hawkinspeter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 3,246 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Berlin Car Ban #985047
    0
    hawkinspeter

    I get your point, but there’s

    I get your point, but there’s a vast difference in scale between 10-20 Trabis and however many thousands of workers that could be using the S-Bahn.

    in reply to: Berlin Car Ban #985043
    0
    hawkinspeter

    I only saw them driving

    I only saw them driving around and thought that they were having some Trabi rally or something until I saw all the Trabi Safari adverts.

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/trabi.jpeg

    in reply to: Berlin Car Ban #985039
    0
    hawkinspeter

    Good – it’s kinda cute to see

    Good – it’s kinda cute to see a whole line of Trabis bimbling around the various sights.

    in reply to: Berlin Car Ban #985035
    0
    hawkinspeter

    Great stuff – I hope it goes

    Great stuff – I hope it goes through. Berlin has decent public transport (subways) and lots of cycle lanes, but what will happen to the tourist tours they do using East German Trabis?

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/trabi-safari.jpeg

    in reply to: Schwalbe Pro One tubeless availability #984591
    0
    hawkinspeter

    Well, that another data point

    Well, that another data point on my theory of slippery Pro Ones – don’t go much over 70PSI with them.

    in reply to: Petrol Gate #985003
    0
    hawkinspeter
    Velophaart_95 wrote:
    I quite agree; far too many people want their cake, and eat it. So the cushy job in the town/city, the nice house in a rural/semi rural area, then send their kids to the best school. And all need travelling by motor vehicle. It has to end……but won’t.

    The reliance on the car is a damining indictment of modern life.

    One aspect of the long work commute is that people inevitably feel emotionally distanced from where they work, so they don’t care about the dirt and pollution in the city (that’s work – it’s horrible) and only care about their home in the countryside. There’s also the windscreen effect – drivers are literally insulated from the places that they drive through which leads them to not being interested in them other than a place they try to drive through as quickly as possible. This also manifests as NIMBY – they don’t want to see their idyll being changed to help wider society. If we want to get a stronger sense of community, then we need to reduce the distances that people travel to get to work.

    in reply to: Is road.cc hungover on Belgian beer or something? #984799
    0
    hawkinspeter

    I just heard that you fired

    I just heard that Road.cc fired the tech responsible for the site issues, but luckily he walked straight into a top job at Facebook

     

    https://cdn.road.cc/wp-content/uploads/roadcc/SiteIsDown.png

    in reply to: King Alfreds Way #985013
    0
    hawkinspeter

    Sorry – I wasn’t doubting

    Sorry – I wasn’t doubting that 35mm is appropriate, but pointing out (poorly) that you’d written 35m

    in reply to: King Alfreds Way #985009
    0
    hawkinspeter

    Nice write up.

    Nice write up.

    A minimum tyre width of 35m seems more than excessive though

    in reply to: Petrol Gate #984881
    0
    hawkinspeter

    Petrol-gate certainly seems

    Petrol-gate certainly seems to be highlighting some people’s selfishness. The slight shortage could easily have been managed if it weren’t for panic buying of petrol and of course some people are driving around lots in an attempt to buy petrol.

    I wonder if this is going to push more people into getting electric vehicles though that just moves the bottleneck onto electric charge points instead.

    in reply to: Is road.cc hungover on Belgian beer or something? #984797
    0
    hawkinspeter
    markieteeee wrote:
    HP – it wasn’t a dig at you, it was more that I was thinking that people are maybe tired of this being dragged up again and again. I happened to see your comment, which neatly evidenced this point, just as I saw his reply. So it was no way saying that you defend his views or have a low boredom threshold, it was this. 

    No worries – I didn’t consider it to be a dig at me at all (and I do have a low boredom threshold unless it involves squirrels). I’ll quite happily defend some of his views (and not so much others) – he often brings an interesting point of view to discussions.

    in reply to: Is road.cc hungover on Belgian beer or something? #984789
    0
    hawkinspeter
    markieteeee wrote:
    Nice try at re-opening the debate that even your defender can’t be bothered to read.

    If you’re referring to me as Rich_cb’s defender, then I was acting more as a character witness (assuming that’s even possible across t’interwebs). Don’t go bringing my boredom threshold into this – I didn’t even read all of your reply. Personally, I doubt very much that anyone on this site gets involved at all with people trafficking.

    in reply to: Is road.cc hungover on Belgian beer or something? #984773
    0
    hawkinspeter
    markieteeee wrote:
    To be fair to Rich, he never claimed he was a fan of the Australian government’s policy of paying people traffickers to try to reduce the numbers of asylum seekers. He said he was a fan of it as he incorrectly claimed it prevented drownings. So even when you provide the multiple links where he has heralded the Australian model, he will still  be able to plausibly deny the exact wording of your sentence. 

    That thread/discussion just carried on and on for long enough that no-one could physically read all of it – Rich_cb could have said anything at all on there. More seriously though, he strikes me as being compassionate (as well as argumentative at times) so it doesn’t ring true that he knowingly supports anything that leads to increasing deaths.

    in reply to: Swindon Wheelers BBC Complaint #984877
    0
    hawkinspeter

    I’ve got the same response

    I’ve got the same response from my complaint. It was really disingenuous of them to edit that video and I don’t see that taking out 10-15 seconds is really about the video length.

    in reply to: Dissertation Help- Chance to win £25 Halfords Voucher #984873
    0
    hawkinspeter
    mdavidford wrote:
    Do you accept Northern Irish notes?

    I’d have to examine them, hold them up to the light and suck air through my teeth before deciding. They’re not strictly legal tender in England and Wales, so it might be harder to spend them.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,441 through 1,455 (of 3,246 total)