Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Cane Creek eeSilk+ Seat Post Aluminium



Smooth and subtle solution to taming bumps in the roads or trails, now at a competitive price
No bob when pedalling
Great on the road or gravel
Easy setup
Very well made
It's cheaper, but still not cheap
388g Recommends

This product has been selected to feature in recommends. That means it's not just scored well, but we think it stands out as special. Go to recommends

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Cane Creek eeSilk+ Aluminium Seat Post takes the excellent build quality and performance of the standard eeSilk, and gives you an extra 15mm of travel. If you want a subtle bump-taming solution whatever the terrain, this needs to be on your shortlist – especially considering the price drop.

Back at the end of last year Cane Creek announced an upgraded eeSilk range, and as Dave liked the original version so much, I was hoping the new models were going to perform as well.

The biggest change, though, is to the price. The original aluminium eeSilk was £319, while the new one is £224.99.

This eeSilk+ offers an increased travel of 35mm, versus the standard (nonplussed?) version with 20mm. Like the shorter version it retails for £224.99, while the carbon fibre version is £329.

This new price makes the eeSilk+ much more competitive against other suspension seastposts, such as the Redshift ShockStop (which also has 35mm of travel), which is currently £214.99. That's quite heavy though, despite being 27.2mm only: the 350mm version I tested weighed 545g, whereas this eeSilk+ is just 338g in a 31.6mm diameter.

The Cirrus Cycles Kinekt 2.1 doesn't look to be available direct in the UK at the moment, but is available on Amazon for around £245-£270, depending on size.

So, the eeSilk+ is well priced against the competitors and it's lighter too – that Kinect was 614g!

Shoulda put a spring on it

The performance is also great, in my opinion. I don't want to be able to feel that I've got a suspension seatpost on my bike. This might sound a little strange, but I like quite a firm ride and I especially do not want to be feeling the saddle bob around underneath me while I'm pedalling. The eeSilk+ achieves this.

2022 Cane Creek eeSilk+ Seat Post Aluminium - 4.jpg

It is so subtle in its action it is barely noticeable, and it just gently absorbs the little ripples and bumps without telegraphing its presence. It's only on the big bumps that you feel it use the available travel. It's also very smooth.

Most importantly for me, it doesn't react to pedalling efforts at all, even when turning them over hard. On the road it just feels to me like a standard seatpost; yes, it moves slightly in reaction to the roughness of the road, but it's pretty much undetectable.

The spring rate of the seatpost is controlled its elastomer, and that can be swapped for a softer or harder version than the default one to tune it for your weight. I found the standard one spot on, and after my usual three-hour gravel route I found I was noticeably more comfortable, and less fatigued too – I hadn't had to spend as much time out of the saddle when flying along the rough sections.

> 31 of the best cycling saddles for 2021 – get more comfortable on your road bike

The pivot design uses stainless steel axles (previous eeSilks used hollow aluminium) and IGUS bushes. As I've said, the whole operation runs very smoothly (even after plenty of wet weather abuse), and it's quiet too. There is a tiny bit of lateral play if you wiggle the cradle from the top, but it's not noticeable when riding at all.

2022 Cane Creek eeSilk+ Seat Post Aluminium - 1.jpg

This post is very well engineered and, as Dave mentioned in his review of the earlier eeSilk, he's been running the mountain bike equivalent (the Cane Creek Thudbuster) for the best part of twenty years with no issues. That bodes very well for reliability.

The aluminium eeSilk+ comes in 27.2 and 31.6mm diameters, and has an overall length of 387mm, with the bottom of the mechanism to the bottom of the saddle's rail measuring around 70mm. The rider weight limit is 113kg.

2022 Cane Creek eeSilk+ Seat Post Aluminium - 2.jpg

Saddle fitment is easy with a socket cap hex bolt at the rear and a regular bolt for adjustment at the front. I takes a spanner for adjustment, something I prefer to a thumbwheel design. The post is also Di2 battery compatible.

2022 Cane Creek eeSilk+ Seat Post Aluminium - 3.jpg


Dave was very impressed with the original eeSilk, and this eeSilk+ is just as brilliant to use – and better still, it comes at a much lower price too.


Smooth and subtle solution to taming bumps in the roads or trails, now at a competitive price test report

Make and model: Cane Creek eeSilk+ Seat Post Aluminium

Size tested: 31.6mm

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Cane Creek says, "Cane Creek introduces more travel to the eeSilk lineup with the eeSilk+. With 35mm of travel, the eeSilk+ is a suspension seatpost designed to noticeably soften any gravel or mixed-surface road. Like our 20mm travel suspension seatpost, eeSilk, the eeSilk+ comes in both alloy and carbon, 27.2 and 31.6 mm options.

"The new eeSilk+ and eeSilk+ Carbon are performance suspension seatposts designed to add comfort and compliance to any bike without adding unnecessary weight. These posts make great enhancements to long gravel rides by reducing chatter transmitted from the surface to the rider and can be tuned to rider weight through a simple external elastomer change.

"The new eeSilk+ features stainless steel hardware and weighs less than 381g for the alloy post and less than 335g for the carbon post. eeSilk+ comes with an increased seatpost length of 387mm and eeSilk+ Carbon comes with a length of 362mm. The eeSilk+ Carbon comes with the same titanium hardware and custom titanium thumbwheel as the eeSilk Carbon.

"Like its shorter travel sister, eeSilk+ comes with 300-series stainless steel axles and IGUS bushings that sit within the Seatpost head and cradle to make for a more serviceable and quiet pivot design."

It's a great seatpost giving even more travel than the standard option for gravel or rough road riding.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Carbon or aluminium options

Forged and machined aluminium arms

Stainless steel pivots and axles with improved IGUS bushings

Interchangable elastomer for rider tuned spring rate

Di2 battery compatible

Travel - 35mm

Sizes: 27.2 and 31.6 (shims available for other sizes)

Length: Carbon - 362mm, Alloy - 387mm

Layback (offset) - 12mm

Weight: Carbon 323g (27.2) 333g (31.6), Alloy 373g (27.2) 378g (31.6)

Max rider weight - 113kg (250lbs)

Rate the product for quality of construction:
Rate the product for performance:
Rate the product for durability:
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)
Rate the product for value:

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

It's a suspension post that doesn't feel like a suspension post – in the best possible way.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Smooth and subtle action.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Nothing really.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on

It comes in cheaper (and a lot lighter) than the Redshift and Kinekt models mentioned in the review.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

This is a very well engineered product that performs impressively. Its ability to soak up bumps without feeling as if it is moving makes it a winner in my eyes, and the lower price (over the previous eeSilk) makes it competitive.

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 42  Height: 180cm  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: This month's test bike  My best bike is: B'Twin Ultra CF draped in the latest bling test components

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, fixed/singlespeed,

As part of the tech team here at F-At Digital, senior product reviewer Stu spends the majority of his time writing in-depth reviews for, and ebiketips using the knowledge gained from testing over 1,500 pieces of kit (plus 100's of bikes) since starting out as a freelancer back in 2009. After first throwing his leg over a race bike back in 2000, Stu's ridden more than 170,000 miles on road, time-trial, track, and gravel bikes, and while he's put his racing days behind him, he still likes to smash the pedals rather than take things easy. With a background in design and engineering, he has an obsession with how things are developed and manufactured, has a borderline fetish for handbuilt metal frames and finds a rim braked road bike very aesthetically pleasing!

Add new comment


Stu Kerton | 2 years ago
1 like

I'm continuing to run the eeSilk+ on my gravel bikes to see if any of the issues you both mention crop up on this one. I'll keep you posted over the next couple of months or so.


shufflingb | 2 years ago

"There is a tiny bit of lateral play if you wiggle the cradle from the top, but it's not noticeable when riding at all."

I had longer travel version of this in the form of the Thudbuster LT. That had similar bearings and also an initially unnoticeable amount of lateral play. However, the LT's unnoticeable lateral play very quickly (weeks) deterioated into loud, annoying creaks and clicks from the seat post whenever high torque low cadence efforts were involved.  Or at least that when they were at their most noticeable.

Saying this if I wasn't already using a RedShift seatpost (excellent), I  might still have been tempted to try the eeSilk. The Thudbuster LT handled bumps well and it's easy to imagine the shorter linkages of the eeSilk putting way less stress on the bearings and potentially avoiding the problems. However, if I was tempted I would seriously recommend checking the warranty t&c's beforehand, keeping the packaging and listen out for problems from the get-go ...

IanEdward | 2 years ago
1 like

This post is very well engineered and, as Dave mentioned in his review of the earlier eeSilk, he's been running the mountain bike equivalent (the Cane Creek Thudbuster) for the best part of twenty years with no issues. That bodes very well for reliability.

Did I get a bad one? My Thudbuster ST developed a lot of audible play and rattle in the bushings very quickly (within 1000km, if not less). So much so that I sent it back and the distributer very kindly replaced them all free of charge. Probably less than 500km later the play (and the audible rattle) was back again, so it's sitting in my spares box and I've gone back to rigid. This despite using the 'Thudglove' neoprene cover from the get-go.

I'd love to consider the eeSilk+ but not if I think regular bushing replacement will be a feature... How often has Dave replaced bushings on his Thudbuster?


Latest Comments