Arofly power meter

3
£100.32

VERDICT:

3
10
An affordable power meter, but we didn't find it to deliver useable data
Weight: 
11g
Contact: 

The Arofly power meter is lightweight and affordable but we've found that it simply doesn't provide measurements that are consistent enough that it can be considered a useful training tool.

Arofly is unique in that it attaches to the valve stem of your rear inner tube. It's larger than a dust cap but is still very small with a 20mm diameter and a weight of 11g, including the CR 1632 battery that lives in there and the Presta adaptor (if you need one, see below).

> Buy this online here

If you use a Schrader valve the Arofly just screws directly on to it. The valve pin needs to make a good contact with an 'Air Post' in the centre of the Arofly, beyond the thread, in order for you to get readings.

If you use a Presta valve you need to loosen the valve screw, then tighten an Arofly adaptor in place – just a small threaded piece – and finally screw the Arofly on. Again, the valve pin needs to contact the Arofly's Air Post. I've used the Arofly with Presta valves and found that it works easily on some but not on others. You need to find an inner tube with a tall enough valve pin. Once up and running it has stayed up and running without dropping out.

Then you need to download the Arofly app, available free for both Android (OS 4.3 or later) and iOS (iPhone 4S, 5, 5S, 6, 6 Plus or later), on to your smartphone and pair the device with the app via Bluetooth. You input a few details: the units you want to use, the type of bike you're using – road, mountain or small wheel – and so on, and you're good to go.

The Arofly will not talk to other head units so you can't have the power figure displayed on your Garmin, say, you have to mount your smartphone to your handlebar/stem. A basic smartphone mount comes as part of the pack, although you'd get better security with something like a Quad Lock Bike Kit.

The app must be open and running while you ride. It gives you this information as you go:

* Current speed

* Time of day

* Arofly's battery status

* Cadence

* Power

* Ride time

* Distance

* Heart rate (if you've paired a heart rate monitor with the app)

* Cumulative ascent

There's just one display page and it isn't customisable. You can't, for example, have your power as a 3-second or 10-second average, and there's no auto-pause function – you need to do that manually if you stop.

Assuming you do that, the app gives you this info when you're done:

* A map of your ride

* Ride time

* Ride distance

* Average speed

* Average cadence

* Average power

* Calories burned

It also gives you graphs that show:

* Speed

* Power

* Cadence

* Heart rate (it you've paired a heart rate monitor)

* Ascent

Those graphs are small on a smartphone and you can't zoom in on them so you're better off pressing the 'Upload to Strava' button and viewing the information over there. If you like, you can then export a TCX file of your ride from Strava and transfer it somewhere else.

How does it work?

Okay, let's go back a bit: a power meter that attaches to your inner tube valve – how does that work? 

"Originating from aerospace technology, Arofly is the result of years of research and cooperation between aerospace scientists and sports biomechanics professors, developing a patented air pressure differential technology based on the pitot tube design," according to Arofly.

'Through core and patented algorithm and advanced calibration technology the precise pedalling power is registered and with that the cycling performance.'

Hmmm, okay. That doesn't reveal a lot. Like me, your first reaction is probably scepticism. How could it possibly work? Fitting strain gauges in a chainset spider, crank arm, pedal or hub: that makes sense. Fitting a power meter to an inner tube valve? It's a mental hurdle, to say the least. The big question is, does the Arofly provide useful power data?

We always review power meters by comparing the results from one system to those of others. It's difficult to say categorically that one is right and one is wrong, but we can look for discrepancies.

I've used the Arofly alongside a CycleOps PowerTap hub and a Stages crank-based system. The results I've got from the Arofly are very different from those I've obtained from either of the other two.

Take this ride as an example, where I've ridden a bike with the Arofly paired up to an iPhone and a PowerTap hub paired to a Stages Dash head unit. I've transferred the data from both devices to GoldenCheetah in order to compare the results. The power readings from the PowerTap are in green, the power readings from the Arofly are in violet.

Arofly v PowerTap graph.jpg

What I did on this ride was warm up, then do four hill reps of about 5:50mins each, riding downhill and on the flat for around 3mins between each, then rode home. In other words, it was a structured workout with definite start/finish points for every section.

The first rep starts at 11mins, the second one at about 20mins, the third one at 29mins and the fourth one at 38mins.

The PowerTap data shows what I'd expect: four periods of power with very little effort as I went back to the start between each of them.

The Arofly data for the first rep is hardly distinguishable from the warm-up in the main, although there's one peak at the end of the interval. It does indicate that there was less power in the rest period between intervals, but with several peaks in there that I can't explain.

> Tour Tech 2017: Power meters of the peloton

The second interval is clearer, although I was aiming to ride it in a similar way to the first (and that was reflected in the PowerTap data).

The Arofly picks up the rest period after the second interval and then the work during the third interval, although the peaks and troughs don't track those from the PowerTap particularly closely. Then there's quite a big spike in the Arofly's data halfway between the third and fourth intervals. I really couldn't tell you what that's about because I wasn't pedalling at the time... And so on.

I rode the first two intervals seated, and stood up on the pedals at times during intervals three and four to see if that made a difference to the data. That seems to have resulted in higher peaks from the Arofly.

Even trying to be generous, it's difficult to reconcile the Arofly measurements with those of the PowerTap to any great degree. The power graph goes up during the work intervals (well, it does for intervals two, three and four, at least) and drops during the rest intervals, but this was a very defined session and you'd be hard pressed to discern that from the Arofly's data.

Conclusion

I'd love to be able to tell you that, against all odds, Arofly supplies power measurement that's good enough to train by, but my experience is that it doesn't. I've not managed to use it as the basis of training sessions because the figures are too inconsistent. Sorry.

The team behind Arofly says that development has been continuing over the past few months and that it jumped the gun in sending us a product back in March.

> Buyer's Guide: How to choose a cycling power meter

It says that any shortfalls in performance are down to the app, which is being improved, and will be addressed by the Arofly+ which is a rechargeable head unit that's designed to work with the valve-mounted device. The Arofly+ will be unveiled at the Eurobike cycle show in Germany in a couple of weeks.

The team says it has ploughed a huge amount of money into the development of the system and it really believes that it has a 'game changer' of a product here.

There will have to be big changes in the results before I could think of recommending this product.

Verdict

An affordable power meter, but we didn't find it to deliver useable data

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the road.cc Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website

road.cc test report

Make and model: Arofly power meter

Size tested: One

Tell us what the product is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

The Arofly is designed to be an inexpensive power meter.

Arofly says: "Arofly is an epoch-making innovation in cycling power meter.

"By its patented brand-new technology and measurement, Arofly provides most affordable and most user-friendly Power Meter to benefit general cyclists.

"Arofly provides a state of the art power meter which displays overall biking data in real time, for people who enjoy cycling and may have their own Arofly, at a very affordable price.

"Arofly assists the biker ride right to achieve and complete their goal with perfection."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Here's the spec as given by Arofly:

Size: diameter 2cm

Weight: 10g

Bike compatibility: Road bike, Mountain bike, BMX...

Operating temperature: -30 °C to + 85 °C

Water proof, Dust proof

Battery type: CR 1632

Transmission: Via Bluetooth version 4.0; Frequency: 2.4GHz

Compatible Smartphone: iPhone 4S, 5, 5S, 6, 6 Plus or later Android Smart phone Mobile OS 4.3 or later

Rate the product for quality of construction:
 
4/10
Rate the product for performance:
 
3/10
Rate the product for durability:
 
5/10
Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
 
6/10

It is very light, but something like a Stages or 4iiii power meter adds only a few grams to the overall weight of your bike.

Rate the product for value:
 
3/10

It doesn't cost a lot compared with other power meters, but in my experience it doesn't give useable power measurement.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Poorly.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

The price... but only if it actually provided useable data.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

The fact that the data isn't consistent.

Did you enjoy using the product? No

Would you consider buying the product? No

Would you recommend the product to a friend? No

Use this box to explain your score

The Arofly gets some points for picking up general trends in power (mostly) but my experience is that this device just doesn't give data that's consistent enough to be useable for training by power.  

Overall rating: 3/10

About the tester

Age: 43  Height: 190cm  Weight: 75kg

I usually ride:   My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. We send him off around the world to get all the news from launches and shows too. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now pushing 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Latest Comments