At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I was both a BC and CUK member for years, wanting to support UK cycling as much as possible. I was an amateur racer too but even back at the...
Yep, it brought the Paul's mechs to my mind too. Could look cracking on a 90's resto MTB project. Klein or Pace frame maybe 🤔.
"Do you want me to wash it for you?" "can you do me a blowout?"* * Yeah ok I looked that one up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hairstyles
Of course not! I will be chasing up after Christmas, no point in doing so now as they will just point to "hopefully" and "in December".
YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE, A RED LIGHT MEANS STOP...
Yes it's all very expensive. However, the article seems to suggest you get the saddle. a fit with Phil Burt, and possibly a check later - which if...
Another one for "great time saver you've got there":...
They most certainly do "separate like that"....
Thanks Neil!
All arguments I am hopeful to see validated, especially (a) and (b) combined....