The much-criticised RideLondon event guide is back under scrutiny today after entrants noticed their official ride time will seemingly be paused during breaks at feed stops. It raises questions about 'moving time' vs total time, and whether riders can claim to have completed the event in a time minus how long they have spent at feed stations.
Guardian political correspondent Peter Walker spotted that under the 'Take a break' section, participants are told: "The Welfare Stops at Felsted School and Chipping Ongar High Street are great places to take an extended break — especially as your official event time will pause automatically while you're at these stops.
"So you can enjoy the facilities at your leisure, knowing that your time will restart once you hit the road again."
He suggested it would feel "slightly like posting a time on cheat mode", although "I suppose it's good in that it might encourage some people to take it a bit easy".
Others said the news was further proof of the event adopting a 'this is not a race' attitude, and follows on from this week's uproar and backpedalling over the 22mph safety car.
On Tuesday, London Marathon Events, the organiser of RideLondon, said information in the event guide stating there would be a safety car limiting pace to 22mph at the head of event was incorrect and had been an error.
> RideLondon safety car WON'T set 22mph speed limit — organisers admit race guide was "incorrect"
The statement came after four days of vocal criticism from participants who said the limit would, in fact, increase the danger of the ride, and should have been communicated before riders, who have easily averaged faster speeds on previous editions, had signed up expecting to do the same on this year's flatter Essex route.
It remains to be seen if RideLondon says pausing rider timing at feed stops is an error too, but it has already caused discussion online, with some suggesting the change will be a positive, while others think it detracts from the timed aspect of the event.
One disappointed rider asked if the "people at RideLondon had ever ridden a bike?" Another said they "could run a really fast marathon in 100m sprints".
"A big move to 'this is not a race'. It's a shame nobody told anyone who entered that at the time," one rider added.
However, another entrant argued it is a positive change and will "hopefully cut out the mamils averaging 30 km/h treating feed stops like Supermarket Sweep".
What do you think? Is it a big deal? Should the decision have been communicated to participants sooner? Will it change the way you ride the event? Let us know in the comments...
That would be a bit more credible if they hadn't gone all out to try and get Cav the record last year, wouldn't it?
Professional advice is always your gold standard. A GP referal is a good place to start but accessing those services can be difficult given the...
Why the hole? It's so you are forced to buy their special seatpost.
'that was "grippy" / a "grippy" stage' 'i love echelons' ... Adam Blythe
These would be ideal for security in the garage, and out and about for our bikes lost two in the past.
But if it doesn't look like a car's going to pull up, you find someone in the same-coloured top as you and make them give you their bike.
I bought an Anker 15w solar panel set to try for touring in Australia. It wasn't a success for me. I tried draping it over the rear panniers while...
I'm running a mid 90s chainset (originally had a 6 speed freewheel) with a 10 speed chain and cassette and it all works very well. I might be wrong...
Re: Early morning raid on BV....
Agreed on that, he was definitely part of my first week plans! Not to mention my French riders team - that is in tatters without Le Coq!