behaviour of a minority.

Another issue commonly raised by opponents of the PSPO was that in some streets where cycling is banned from 11am-4pm under the existing TRO, motor vehicles such as delivery vans are still allowed to circulate.

The point was also made that with town centre businesses already losing trade to out-of-town operators, the council should be encouraging people to use the shops and services in the centre, rather than deterring them.

Supporting the proposals, the local police safer neighbourhoods team and the town’s business improvement district both said they had received complaints of anti-social cycling, and one councillor said that they had “nearly been hit on a couple of occasions.”

But a report prepared for the council’s cabinet ahead of its meeting on Monday (see page 177 of the agenda) revealed that it had received just one complaint on the subject in the past six months.

The report noted that “If the Council were to introduce a PSPO, then it is likely to be assumed that the Council has have taken on responsibility for enforcement against antisocial cycling.

“Under these circumstances, there is the potential for the Council to be considered liable for any relative activities which could include damage and injury claims.”

It concluded that “The consultation results show a lack of supportive evidence to implement this PSPO and a lack of evidence to demonstrate the issue being of a persistent or continuing nature.

“There is however, significant anecdotal evidence to show there is a problem which is not being adequately dealt with currently.”

The council accordingly resolved to scrap the plan.

PSPOs can be used by local authorities to ban a wide range of behaviour within a delineated zone, including urinating or defecating in public, begging, or even charity ‘chugging’.

However, as we have previously reported on road.cc, towns including Bedford, Mansfield and Peterborough have used them to also ban cycling, something that the charity Cycling UK has said is an abuse of the legislation and seeks to criminalise normal behaviour.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

4 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
1 like

It's ridiculous when they try to ban ordinarily legal behaviour because they can't be arsed to police the area to stop the "problem" cyclists. It'd be like banning all cars from a road because some of them break the speed limit.

Avatar
leqin replied to hawkinspeter | 5 years ago
1 like

hawkinspeter wrote:

banning all cars from all roads.

Fixed it for you and if you form a party and present this as one of your objectives then you would get my vote in the election hawkinspeter

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to leqin | 5 years ago
0 likes

leqin wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

banning all cars from all roads.

Fixed it for you and if you form a party and present this as one of your objectives then you would get my vote in the election hawkinspeter

That'd be great, but I think there'd be a lot of opposition to it. Maybe aiming for less cars is more feasible.

Avatar
StuInNorway | 5 years ago
2 likes

I've been "nearly hit" multiple times when attempting to cross on marked crossing points (both in the UK and here in Norway) but that doesn't mean I expect them to ban cars, I expect the police to deal with those who ignore the rules of the road, whatever type of transport they use. 

Latest Comments