Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
7 comments
What was the reasoning behind the soc-called cycle lane? Did they have a tin of paint left over out of the painted lines budget?
they often get put in when the council road planners are treating cyclists as best way to describe it is "pedestrians with a bike".
and their reasoning is they believe its safer for cyclists if you want to turn right on a bicycle at that kind of junction rather than waiting in the middle of the road and no doubt holding up the important motor traffic whilst waiting for a suitable gap for you to turn left first on that little loop, which swings you round facing the way you want to go,and handily gets you out of the way of the vehicles, then you just cross over the road you were on, as if you were a pedestrian...just with a bike...and then you join up with no doubt some shared cycle path theyve put in on the right hand side we cant see in that picture, which may go some distance or may stop within a few metres.
they are quite common with councils who dont really understand cycling infrastructure or cyclists needs, and yes they laughably do always claim its infrastructure that promotes cycling
It's another 3 metres to add to their total bike lanes created, six if you count using it in both directions, every little (apparently) helps...
That cycle lane (?) reminded me that I hadn't looked at Warrington Cycle Campaign's Cycling Facility of the Month site for a year or so. Nothing has changed, and I'm eternally surprised at the incompetence of our planners. It's a pretty close race between them and this government.
http://wcc.crankfoot.xyz/facility-of-the-month/
"Handlebars" by Flobots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLUX0y4EptA
"C'mon Let Me Ride" by Skylar X featuring Eminem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhxPBrxxaqc
"My Bike" by Y.N.RichKids: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rSH5K5LlE8
"Biking" by Frank Ocean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYGPcfUqzL0
I thought the current plan was to not worry about air pollution. It's only the poor people that will be affected as the more well-to-do people can live somewhere nice and green. The only problem is that dastardly NHS that will spend more money trying to prolong the proles' lives - a quick bout of privitisation will fix that. Right comrades?
I heard about the government's plan to tackle air pollution (if such a spectacular failure to address the problem can be dignified with the word "plan") on the news today, and all they talked about was wood-burning stoves, as if motor vehicles just don't exist. Yet another catastrophuck to join all the others this ultra-shambles has inflicted on us.
I know we shouldn't really get political on a cycling website, but this shower of utter incompetents has to go. And I'm being polite.