Tour of Flanders winner Tadej Pogačar could receive a driving ban and fine over the incident which saw the peloton split during the early stages of Sunday’s Monument, the prosecutor’s office investigating the “bad example” set by riders who failed to stop at a railway crossing’s red light.
The incident occurred at a railway crossing in Wichelen, the rear sections of the peloton stopped as the barriers came down to let a train pass through. Pogačar, his UAE Team Emirates teammates and many other riders positioned near the front of the bunch had already passed through and were held up by race commissaires to allow the rest of the peloton to regain contact.
Chaos in Flanders as a train splits the bunch in two 😮
The break carry on unhindered and make more work for UAE Team Emirates 😩 pic.twitter.com/AG8gQtmIEi
— Cycling on TNT Sports (@cyclingontnt) April 5, 2026
Reports from Belgium suggest the East Flanders public prosecutor’s office intends to take action against riders who, in the words of a spokesperson for rail operator Infrabel, set a “bad example”. An estimate also suggests that between 20 and 30 riders may face action, and could receive fines ranging from €320 to €4,000 and an eight-day driving ban.
A spokesperson for train network operator Infrabel also condemned the scenes.
“Traffic regulations are clear: if the lights at a level crossing are on red, you must stop. That’s the case in everyday life, and it naturally applies in a cycling race too,” Frédéric Petit told Flanders-based news channel VRT.
“The police or traffic control contact us so that we can stop the train for a few minutes. That did not happen at this level crossing. Then you end up with a situation like this, when the first part of the peloton passes the closed barrier and a second part has to wait. That is, of course, not a good example. In everyday life, these offences carry severe penalties.”
The incident went unmentioned in the UCI commissaires’ post-race report and no riders were disqualified, possibly due to the large number who had made the front group. Pogačar was fined 500 Swiss francs and docked 25 UCI points afterwards, however that was for “disposing of waste outside of disposal areas”.
At the time, the railway crossing incident caused some controversy as the breakaway was not stopped, meaning its advantage went up by around 90 seconds, forcing UAE Team Emirates to exert more energy chasing.
“It was not nice,” Pogačar said afterwards. “I think they could prevent this by stopping us before, no? Not 10 meters before the crossing, three guys jump on the road. I was thinking, maybe it’s like some protesters or something, like, something crazy is going on. And yeah, then the bunch was split from the crossing.”
Every so often a pro race will be stopped by a passing train at a railway crossing, it’s a bizarre scene but one that simply comes as standard for a sport held on hundreds of kilometres of public road.
The most famous incident involving a train crossing came at Paris-Roubaix back in 2015, with riders sprinting across the tracks and blatantly ignoring calls to stop. In response, the UCI amended its rules and made it “strictly forbidden to cross level crossings when the barrier is down or closing, the warning signal ringing or flashing”.
US rider Taylor Phinney was disqualified from the 2017 Tour of Britain for crossing a railway when the barriers were coming down.
These days, a red light at a level crossing is rarely cause for much stress, most riders now familiar and trusting of the established response whereby commissaires will slow down any groups or riders ahead of the split and ensure the gaps are maintained when racing resumes. It is unclear why the commissaires allowed Sunday’s breakaway to continue to grow its advantage while the peloton behind was halted at the barriers or slowed by race staff.

21 thoughts on “Tadej Pogačar could face driving ban for running red light at railway crossing during Tour of Flanders, as train operator criticises riders setting “bad example””
Responsibility should rest with the race organisers, who should 1. know the train timetable and 2. stop the race at the crossing.
How would that help? The timetable won’t tell you the exact time each train will be at the level crossing.
I think the point is that if you’re running a major event on the public roads and you know that your event goes over a level crossing (and roughly when) then it’s reasonable to expect that you’ve made some effort to determine whether your event might coincide with a train going over that crossing, and if the train company doesn’t want to disrupt their service then you’ve made sure the event participants know the rules beforehand and you’ve positioned someone at the crossing who can communicate clearly and in good time to the participants that they’re going to have to stop?
‘Knowing the timetable’ won’t get you any of that, though.
What might is communicating directly with the relevant authorities. Which is apparently what they already usually do.
Depends on how busy the line is I guess. There’s a level crossing near my mother’s house that has two branch lines running through it from local stations; knowing the departure and arrival times from said local stations I know what times in the hour the gates will be down and whether I can cross there or should ride round to a bridge under the line.
It’ll give you a rough idea, but it won’t tell you whether or not the trains are going to be on time, or how late they might be. And in any case, you’ve got to factor in that they don’t know exactly when the /race/ will reach it – there could be a significant time window, depending on what pace they’re setting. The only way to really manage it reliably is to have real-time information.
Never mind AT the crossing, should have stopped it before the crossing to avoid precisely this confusion.
Maybe the race organisers and railway companies could arrange for trains to be rescheduled or halted at certain times, so that the crossing was always open for cyclists?
And maybe it could be arranged for the gates to be always closed if Trump or JD Vance were travelling by road on an official visit?
The cycling side of things would probably work better in the UK where the relevant networks could be planned out for a weekend of engineering work.
Perhaps a Monument could be arranged to coincide with Trump’s visit. Trump could then be given a motorcycle to race the exhausted winner over 1km, be PROCLAIMED AS THE CHAMPION and then presented with a HUGE TROPHY.
Bigly!
It sounds like that is what often happens; it just didn’t happen in this case for whatever reason.
From the VRT article linked above:
“Before and during the race, there is close consultation with the police and traffic control HQ, says [Infrabel spokesperson Frédéric Petit]. If the police judge that safety is at risk, Infrabel can temporarily halt train services.
‘The police or traffic control contact us so that we can stop the train for a few minutes. That did not happen at this level crossing.’”
No excuses. All riders who crossed the railwail when the light was red should be DSQ’d, fined and prosecuted, if applicable. As professional cyclists, they are role models, they are expected to behave accordingly. Actions have consequences.
Railwail? Was it a ghost train?
You really do go out of your way to talk bollocks, don’t you? Firstly, professional cyclists are not “role models” for good road behaviour when they are racing. Otherwise they would all ride at the posted speed limit, stick to the appropriate side of the road, slow/stop at every give way and stop sign and obey all traffic lights. Secondly, from Pogacar’s description, it seems the lights turned red when the front group was too close to stop without causing a pileup; if they were ten metres away as he states, the reaction plus stopping time for a cyclist going in excess of 40 km/h, as they would have been, is in excess of 20 metres, so they wouldn’t have been able to stop if they tried. Let’s wait and see what the investigation reveals instead of getting all moist at the prospect of mass DQs, fines and prosecutions, shall we?
I think the ‘ten metres’ was more in reference to when the commissaires started trying to flag them down. Looking at the clip above, they appear to have only just passed when the barriers start coming down – the lights usually start showing a fair while before that, so would likely have been visible from further away than that (though if they’re focused on the race and no-one’s given them a heads up that a level crossing’s approaching they might not notice them right away).
Ramps on either side and a jump, that’s the answer. Much more entertaining.
And isn’t mashing up different disciplines (not to say their practitioners) the thing these days?
Ideally with a boxcar with no sides on the train, so they can jump through it.
I’m not sure if it still pertains but when I lived in Belgium for a few years as a child the gap between red lights and gates descending used to be much shorter than in the UK, to the extent that we were specifically warned at my international, English-speaking school to be aware and never to take a gamble with them. It’s a shame there doesn’t seem to be any footage from the head of the race moto that could show how long after the red lights it was that the leaders went through.
Well obviously – in the UK we have the superior concept of red lights needing time to become established before they’re meaningful.
Closures here seem to start a helluva long time ahead of a train passing. It’s elfin safety gone mad. In the US (and I’m not suggesting they’ve got it exactly right), if you don’t heed the warnings from the outset, you going to Chattanooga boy.
Dumbest shit I’ve ever heard. It’s a freaking race. Do what you gotta do!