At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I characterise the USA is a Third World country with more money, and in many places there are very limited laws protecting the public from being...
Surely the answer to this one is that it is not a place to overtake, both because of the major hazard hatching ("do not enter unless ESSENTIAL"),...
I don't think the HQ was the major part of RBS going under, there!...
Thanks for a nice round-up.
And then you woke up.
Fair assesment, i guess, and I probably look at it too much from my Dutch (flat country) persective....
...
I've been running a set of Light Bicycle WR40 wheels for a year now, no complaints from me so far. ...
Just think if Mark has never gone to that cycling meet..
On the Greens - I hope the Green party sticks to principles of social justice, localism and environmentalism. I'm not familiar with European...