- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
6 comments
Not more plastic tech land fill? Zzzzzz. Just ride.
Garmin have too many blasted devices, and it's a strategy that's going to bite them in the backside before too long.
I've just taken a look at this on their US product page (not listed yet in the UK) and they have ten different forerunner watches. I honestly can't be bothered to work out what the differences are, it's too much effort.
But that's not even all their watches. They have yet more ranges for swimming, golf, hiking etc.
I expect this is the first market that smart watches will steal over the next few years. The hardware isn't that different between all these devices, you're paying for different software features. I'd rather have a standardised platform and be able to buy the features (apps) as I need them.
Totally agree, but the Forerunner 15 is actually a new model that does something pretty unique, unusually for Garmin! You get a fitness band style accelerometer built in, so it can track movement even when the GPS is off, a pretty nifty feature. You are basically getting a built in Garmin Vivofit/Nike Fuel band included in the price, which makes this arguably the pick of the cheap multi sport watches at the moment.
The only other GPS watch that can do this right now is the Polar V800, and its way more expsensive.
That's good for this individual device, and I'm slightly interested. I was just having a bit of a rant about the overall strategy. For the average consumer the range is completely baffling. Hell, it's getting that way for the enthusiast.
Now the cycling kit is going the same way. We've got four different base models (200, 500, 800, 1000) plus variations within those models (510, 810), plus at least one more specifically for touring.
I think they could crunch that range right down to two. A basic model similar to the 500 today which is an advanced cycle computer with GPS and sensor support. Then a high end model which does all the navigation features and other things on the 800/1000.
If they stay as they are, someone will make a cheap as chips cycle computer based on a ruggedised bit of last generation android hardware. We'll see it pop up at Decathlon or even Aldi one day, and it will eat Garmin's lunch.
Is there a reason why something strapped to your wrist can't do the same heart rate monitoring job of something strapped around your chest?
yes and no. a chest strap listens for the electrical activity of your heart, so that wouldn't work, but there are various solutions for looking out for a pulse that can be implemented on the wrist.