Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Add new comment
17 comments
Love the look of the new Garmin watches - but at £1400 for the cheapest model I'll just have to dream!
The Bristol incident really does exemplify the sense of entitlement of the worthless pile of shit that is the British driver, doesn't it? Not only does he act like a twat, and not only does he endanger another person's life for no reason, but he is so sure, so absolutely certain that there will never be any consequences to himself, that he feels entitled to stop and lecture the cyclist.
If that had been me, I'd have got off the bike and walked calmly past him to place myself in front of him. Had he made the mistake of putting a hand on me, then there would have been some consequences.
As for the 'inches from death', well what can I say? No driver, no matter how fast he drives, can outrun a bullet.
Allegedly.
With his arm out of the window like that, had he touched me I rather fear that the consequential fall onto his arm would not have done his elbow any favours at all.
A Kryptonite D-lock to the bridge of his nose would have been detrimental to his wellbeing, too.
Not that I would ever suggest such a course of action.
Besides.. everyone knows that a paving stone is the way to go, natch.
[snip]
With all due respect to the Cardiff cycling infra, going by that mock up the lanes are 4 foot wide, why do they think that's acceptable? The road is still wide AND straight, why not make the cycle lanes wide and straight and put the dog leg in on the road for the motors and make them narrow to slow them down?
Also, the Paradox has gone to disc only, so despite the photo of a rim brake bike on the website including the scrolling photos, you can't have one. What's annoying is that making out 32mm width for a disc brake road bike as being an improvement is a bit weak, ti rim brake bikes like the Sabbath September and many more could already do that with caliper brakes, the original Paradox accepted 30mm tyres under a short drop caliper as it was, is that 2mm extra tyre clearance on a road bike going to make a difference, why not make it 35mm considering the only frame option is disc?
And whilst we're at it, restricting your 'gravel' bike to 40mm also seems a bit shortsighted, oh right, you can have 50mm IF you stump for another set of wheels, given there are plenty of wide 700C/29er type tyres to choose from why oh why leave it so that the only way you can go decently wide is to be forced to buy 650b and the narrow range of tyres on offer!!
So, up the weight of the frame/forks for a 2mm tyre width increase .. and all for the princely sum of £2k!
Read the original review, Mike Stead said (in 2017) of the rim braked variant "Out in the North Hampshire Downs I equalled a five-year-standing personal best time on my go-to twisty singletrack road descent – 59 seconds at 54kph, besting times I've set on £5k disc-braked drop-bar carbon rocketsleds"
Seems to me that improving the road variant to disc brakes only is about narrowing down what the seller has to build, so why the 80 day wait for a build when you won't build what some people want??
Jesus wept - not again. There is a large range of 650b tyres (and wheels) available. One of reasons for going to 650b is exactly that - there is also the matter of helping to reduce height and geometry variations as the tyre sizes increase. You could also put space in for more than 40mm on a 700c/29er but that would also typically raise the bottom of the head tube due to the higher fork crown, perhaps that is not something that they want in the design. That said, 40mm is not too bad and given how pesimistic almost every manufacturer is about tyre clearance (as you yourself have mentioned on a number of occasions) you'd expect to fit a chunk wider than that. If you don't want to have extra wheelsets for different situations, which is understandable although arguably desireable, then see what will fit, use what does or don't buy this.
There is less range of 650b than there is of 700C/622, by multiple factors.
This is from Wiggle, one of the biggest retailers in the country, note the number of 650b tyres compared to 700C and 29ers tyres.
Forcing riders to have to have 650b wheels so that they can get the width they want when plenty of sporty robust disc frames and plenty of rim braked frames in the past could already do that with 700C/622 is just bullshit and more marketing crap.
Why not design the frame properly and use a fork that will accept a 50mm tyre with the 622 sizing for which there is a massive choice of tyres and negates the need to have two wheel sizes for the one bike! Specialized amongst others managed to do that with their rim braked 'gravel' bikes in the mid to late 00s without any problem whatsoever (carbon forks/seat stays+alu chainstays that accepted 55mm tyres) so why can't a good frame builder who offers 80 days for your build time do it with Ti and carbon forks??
Capture.JPG
Yeah - so firstly they can't even categorise their tyres probably and you've missed out some of the options; actually search for 650b /27.5" tyres and you get significantly more - 59 for 650b and 194 for 27.5", duplicates not culled - and this is from a more road oriented shop. Secondly, yes there is more choice of 700/29" tyres, i've never pretended there wasn't, it was simply in reply to you saying that the range is narrow. It's not, even from Wiggle. Seriously, go and actually look what's available in the market.
No-one is forcing anyone to do anything - that bike is another choice and a decent one at that for what it was marketed for - gravel. In that area the 700c tyre widths should be more than adequate, have a look at the tyre sizes used in e.g. the Dirty Kanza - most folk are in the 35-42mm range for 700c which should be fine here given how gnarly that is. If you want to go further off-piste and want to use larger tyres having chosen this bike, then you could by getting another wheelset - or you could choose another bike which allows more options, which I agree would be nice to have more range of. There are potential advantages to that wheelset if you wanted to buy it, especially at the lower pressures you'd presumably be running, but it would cost you - it's a choice. Having that extra choice is a nice-to-have, if you're serious about going on and off-road in differing enough conditions that you need radically differing tyre sizes, you're probably not going to using 700c wheels for all those situations - if you're not that serious then what is so seriously limiting in real, honest, practical terms with this ? It's all choice.
Step away. BTBS is an opinionated keyboard warrior who goes on about being forced into things, but if he stepped back he'd realise that what he's constantly arguing would force others to the narrow constraints defined by his own exacting standards/prejudices/opinions/mind-set.
And I'll now leave him to bite, only as I'm not likely to look back at this page again, I'll probably never see the resulting rant ... shame!
I have just checked out Farnborough Cyclist's YouTube channel, a lot of terrifying driving. The area in and around Farnborough can be very nasty.
That close pass looks like the A324 road to Pirbright? I’ve riden it regularly and haven’t had too many issues. As it’s quiet when I use it there’s plenty of room (as in this case!!) but speeding is always evident. That seemed deliberate to me? Hopefully Hants Police can take action??
Hampshire Constabulary take action! Don't make me laugh. they are probably preparing a public order offence charge for the cyclist because he swore.
On the Bristol episode - that junction there - splitting off to either go up Park Street or along toward At Bristol (sorry - "We the Curious" ) - is terrible whether you're on a bike or in a car. People seem to lose all ability to look ahead and decide where they need to be, to go where they want to go.
(Also - to me, looked like the taxi just undertook/cut-off the cyclist).
I ride through the centre daily and see all sorts usually cars trying to beat the lights from the bus turning to Baldwin Street junction which is only possible if they do an F1 style launch and speed. I can't beat the lights on my bike so don't really bother accelerating but still you get cars passing me which I then pass and filter to the front.
I don't go through there that often, but I go for the tactic of trying to put myself well in front of the buses/taxis/cars. However, that does entail going "slightly early" at the lights. If all goes well, I get to the next queue of traffic before anyone's caught up with me (more of a sign of how congested it is rather than me being quick).
Another reason IMHO for my son to go to Cardiff Uni