A “dangerous” moped-riding thug who deliberately targeted cyclists, kicking victims from their bikes and causing significant injuries, has been jailed for 18 months.
Davontay Higgins filmed and uploaded footage of his attacks to Snapchat, the moped rider covering his number plate and wearing a balaclava as he targeted lone cyclists in south London.
The 21-year-old was this week sentenced at Kingston Crown Court having previously pleaded guilty to two counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and two of dangerous driving in relation to two attacks on cyclists, in August and October last year.
We shared footage of one of the attacks at the time, the video having been uploaded to Snapchat by Higgins. It showed the second of the two incidents, Higgins kicking a commuting cyclist into a parked car at around 15mph in Southfields. The court heard how the victim of that attack suffered head, back and shoulder injuries and required hospital treatment.
The first incident happened in Tooting a couple of months earlier and involved Higgins following a cyclist for 10 to 15 minutes and ultimately kicking the terrified rider off their bike, causing bleeding and other injuries which required an ambulance to attend the scene.
“I still don’t know why he did it,” the rider told road.cc following this week’s sentencing. “The defence council said that his client was sorry and offered all sorts of explanations, but didn’t say why he did it.”
The cyclist, who does not wish to be named, managed to film the attack [above, link to YouTube here if video above says unavailable]. It happened on 27 August 2024 as the cyclist rode from Wimbledon towards Earlsfield. Higgins followed the victim for around 10 to 15 minutes, filming as it unfolded.
At one point the cyclist rode onto the pavement to try to get away from Higgins, putting railings between them, but the moped rider again chased him afterwards, eventually kicking the rider from his bike, taunting the victim as he drove away filming on his phone.
“In addition to the physical injuries, you have caused distress and made him anxious about his safety when cycling and made him afraid that he might be subject to further attack for no reason,” judge Georgia Kent said at sentencing. “He was also being caused distress and concern that you were video recording him especially when he discovered that you posted a video on social media of your other victim.
“The victims were obviously vulnerable because of their circumstances — they were cyclists in the road and you were a moped rider. You also used the highly dangerous weapon equivalent by using your shod foot in combination with your moped to kick them with force and cause them to fall from their bicycles with predictable injuries.
“I am satisfied that your offending taken together is so serious that only a custodial sentence can be justified […] these are two very serious offences of deliberate dangerous driving targeting vulnerable cyclists […] these offences were committed in quick succession and you filmed them.
“It should have been obvious to you that you deliberately risked causing these cyclists extremely serious injuries — if not worse. I am satisfied that the seriousness of these offences taken together means that appropriate punishment can only be achieved by immediate custody.”
Higgins was sentenced to 18 months in prison and broke down in tears and called for his mother in court. He has also been disqualified from driving for two years and nine months.
The Standard reported how Higgins’ defence had claimed he was “vulnerable” and displayed a “lack of maturity” and had “mental health issues”.
“He is not proud of what he did and he is ashamed,” defence barrister Tim Banks told the court. “He has struggled with his mental health. There is a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.”
Higgins’ footage of the second attack went viral online, the Metropolitan Police later identifying him as a suspect and naming him in an appeal.

In March, the case was stopped by the CPS due to fears about a lack of evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction. However, a month later, this was reversed upon review, the Crown Prosecution Service deeming it wrong to have not charged Higgins.
One of the cyclists targeted by Higgins thanked the press, notably the Daily Mail, for its coverage of the attacks which he believes forced the police to take action.

























34 thoughts on “Thug who kicked cyclists off their bikes and shared footage of targeted attacks on Snapchat jailed for 18 months”
As well as being ashamed of
As well as deeply regretting his offences, he should also be ashamed of crying in court and asking for his mummy when sentenced.
Needs to work harder at being badass.
And going by the pic at the
And going by the pic at the top, it was wearing sandals or flip flops while riding the moped??
The poor boy. Maybe he’ll
The poor boy. Maybe he’ll find a nice cell mate to keep him company.
I suspect that the lad has
I suspect that the lad has received a longer sentence here as I can’t see his mates ever letting him (or anyone else) forget that he cried for his mum when sentenced and if anyone in his prison learns of that, he will be in for a difficult time. That may live with him for longer than the custodial part of his punishment.
Oh, poor baby assaulted
Oh, poor baby assaulted cyclists because he has ADD? Pull the other one, it’s got a moped horn on it.
“One of the cyclists targeted
“One of the cyclists targeted by Higgins thanked the press, notably the Daily Mail, for its coverage of the attacks which he believes forced the police to take action.”
Wait what? The DM actually helped cyclists??
Are pigs flying??
And with a sentence of just 18 months, I wonder how soon it will be let out and given the circumstances how soon it will offend again?
Will the sentence be addressed for being unduly lenient for what amounts to GBH if not potentially fatal?
The Daily Mail? I need to lie
The Daily Mail? I need to lie down…
mitsky wrote:
It’s a case of which Other is Otherer (or Otherest). The criminal driver has one of them there woke illnesses. We can be nasty to them. He had also covered his number plate and was wearing a balaclava, so he easily fits another stereotype the DM can exploit for its rage farming.
Somewhere there is an unused paragraph in the editor’s spare phrases file that says, “A neighbour said, ‘just imagine if it he had attacked real humans! It doesn’t bear thinking about.’ “
DM readers are probably being coached as we speak to have the same internal dissonance I felt when Jeremy Clarkson punched Piers Morgan.
mitsky wrote:
Black perpetrator from “Sadiq Khan’s Lawless London” vs a cyclist, they probably flipped a coin as to which way to go.
You can just picture the
You can just picture the editorial meeting, can’t you?
“So, gentlemen, do we at the Daily Heil back the young black man committing horrific acts of random violence against white people?”
“But boss. He’s attacking cyclists”.
“I know. It’s a tough one, isn’t it? Hold my calls, Miss Jenkins. We’re going to be a while on this”.
Editorial meeting: “How can
Editorial meeting: “How can we shoehorn a misogynistic, anti-taxation line on this?”
Disappointing that he will
Disappointing that he will actually only serve 9 months in jail. It would have been a great opportunity to make a real example of him, given the increasing frequency of these sorts of attacks.
With his own mother paralysed following a road accident, it beggars belief that he would inflict potentially life-changing injuries on others.
Great work by the Police for bringing the case, shocking that the CPS tried to stop it going to trial.
Alternatively the CPS
Alternatively the CPS realised a mistake had been made and, rather than double down on it as so many institutions do, something was done to remedy the situation. We can’t all be perfect…
the CPS realised a mistake
the CPS realised a mistake had been made and, rather than double down on it as so many institutions do…
This is rather too charitable! The CPS (or, rather, the unholy alliance between police and CPS) decided to ‘try it on’ and help the crim get away with seriously assaulting cyclists for their own discreditable reasons. The offenders (police and CPS) then realised that THEY weren’t going to get away with it.
John 8:7 or perhaps Matthew 7
You should consider acquainting yourself with John 8:7, Matthew 7:1-15 or perhaps Romans 2:1-3 (other equally valid faiths are available).
On consideration, I
On consideration, I unhesitatingly reject the suggestion
You do you…
You do you…
Sorry to disappoint you
Sorry to disappoint you further – he’ll only serve 40%.
In March, the case was
In March, the case was stopped by the CPS due to fears about a lack of evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction. However, a month later, this was reversed upon review, the Crown Prosecution Service deeming it wrong to have not charged Higgins
Cripes! Sherlock has joined the crack CPS Review Task Force and worked out that it was wrong to seize upon ‘lack of evidence’ as an excuse to send Higgins away without a stain on his character when there was already video posted online by the offender. All we need now is for him to be seconded to Lancashire Constabulary to study for months in a darkened room in order to discover that there are laws stating ‘down with this sort of thing!’
https://upride.cc/incident/kn13aus_knausmotorhome_doubleredlightpass/
https://upride.cc/incident/dp14fym_insignia_closepassdwlcross/
https://upride.cc/incident/nv07kws_clio_dwlcross/
https://upride.cc/incident/hd59opm_mercedese350_uwlcross/
https://upride.cc/incident/hk64pzt_audiq5_dwlcross/
https://upride.cc/incident/817ath_bmwi4_closepassuwlcross/
https://upride.cc/incident/n7blh_rangerover_closepassuwlcross/
I hope the victims sue him
I hope the victims sue him for damages also.
“The Standard(link is
“The Standard(link is external) reported how Higgins’ defence had claimed he was “vulnerable” and displayed a “lack of maturity” and had “mental health issues”
also: “people stereotype me because I wear a balaclava”.
Apparently this moron has two
Apparently this moron has two children. The sentence does seem light and the short ban from driving is a joke. Three year in prison and a ten year ban would be more fitting.
Plenty of people manage to
Plenty of people manage to have ADHD and not attack random strangers, myself included. ADHD is not mitigation.
There is a diagnosis of
There is a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.”
But he followed a cyclist for fifteen minutes? Surely anyone with that disorder would have lost interest after thirty seconds?
I’m no medical expert, but I’ve never heard of someone diagnosed with ADHD being more likely to attack total strangers because of their mode of transport.
He has also been disqualified from driving for two years and nine months.
Like most other driving bans, totally inadequate. I just can’t understand why, if you’ve used a vehicle to attack someone, the law doesn’t prevent you from attacking someone with a vehicle ever again. If you shot at someone, would you get your gun licence back after two years nine months? You’d never get it back, but hey, so few people are killed by vehicles compared to guns, it makes sense to treat drivers more leniently than gun owners..
“Davontay” Hmm
“Davontay” Hmm
dreamlx10 wrote:
Pretty cowardly to hide behind that weak ass hmm + emoji.
If you think you’ve got a point worth making, how about growing a pair and making it outright? I dare you.
“dreamlx10” Hmm
“dreamlx10” Hmm
“One of the cyclists targeted
“One of the cyclists targeted by Higgins thanked the press, notably the Daily Mail, for its coverage of the attacks which he believes forced the police to take action.”
The state of the UK; justice if the readership of the DM are outraged. What a world we live in now. 😕
He’ll have plenty of time to
What a silly little boy
leedorney wrote:
Yes…not the first, second or third (and I don’t suppose it’ll be the last) time you’ve posted this sort of filth, is it? Perhaps you need to ask yourself what it is you find so joyous about the prospect of someone being anally raped whilst incarcerated? Do you believe that it’s a sign of a civilised society that when people are undergoing condign judicial sanction they can’t be protected from sexual assault? If so I can’t really see what makes you any different to this moron.
Rendell with respects my
Rendell with respects my friend, I’ve never decided to kick someone from a cycle like a silly little boy, facts are facts Rendell, thats what happens in prison… because the anally depraved are exactly that, in primitive form, unlike you! Btw thank you for monitoring my posts, glad s.1’s noticing them NOT
You have however on many
You have however on many occasions made comments like a silly little boy scrawling obscenities on a lavatory wall. If you thought your comment was acceptable and reasonable why have you deleted it and replaced it with another? And who the hell are the “anally depraved”?
Rendel Harris wrote:
Maybe it’s a typo and it’s meant to be “anally deprived”? Of course, it may seem that most people are deprived if someone is full of arse themselves…
“Vulnerable” “mental health
“Vulnerable” “mental health issues”. “…a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.” Bottom line, if he was fit enough to ride he knew what he did was wrong. The fact that he posted these videos online shows that he had no remorse whatsoever. Think the fact that he “.. called for his mother in court” shows what he actually was; nothing but a spoiled mummy’s boy.