Lance Armstrong has admitted doping as early as the age of 21 and expressed fears that his drug-taking may have contributed to his testicular cancer in 1996.
The comments come as part of ESPN’s rather functionally titled two-part documentary, Lance, which will be broadcast on May 24.
News.com.au reports that when asked how old he was when he first doped, Armstrong replies, “probably 21.”
Strikingly, that would be before his world road race title in Oslo in 1993 after turning professional the previous season.
“My first professional season,” he says. “It was cortisone; drugs that stimulate your body’s own production of cortisone.”
Asked whether he feels he got cancer from doping, he replies: "You know, I don't know the answer to that.
"I don't want to say no, because I don't think that's right either. I don't know if it's yes or no, but I certainly wouldn't say no.
“The only thing I’ll tell you is the only time in my life I ever did growth hormone was the 1996 season.
“So in my head: growth, growing hormone and cells – if anything good needs to be grown, it does. But wouldn’t it also make sense if there is anything bad in there, it too would grow?”
Armstrong says he was however less concerned about possible negative effects of EPO.
"In many ways – and this is not going to be a popular answer – EPO is a safe drug," he says.
"Assuming certain things. Assuming [it is] taken properly, taken under the guidance of a medical professional, taken in conservative amounts – there are far worse things you can put in your body."
In 2018, Armstrong settled the long-running ‘whistleblower’ case originally initiated by his former US Postal Service team mate Floyd Landis, paying out a total of $111m in compensation and legal fees.
As you might imagine, he and Landis are not on speaking terms.
“Hey, it could be worse,” he says at one point in the ESPN film. “I could be Floyd Landis. Waking up a piece of shit every day. I don’t think it, I know it.”
Landis responds: “Everybody wanted to treat me like I was this evil, cheating liar. I told the truth and then I was a rat, turning on his own people. It was a no-win situation.
“I said this is what happened to everybody. Of course, it became about Lance because everything is always about Lance. That’s the way he wants it.
“He cannot pin that part on me. That’s his approach to life. It’s about ‘me’. When you’re that protected by the organisation that runs cycling, you can take out personal vendettas as well as win. He liked that. That was his thing.”
Speaking last year, Armstrong claimed he "wouldn't change a thing" about his doping.
“It was a mistake. It led to a lot of other mistakes. It led to the most colossal meltdown in the history of sports. But I learned a lot.”
Quite a lot of the problem seems to be police just can't be bothered, a while ago I was riding up the 30mph limit Finborough Road in Chelsea at...
Homogeneity of modes is good! One of the biggest failings in UK public space design* is not making separate spaces for cycling and walking (which...
Is that "left leaning types are meddlesome busybodies"?...
That 'boost' runtime is all but useless. Come on, 45 minutes autonomy....how many people do you know who go out for a 45 minutes trail ride?...
No. The jury found him guilty, the judge sentenced him,
I'd say this is only tangentially related to cycling – the fact that it happened to someone on a bike is just chance. It's more a policing story.
And less than a plurality of brain cells.
I've got a 2020 Scultura 7000e which cost £3,000 (slightly reduced) and came with Shimano Ultegra Di2. It's a fabulous bike - especially now with a...
The most common cause of fatal collisions in Norfolk in 2022 was loss of control (26%), closely followed by failing to look properly (21%).
Once again Rendel you miss the point spectacularly....