At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Exactly this. He isn't threatening anybody. He's just stating that they drive very large, potentially dangerous vehicles and it would be in...
So Trek spend goodness knows how many thousands of dollars trying to save a few seconds then you see pictures of their riders with open jerseys...
"It will travel at a pace determined by the conditions and what is happening on the road"......
My LEGOG had two pairs of these super shorts on rotation last month. 1442km never passed so easy. I would highly recommend them also with...
So sorry that I can only like this once.
For £57.99 I'd rather get something that looks crap but is comfortable and lasts rather than looking well but falls apart after 5 rides. I've had...
The Metro write-up was ridiculous, they reported it as the council 'telling' cyclists not to use cycle lanes. Contained interviews with the usual...
Acting as a spokesperson?
Sorry to burst your bubble and your rant but I think you'll find if a law has been written in such a way so that it contravenes the "reasonable...
Is it just me or do they seem more concerned about the post being hit than the cyclist?