Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Boardman Road Team Carbon



A decently specced semi-race bike with a very good frameset at its heart

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Road Team Carbon continues the theme of fun and exhilarating bikes delivered by Boardman that also manage to offer excellent value for money. You can't argue with the performance or kit from this entry-level racer, and the frame is so good it'll be well worth upgrading the parts as and when you can.

Using Boardman's C7 grade carbon fibre, the Road Team Carbon (I'll just call it the Team from now on) isn't as outright stiff as the recently tested Boardman SLR Endurance Disc or the CXR 9.4, both of which use the top level C10 grade. It's only a tiny amount of difference, but anyway the little extra give in the tubes and junctions gives it a bit of zing about it, and actually makes the Team more involving to ride.

> Find your nearest dealer here

> Buy this online here

I described the SLR Endurance Disc as having a bit of a muted ride, not really giving a whole lot of feedback to the rider, though it was quick. The Team is a different beast altogether, feeling buzzy and exciting because you are involved with everything: the feeling of the changing road surface underneath you, or the way it skips over the bumps, leaving the ground slightly under really heavy braking on a rough descent... It all adds to the feeling of being at one with or part of the bike.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - riding 2.jpg

You want to keep pushing it harder and harder, despite knowing that at some point it could go pear-shaped; you want to find that limit so you then know how far you can push it the next time.

The Team shares the same geometry as the SLR Endurance, which means the handling is quick but never feels twitchy, so should your tyres break traction slightly front or rear it's really easy to keep control. It's very reassuring, especially if you aren't the most confident of bike handlers and find yourself in a bit of trouble.

The Team isn't quite as racy as its big brother in Boardman's performance range, the Pro Carbon SLR, which was our bike of the year a couple of years back. But consider the Team as a stepping stone, something to hone your skills on before you maybe consider racing.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - riding 1.jpg

It's not all about speed, speed, speed though. As I mentioned, the Team shares the same geometry as the SLR Endurance – although that doesn't exactly put you in a sit up and beg position; the SLR Endurance models are pretty much the most racy 'sportive' bikes on the market. They and the Team have a stack to reach ratio of just 1.44 in medium. (Race bikes are 1.4 or below; endurance bikes are around 1.55.)

Boardman Road Team Carbon.jpg

The Team is a good bike to tap out a quick ride on – well, you might want to change that saddle first. I really didn't get on with its firm padding or the shape (or lack of).

Boardman Road Team Carbon - saddle.jpg

Saddle changed, I did a few three to four-hour rides on the Team and it was ideal for covering all sorts of terrain at a decent lick.

The frame uses a press-fit bottom bracket, which means the frame can be wider at this point because the bearing cups, as you have no doubt guessed, are pressed into the frame rather than screwed in with the bearings left externally.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - bottom bracket.jpg

The bottom bracket shell is larger in diameter too, to accept the cups, so this means you get a meaty old frame in this area, with large chainstays and down tube to match.

This makes for a stiff bottom half of the frame to resist pedalling forces when really going for it, either on the flat or when climbing. In fact the only thing that stops the Boardman from whipping up the hills are the heavy Mavic CXP-Elite wheels. They are pretty retro looking on a bike like this, not just because of their 28/32 spoke lacing front and rear bur also their width. While virtually every wheel rim these days has widened to at least 24mm externally, the Mavics are a mere 20mm, which gives the 25mm Vittoria Zaffiro Pro tyres an actual width of 24mm.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - rim.jpg

They are solid wheels though, and would make for a great training set or for winter use, plus the tyres are pretty robust and grippy as well.

Trying out the Deda Elementi SL38 carbon wheelset I was also testing on the Boardman made a massive difference to how the bike climbed and accelerated. Obviously most people aren't going to fit a £1,300 wheelset to a £1,000 bike, but it does highlight how upgradable this frame is.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - seat tube junction.jpg

The SL38s are wider at 26mm too, with the 25mm Schwalbe tyres stretching out to 27mm, which did make the clearance look a little bit tight. The Team will actually take full mudguards too, with mounts front and rear, so if you're going to fit some you'll need to take that into account when choosing new wheels/tyres.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - front brake.jpg

Steering and braking are both helped by the tapered head tube and matching fork steerer. The larger diameter lower section increases the cross-sectional area, resulting in a slightly stiffer front end, and the fork legs and crown are also increased in size to match.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - head tube.jpg

I've mentioned how the handling isn't twitchy but it is still quick enough to carve a smooth line through the bends, and while it isn't quite as sharp as the racier Pro Carbon SLR, as long as things aren't overly technical or you want to really smash it through a chicane, you won't be left wanting.

Stop and go

One thing that will stop you taking too many risks on the descents, though, are the brakes. The Tektro R540 callipers feel pretty spongy, especially when you really haul on them hard. The pads have quite a hard compound, with a very on/off feel; you don't get any sort of feedback to know whether to feather the brakes a touch or when to adjust the pressure on the lever. It certainly made me give way more thought to my stopping distances, especially in the wet.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - rear brake.jpg

Shimano's Tiagra 4700 groupset is a lovely bit of kit, basically 105 5800 missing a click, Tiagra being 10-speed rather than 11-speed. The only really noticeable difference was that the downshift on the rear mech wasn't quite as crisp as the more expensive groupsets, but that's it.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - rear mech.jpg

With a 12-28 cassette you get a decent spread of gears when matched to the 50/34 chainset up front, although spending most of my time on 11-speed I did miss the 11-tooth sprocket. The jumps between gears at the rear are two teeth for the majority of the sprockets, with only the top few having a three-tooth jump, so you never really find yourself between gears.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - front mech.jpg

It's a shame not to see a Tiagra crankset for a complete look, but Boardman has obviously gone with the FSA Gossamer because it is BB30, which means it uses a 30mm axle for added stiffness over a standard 24mm that Shimano uses. It is possible to use a Shimano crankset in BB30s by way of adaptors, but it kind of negates the claimed benefits of the larger axle.

Finishing kit

The finishing kit is all Boardman branded and it's simple and effective stuff, and alloy throughout. The bar has a compact drop allowing plenty of hand options, and when paired with the reasonably tall 160m head tube gives even the least flexible of riders the chance to get into the drops.

Boardman Road Team Carbon - bars.jpg

Boardman seems to have gone with 31.6mm seatposts throughout its range and it does make for a firm rear end, especially on a bike that is quite tight anyway. I didn't have any overall comfort issues (apart from that saddle), but if you did you could reduce the seat tube diameter with something like a USE shim and swap the seatpost for a 27.2mm one.


A thousand pounds is a very competitive price point, seeing frames of varying materials. I'm a big metal fan and normally at this price point I'd take an aluminium alloy frame over cheap carbon, but Boardman has shown here that a good carbon frame can be delivered at this price point. Obvious cost savings have been made with the wheels, brakes and that saddle, but they are all things you can tweak and upgrade for minimal outlay.

> 18 of the best road bikes under £1,000

Ribble's Gran Fondo (we tested the Disc version here) could be a competitor, and with a similar build comes in at £1,145.99, although the Boardman Team has a sportier ride plus possibly wins on comfort ever so slightly.

A thorn in its side could be the Specialized Allez E5 Sport, with the 2017 model being very good indeed, even though you drop another gear going 9-speed with a Sora groupset, and it's an alloy frame, if that bothers you.

For 2018 the Spesh has had a makeover (which we are currently testing), with a new frame and a price increase by £50 to £799.99, which is still quite a bargain if you can cope with the gaps in the gearing.


Overall the Boardman Team is a decent build with a very good frameset at its heart. With a lighter set of wheels and probably an upgrade to those brakes you could so easily race this bike right up through the ranks.


A decently specced semi-race bike with a very good frameset at its heart test report

Make and model: Boardman Road Team Carbon

Size tested: Medium

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Boardman lists:


C7 Full Carbon

Full Carbon with Tapered Steerer

FSA No.42 w/ 15mm Standard Top Cap



FSA Gossamer


Shimano Tiagra

Shimano Tiagra

Shimano Tiagra

Tektro R540 Dual Pivot Calliper Brakes

Tektro R540 Dual Pivot Calliper Brakes

Shimano CS-HG500-10, 12-28T


Boardman Road Saddle

Boardman Alloy, 31.6mm

Boardman Alloy

Boardman Alloy Drop Bar


Mavic CXP-Elite 28/32 Hole

Vittoria Zaffiro Pro 700x25c

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

Boardman says: "The Road Team Carbon is based around our SLR Endurance C7 carbon frame and fork providing unparalleled power transfer, comfort and handling. Specced with the all-new smooth and precise Shimano Tiagra gearset, powerful Tektro dual pivot brakes and fast rolling Vittoria tyres, the Road Team carbon provides a comfortable ride experience, along with the performance to keep up with your ambition."

A near race ready bike for a very sensible price.

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

Both the frame and fork use Boardman's C7 grade carbon fibre, which is slightly less refined than its top-end high-modulus C10 grade, though it doesn't detract from the ride.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

The geometry actually matches that of Boardman's SLR Endurance range, which is ideal at this price point as a lot of new riders don't want a bike that is very twitchy or quick handling. Though the Team is no slouch either.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

This size model has a stack to reach ratio of 1.44 which is still quite race-orientated.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

Yes, the ride quality was pretty good, with a little bit of give in the frame compared to the super-stiff top-end framesets.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

Yes, there was no issue with the stiffness levels of the Team at all; it's exactly where I'd expect it to be for a bike of this type.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

The frame is very good at transferring power without much in the way of flex.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?


How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? Lively without being twitchy.

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

The Team is a very fun bike to ride, having quick handling without it being a handful.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

For me, getting rid of the saddle: it's too firm and the wrong shape.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The alloy finishing kit is pretty stiff and ideal for this kind of bike.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's efficiency? would you recommend any changes?

An upgrade to lighter wheels makes a massive difference to the ride.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
Rate the bike for acceleration:
Rate the bike for sprinting:
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
Rate the bike for climbing:

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
Rate the drivetrain for value:

Tell us some more about the drivetrain. Anything you particularly did or didn't like? Any components which didn't work well together?

The Tiagra setup is what you'd expect at this price point and it works very well.

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels for performance:
Rate the wheels for durability:
Rate the wheels for weight:
Rate the wheels for comfort:
Rate the wheels for value:

Tell us some more about the wheels.Did they work well in the conditions you encountered? Would you change the wheels? If so, what for?

The wheels aren't bad by any stretch of the imagination, but their weight does affect the ride of the excellent frame.

Rate the tyres for performance:
Rate the tyres for durability:
Rate the tyres for weight:
Rate the tyres for comfort:
Rate the tyres for value:

Tell us some more about the tyres. Did they work well in the conditions you encountered? Would you change the tyres? If so, what for?

Decent performers for the money but as with the wheels, the frame deserves better.


Rate the controls for performance:
Rate the controls for durability:
Rate the controls for weight:
Rate the controls for comfort:
Rate the controls for value:

Tell us some more about the controls. Any particularly good or bad components? How would the controls work for larger or smaller riders?

An all-alloy setup, which is expected at this level.

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes

Would you consider buying the bike? Yes, I was very impressed with the frameset.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes

Rate the bike overall for performance:
Rate the bike overall for value:

Use this box to explain your score

At the heart of this bike is a very good carbon fibre frameset which is ripe for upgrades. It's great to see a bike for a grand that has very similar attributes to the Pro Carbon SLR but with a more relaxed attitude for those who don't want a racer.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 38  Height: 180cm  Weight: 76kg

I usually ride: This month's test bike  My best bike is: Kinesis Aithein

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, fixed/singlespeed

As part of the tech team here at F-At Digital, senior product reviewer Stu spends the majority of his time writing in-depth reviews for, and ebiketips using the knowledge gained from testing over 1,500 pieces of kit (plus 100's of bikes) since starting out as a freelancer back in 2009. After first throwing his leg over a race bike back in 2000, Stu's ridden more than 170,000 miles on road, time-trial, track, and gravel bikes, and while he's put his racing days behind him, he still likes to smash the pedals rather than take things easy. With a background in design and engineering, he has an obsession with how things are developed and manufactured, has a borderline fetish for handbuilt metal frames and finds a rim braked road bike very aesthetically pleasing!

Add new comment


Dnnnnnn | 6 years ago
1 like

Sounds decent but the Ribble R872 has 105 throughout for the same price, and lets you tailor the spec to suit. A chunk lighter too. Not in your local Halfords, of course.

Latest Comments