A “victim blaming” row has broken out on social media, after a cyclist uploaded footage of what he described as the “closest pass I’ve ever seen”, featuring a horn-blaring van driver who clipped a rider in rush hour traffic, in an apparent fit of road rage – only to be greeted by hundreds of responses, including one from a Conservative councillor, criticising the cyclist and claiming he should have been riding in the cycle lane.
The shocking incident, uploaded to X (formerly Twitter) by the Chapona Bike account and already viewed over a million times, took place on 30 April at around 6pm, on west London’s Grosvenor Road.
The 36-second clip shows camera cyclist Chapona Bike riding westbound on the road as a car horn can be heard from behind, prompting him to move back into the road’s semi-protected cycle lane.
However, as another cyclist makes his way past on the road, a van driver – continuing to blare his horn – passes him as they head under a bridge, towards oncoming traffic. The van driver then appears to clip the cyclist with his wing mirror during the dangerous overtake, causing him to wobble as he narrowly avoids a potential crash.
Absolute madness. That’s the closest pass I’ve ever seen. Shocking behaviour. No doubt punishment for “not being in the cycle lane”. pic.twitter.com/sZA1WfZynO
— Chapona Bike (@ChaponaBike123) April 30, 2025
“Absolute madness. That’s the closest pass I’ve ever seen,” Chapona Bike posted on X alongside the video. “Shocking behaviour. No doubt punishment for ‘not being in the cycle lane’.”
Expanding on the incident, Chapona Bike told road.cc: “It was a busy evening, and motorists were almost gridlocked, given the normal rush hour traffic
“The van driver was clearly upset that a cyclist overtook him, started sounding their horn, and looks like they clipped the cyclist with their wing mirror in an apparent revenge attack.
“They were then only able to get ahead a few metres before getting stuck in the traffic again, at which point I saw him trying to get out of his van in a fit of rage.”

However, after his close pass clip went viral this week, Chapona Bike has been inundated with replies claiming that the cyclist was at fault for not using the Grosvenor Road’s cycle lane.
“Why isn’t he in his own, safer cycle lane?” one of the comments, from Stefan Kenson, asked.
“Who knows?” replied the road.cc reader. “But unless you’re there to ask him, the only evidence you’ve got is a driver sounding their horn and trying to ram a cyclist off the road. All to gain an advantage of what, 20 metres, until they are impeded by other motorists waiting at the traffic lights”.
“If cyclists are going to cycle like this, we might as well abolish cycle lanes,” added Marv, prompting Chapona to respond with: “If drivers are going to drive like this, we might as well abolish roads.”
Even those critical of the motorist’s actions also claimed that the cyclist was responsible for causing the tension that led to the driver’s fit of road rage.
“The van driver deserves everything that’s coming to him but it’s almost like the cyclist is looking for confrontation,” wrote Garry.
“He could easily have kept to the cycle lane but refused, attitudes between cyclists and drivers will never change if they continue to act in this way.”
“It was slow moving traffic, the cycle lane was busy, and the cyclist had every right to overtake,” replied Chapona Bike. “Or are you saying they’re not allowed to overtake, and only drivers are?”

Meanwhile, even Conservative councillor Kevin Buck, a member of Southend-on-Sea Borough Council, got involved, criticising cyclists who “refuse” to use bike lanes when they’re provided.
“Not, repeat NOT, defending the driver of the vehicle, however, cyclists often and rightly complain they have no dedicated cycling infrastructure, yet when it’s provided, still refuse to use it!” Buck wrote. “Some do not help themselves!”
> The Highway Code for cyclists — all the rules you need to know for riding on the road explained
Contrary to what many on X may believe, it is not compulsory for cyclists to use cycle lanes and other infrastructure where it is provided, with the Highway Code noting that people on bikes can use them “where they make your journey safer and easier”.
“This will depend on your experience and skills and the situation at the time,” rule 61 of the code says. “While such facilities are provided for reasons of safety, cyclists may exercise their judgment and are not obliged to use them.”
“Cyclists aren’t obliged to use cycle lanes, and the cyclist was acting perfectly and in accordance with the Highway Code,” Chapona Bike told road.cc on Friday. “There is nothing wrong with a cyclist overtaking other cyclists. Plenty of space.
“The responses to the video are absolutely shocking, and sum up the state of the ‘war against cyclists’. Which wasn’t helped when a certain Prime Minister coined the #waragainstmotorists tag.
“Everything always seems to be a cyclist’s fault, including being a victim of a road rage incident. I won’t begin to try and sum up the comments, but the usual vile abuse starts, the wishes of harm, the violent threats, the accusations of being a sex offender. The list goes on.
“I hope my footage helps raise awareness and shows just how vulnerable cyclists are, as we need to encourage more people into bikes, and out of their motor vehicles, to solve this perpetual problem of gridlock and congestion.
“Trying to ram a cyclist off the road is deplorable. Drivers like this need taken off our roads.”





















34 thoughts on ““It’s always the cyclist’s fault”: Driver blasts horn and clips cyclist with wing mirror in “closest pass I’ve ever seen” – but motorists say “he should have been in the cycle lane””
Onion’s Law “there is no
Onion’s Law “there is no example of bad driving which some people on the internet can’t twist into somehow being the fault of a cyclist”.
“Not, repeat NOT, defending
“Not, repeat NOT, defending the driver of the vehicle, however, cyclists often and rightly complain they have no dedicated cycling infrastructure, yet when it’s provided, still refuse to use it!” Buck wrote. “Some do not help themselves!”
Given the number of conservative councillors (thankfully many fewer after today) who criticise cyclists, I wonder how many of them ride bikes? The only problem being that their places have mostly been taken by Reform councillors, who promise a lot of the same things, but much, much worse.
If you say not and then
If you say not and then repeat not doesn’t that mean that you are actually defending the driver of the vehicle? “I’m not NOT defending him…”
In my experience, when
In my experience, when someone follows a statement (or an apology) with “but” or “however”, then they usually mean the opposite of what they just said.
Not always. The problem is
Not always. The problem is nuance has been lost these days. People these days want a binary extreme position of this or that, and nothing in between.
I once got a good telling off
I once got a good telling off for deviating out of a cycle lane for ‘disbalancing whilst having a drink’… – I thought I’d committed murder considering the excited behaviour of the ‘car driver’…
The best comment on X is this
The best comment on X is this one: “Cars can’t overtake when it’s busy so cyclists in a busy cycle lane shouldn’t either.” This pretty well sums the moto thinking here.
That cyclists can get around quicker in many cities in many situations enrages the hell out of some element of the motoring community. This creates a unique form of road rage, something that itself begins with motorists being stuck in traffic.
But this thing we might call “cycle rage” is so serious and so twisted that the majority of motorists commenting on X absolutely and totally miss the fact that the motorist had to speed up to hit the cyclist only to be forced to hit the brakes five seconds later due to the road being blocked by more MV traffic.
Or, to put this simply, the motorist had to accelerate to clip a cyclist who in no way impeded the motorist’s commute.
One has to wonder what the reaction would have been if the van had rammed the rear of a slower-moving vehicle just to get to the next traffic blockage five seconds faster? Five seconds….
I’ve been stopped for a longer time behind some fool preoccupied with reading a text when a red light turns green.
Someone tell the Tory that
Someone tell the Tory that getting upset about cyclists getting ahead is just the politics of envy.
So was it reported to the
So was it reported to the police?
Googled Kevin Buck, and
Googled Kevin Buck, and apparently he had to undergo social media training a couple of years ago. Looks like it didn’t work
Edit – forgot to mention the training was ordered by the Conservative party. Maybe it actually worked perfectly
Also, respect to the cyclist
Also, respect to the cyclist for staying calm and carrying on. On a bad day, I’d have definitely been tempted to smash that wing mirror off
Bad idea, it would hurt for
Bad idea, it would hurt for one thing unless you had a handy DLock, but then it’s criminal damage, so you’d be on a loser with the police/courts.
Also the van driver has given more than enough evidence, they’re abit of a psycho. If their reaction to you simply existing in front of them is that, wtf they going to do if you damage their van ?
I know it’s not a good idea,
I know it’s not a good idea, hence my first sentence, but I wouldn’t be too worried if I did damage it
The traffic was pretty gridlocked, it wouldn’t be hard to cycle away. The driver can react however they want, as long as they can somehow catch up
Re. police/courts etc, I’d be perfectly happy to stand up in court and argue that damaging a wing mirror in reaction to a dangerous close pass pales in comparison to nearly killing someone
well good luck with that, but
well good luck with that, but I hope you never have to put it to the test.
Cyclist unidentifiable,
Cyclist unidentifiable, psycho van driver stuck in traffic…
and you know for sure there
and you know for sure there are no police in the vicinity who witnessed the event or who could step in as required ? or any other individuals willing to step in.
I bet these ebike riders thought the same… https://www.devonlive.com/news/e-bike-riders-crash-walkers-10146148
The police appeared to have
The police appeared to have been there purposely with the aim of catching them in the act though. Presumably as a result of multiple reports of those types crashing or near missing walkers on that promenade.
While that London situation was a random encounter.
Same here
Same here
Zero common sense from those
Zero common sense from those offering opinions when most have never had to travel round on a bike. They make cars that can drive themselves, robot motorbike riders that can be loaded with any pro racers data (impressive and kinda scary display). Yet cycling has been proven to be more mentally complex than simply driving. Every rider deals with multitasking the fact the lane was next to them is irrelevant, from images it’s hard to tell where they joined the route but they seem to be moving at the same speed as the rider to their left. Incidentally said rider looks to be physically half their size/build so merging could be a bad idea, from just two still shots it looks like they’re trying to make a push ahead for overtaking. Still the car driver is a douche and safe overtaking is encouraged for ALL road users…..
Though for those other nastier road rage incidents I like to remind drivers I’m an ex mechanic shhhh 🤣
All irrelevant as in the UK
All irrelevant as in the UK cycling on the road is legally allowed regardless if there is a cycle lane or not. It is a choice the cyclist makes. By the way, that cycle lane there should be at least 3 times wider for that volume of cyclists.
whosatthewheel wrote:
Exactly – in the UK (almost!) all roads are legally just very wide and well maintained shared-use paths
And then the van just gets
And then the van just gets caught in a long line of traffic. As usual. They are such hate addled idiots these van drivers.
Another driver that cannot
Another driver that cannot see further than the end of their gonads.
Please keep us updated on
Please keep us updated on this.
The Met police must take action against the driver.
This was NOT a “close pass”. It was deliberate contact by the driver.
An attempted ABH/GBH/murder.
The cycle lane was pretty
The cycle lane was pretty busy and riders don’t have to use it anyway. The driver got absolutely no benefit from that dangerous overtake in any case, just getting to the same place at the back of the same queue maybe 2 seconds earlier. If drivers can’t look ahead and see this, they might as well give up driving altogether. It’s a terrible example of driving and the person behind the wheel of the van could do with a ban, giving them some time to think about whether driving is for them at all.
Unfortunately those that hate
Unfortunately those that hate the cyclists are now running large areas of the country. We need to brace ourselves for an attack on cycling infrastructure in those areas and get ready to defend them.
Seeing the outsize influence
It’s actually the case that those who don’t care much about cyclists have been running the country since the last election (except for devolved matters) and now – thanks to the the outsize influence of the US president and crew, plus another squeeze on money (also thanks to them)… our government have got lots of reasons to “go back to basics” -and cut anything that doesn’t look like providing for the “majority of working people” e.g. driving!
(It would eventually save us lots of money to prioritise active travel and public transport … but we’d have to “spend to save” initially. And of course the howls from e.g. businesses in “ruined” high streets would be the most salient thing).
Also noting that while it’s not a good result for active travel some of those places now run by Reform councillors were somewhat “lost causes” for cycling anyway e.g. much of Lincolnshire… (more’s the pity of course because that’s where Holland is! Plus it’s mostly flat … but it’s also rural).
Just been checking it out now
Just been checking it out now, some nice rides there. Ideal cycling country, a potential moneyspinner for the local tourist industry.
chrisonabike wrote:
. . . . the car was invented?
this is when firearms become
this is when firearms become the solution…..
( I must add, I do not believe this is correct response; it is far better to let it go and forget about it than catastrophically change your life (the same applies to the driver))…..however, without proper judical intervention in these circumstances, catastrophe will become consequential.
We should be campaigning
We should be campaigning against press and media usage of the word “clip(ped) in relation to road traffic incidents involving a cyclist where terms like “rammed” or “collided with” would give a more realistic description of the incident.
We go to a hairdresser or manicurist to be clipped, both of these services can be pleasurable and devoid of near death experiences.
We should be campaigning
We should be campaigning against press and media usage of the word “clip(ped) in relation to road traffic incidents involving a cyclist
Very good point! It’s a word that seems designed by drivers and the police to signify ‘only a tiny bit of a hit, nothing at all to worry about’, and to justify close-passing even more than they justify it already
Rory26 wrote:
It would have been a great ending to see the cyclist ‘clip’ the driver’s head with a D-Lock.
Send it to the cops.
Send it to the cops.