Progress on a long-awaited cycle route between Kenilworth and Leamington Spa could be halted after the Reform UK-run Warwickshire County Council announced it is conducting a county-wide review into whether cycle lanes are “actually worth it.”
The K2L scheme, a five-kilometre (3.1-mile) link along the A452, has been years in the making. Construction was initially expected in 2021 and 2022, but project management issues and the complexity of the route meant progress slowed. The first section, from Clarendon Avenue to the Kenilworth Road boundary, was finally completed in early 2024.
More than 3,000 residents had signed a petition calling for the cycle track to be included in the county’s plans, with £4.75 million in funding allocated for the route in December 2019. The most recent timescale given for completion was between 2027 and 2028.
However, Reform council leader George Finch suggested the scheme could be subject to review, the BBC reports.
“We will have to look at whether the review of the cycle lanes start there, whether we finish that project because the money is there or do reviews elsewhere – maybe in Weddington or other places across Warwickshire – to see whether cycle lanes are actually being used,” he told a press conference.
> Reform UK branded “utterly clueless” after pledging to scrap LTNs – where none exist
Finch also said the council would not be “crazily putting down cycle lanes” as it did not believe this was “best for the residents.” He claimed cycling schemes were unlikely to solve either congestion or climate change, which he described as a “crisis they seem to fathom up.”
“As an administration, we believe the addiction to cycle lanes doesn’t solve the crisis that they seem to fathom up, the climate change crisis,” Finch said. “What we do see is when it comes to congestion on roads, cycle lanes are not the most sensible option, which is why you have seen a change in the political sphere here.”
When asked to clarify whether K2L itself could be affected, Finch said that if “all had been ticked off then it is hard to repeal that,” but left open the possibility of re-examining the scheme.
The comments align with Reform UK’s stance on cycling and active travel, which has been a recurring theme for the party since its early years.

In May, Reform was ridiculed after it pledged to scrap Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) in the 10 councils where it had taken control following local elections — only for those councils to confirm that no LTNs existed in their areas.
The party’s chair Zia Yusuf had promised to enact a “large-scale reversal” of the traffic-calming schemes, which he described as policies “supported by and made to benefit more affluent people.”
A Liberal Democrat spokesperson accused Reform of being “utterly clueless about how to run a council,” while Conservative sources said the party was “pandering to the terminally online.”
Reform has also repeatedly singled out cycle lanes as a target. In April, Nigel Farage told BBC Breakfast that councils on the “verge of bankruptcy” were wasting “tens of millions” on “cycle lanes that no one uses,” accusing them of mismanaging money while basic services such as adult social care were under strain.
Farage has regularly made cycle lanes a political issue. In 2020, he rebranded his Brexit Party as Reform UK and pledged to stand candidates against councillors who backed new bike lanes and road closures. He wrote at the time that “for much of the day these new bike lanes with their endless lines of shiny white posts lie empty while traffic jams block what is left of the roads,” describing the schemes as “madness.”
The following year, he escalated his criticism by sharing a video of an ambulance stuck in gridlock beside a protected cycle lane in London, writing on Twitter: “This is totally insane. These cycle lanes are a joke.”






















30 thoughts on “Reform council leader halts bike lane plans and announces county-wide review to see if they’re “actually worth it””
“As an administration, we
“As an administration, we believe the addiction to cycle lanes doesn’t solve the crisis that they seem to fathom up, the climate change crisis,” Finch said.
I could have selected any quote from RefUK, but this, I think, is the winner. Apart from the rather strange language (addiction? fathom up? ) he doesn’t seem to appreciate that climate change is only a small part of the beneficial effect of cycle lanes, there’s; health, fitness, obesity, pollution, congestion, reducing road danger etc. But perhaps I’m being optimistic in expecting a RefUK councillor to either know or understand the facts.
“What we do see is when it comes to congestion on roads, cycle lanes are not the most sensible option, which is why you have seen a change in the political sphere here.”
Perhaps it’s expecting a bit much for a RefUK councillor to have much of a grip of anything other than the English flag of St George (ironically St George was from the middle east and probably so brown that RefUK would immediately deport him) but to be so ignorant of literally everything to do with transport that’s relevant should rule him out as having any responsibility for that area.
If this, complete ignorance of the facts and policy made on guesswork, is what is going to happen in RefUK councils, we are in for some very desperate times indeed.
perhaps I’m being optimistic
perhaps I’m being optimistic in expecting a RefUK councillor to either know or understand the facts
You’re missing the point! Their slavish adherence to the, admittedly ‘successful’ so far, tenets of Trumpism shows that it’s the concept of ‘facts’ which evades them
My reading is that the saint
My reading is that the saint was Greek with Roman ties, so catholic? Though orthodoxy big around there, and many early christian sects. Modern day turkiye,, but ethnic cleansing…
ktache wrote:
It really depends to whom you give ownership of the early Church: the great councils deciding on the nature of Christianity (Nicaea and so on) had yet to be held so there was no official schism in the church. Once the church was split into Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox both sides claimed to represent the one unified Catholic Church as established by Jesus and Peter, so Orthodox Christians would claim St George was one of them and those whose allegiance is to Rome would claim he was one of them. You pays your money and you takes your choice…
This isn’t what I came here
This isn’t what I came here for but I’m very glad it’s here!
But definitely not a pale,
But definitely not a pale, protestant englishman then.
And the dragon thing seems a bit far fetched…
ktache wrote:
Most certainly not. Not like what Jesus was, obviously.
Rendal, is that you on
Rendal, is that you on Sundays graun letters page?
How many Rendels do you think
How many Rendels do you think there are around the place?! Yes it’s me.
eburtthebike wrote:
I mean they’re right! The *most* sensible option – even just to improve things for cyclists – is not “cycle lanes”!
For that and congestion you need a program of providing attractive alternatives to driving combined with a reduction in driving convenience, especially for direct driving within urban areas.
And cycle *paths* … but even more a look at places at a *network* level then applying “unravelling of routes” for different modes, LTNs and modal filters. And finally secure cycle parking, separated cycle paths / more efficient junctions (grade separation / remote cycle detection loops and smarter light phasing) as needed.
But… perhaps that’s not what he meant?
Also on “but congestion”
Also on “but congestion” sounds like he really needs to have a read of the following – but alas I think he needs some years of (re-) education before he would even trouble to read it. Because actually it’s not even about efficient transport for them, is it?
https://robertweetman.wordpress.com/2020/04/16/where-is-the-best-place-for-congestion/
Excellent article, but he’s
Excellent article, but he’s unlikely to read it: it has polysyllabic words, and some quite long sentences.
It’s interesting, because we
It’s interesting, because we all understand what he means by ‘fathom up’ but it isn’t the standard meaning. I wonder whether it’s a local common usage?
As a local I am happy to
As a local I am happy to confirm that there’s only one person “fathoming up” ideas round here.
You will also notice that he’s good at saying what he doesn’t want… yet offers zero solutions.
So far he’s tried (and failed) to install a flag policy at the Council buildings as he told them to take down the Pride flag and he got told no, and given himself a hefty pay increase.
So yeah.. we feel well served by this loon who’s been drinking too much of Farage’s Kool Aid.
Anti-cycling’s gonna anti
Anti-cycling’s gonna anti-cycle. Come join us in the Tea Shop for more on Reform.
The WCC Cabinet has approved a Flags policy in recent days, although I hope that’s not the end of the matter.
They will, of course take all
They will, of course take all viewpoints into account – like hell they will!!! This is a sham! The decision has already been taken and they know it. It’s time to fight. If they get away with this it’ll be open season on all cycle lanes.
TBF didn’t they “rip out” all
TBF didn’t they “rip out” all the new LTNs that didn’t exist (thankfully overlooking all the nice quiet ones they and their supporters had been enjoying living in for decades)?
OTOH they probably “know one when we see one” with bike lanes… or rather it’s just back to the standard UK transport policy since the 1930s – “you know, that space could be used to widen the road for motorists…”
Councils are targeted by
Councils are targeted by government to increase active travel. The way that most councils are doing this is to install LTNs and cycle infrastructure. If Reform are not installing this infrastructure, Indeed even removing it, how are they going to meet their targets, and what is central government going to do about it?
Exactly as Chris Boardman
Exactly as Chris Boardman recounted in his story of his work in Manchester – something like “you’re spending x per year on your transport costs, there’s the health costs… Oh, and you’re not going to meet any of your decarbonisation targets … walking and cycling: your least shit option”
Of course Reform are going to try to have some national targets binned (eg. decarbonisation) and no doubt will argue that any they can’t ignore or fudge are in fact where the problem lies!
So “your town is a noisy, unpleasant place where it’s hard to get across the road or (drive) anywhere fast, with crumbling streets and no money to fix things etc. And that’s the fault of the mainstream parties who brought in all the bonkers regulations (and those immigrants)! It’s *because* you’re being ripped off over so-called green energy / ludicrous provision for non-existent cyclists (never mind ‘accessibility’ or ‘equality’) “.
Or just “they charge you for bike lanes, we won’t, that money stays in your pocket” – Trump style.
It’s a vote-winner, because we’ve an ageing population (older people tend to be more conservative small “c” and can favour the “it was better then” argument). Also good for the youth who may feel ignored (see all those old people who aren’t keen to accommodate them…)
He doesn’t believe active
He doesn’t believe active travel schemes can reduce congestion. So he wants more vehicles on the road, which will apparently reduce congestion.
Thick, stupid, pig-headed, racist, moronic backward inbred buffoons, all of them.
Reformed gammon – not good
Reformed gammon – not good for you, or anybody else
Yeah, for congestion and Co2
Yeah, for congestion and Co2 reduction you’d probably want LTNs and 15 minute towns as the first easy wins
Beyond that though, bike paths with even very light use still pay for themselevs 10x over if you include savings to the NHS, so as long as their methodology is good things will be clear……
You’re labouring under the
You’re labouring under the misapprehension that they want an honest answer to their dishonest question
Not so much, I’m seeing it
Not so much, I’m seeing it more as they’ll have to doctor the numbers in really obvious ways to get the answers squewed as far as they want
Just paint some flags on bike
Just paint some flags on bike lanes & he’ll soon shut up
Clem Fandango wrote:
Frankly, I spend most of my
Frankly, I spend most of my time trying to get past motorised congestion that a space-saver flag would be counter productive.
GMBasix wrote:
Spring-loaded mechanism operated by handlebar switch to swing inboard for tighter spaces, obviously…
General reports and info on
General reports and info on the benefits of cycling/good cycle lanes are already available, but they won’t match Reform’s views so will likely be ignored.
40 million vehicles on the
40 million vehicles on the road and they still think cycle lanes are a problem .