At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
It's worse than that though, isn't it? The momentary lapse of concentration defence is usually a winner. In a car it is seen as quite acceptable...
It doesn't really prove anything, you might have recorded 4000 miles on zwift for all I know - the point I was making was that you've accused me of...
From my experience of Oxfordshire roads, that is likely to be after padding and image stabilisation.
I have absolutely no idea what you are getting at there . . . . . .
yes porpoising has been around since well before CFD existed, its a well known ground effect phenomenon, but I do think the worst extremes we are...
I purchased a Ribble on Jan 6th 2022 and it finally arrived on the 22nd June 2022....A painful wait!
And just like that, probably not PBU but another of the same set of drive-through opinions did precisely that on t'other thread.
This is quite right , frankly I don't think the plod want to be bothered with these pesky cyclists, they actually have the affrontery to take up...
"Feel" / "had to"....
Thank you, most enlightening.