A Co. Cork motorist who narrowly avoided hitting a group of cycling police officers head-on has avoided a conviction, after a judge ruled that the incident failed to amount to careless driving, despite the driver pleading guilty to the charge.
41-year-old Denis O’Callaghan, who has eight previous convictions, including one for careless driving in 2006, was driving his BMW near Ahamilla, Clonakilty, Co. Cork on 17 September 2024, at 3.20pm, when he attempted to exit onto a minor road at a junction.
However, Clonakilty District Court heard this week that, as he entered the road, O’Callaghan failed to see a group of five Garda cyclists, who were undergoing mountain bike training at the time, approaching the junction.
O’Callaghan also failed to stop at the junction and narrowly missed the two officers riding at the front of the group, Echo Live reports.
Defence solicitor Colette McCarthy told the court this week that her client was pleading guilty to careless driving.
McCarthy described the junction where the near miss took place as a “difficult one” where the road “curved to one side”. She also said O’Callaghan drives on the road in question “all the time”.
The motorist claimed that he had “glanced up” as he took the turn, but admitted that he did not properly see the cycling police officers and had been “taken by surprise”.
The court was also told that O’Callaghan had no recent convictions, was working, and was the father of two children.
Striking out the prosecution, Judge Joanne Carroll concluded that, based on the evidence, she was not satisfied that the incident amounted to careless driving.
Instead, she argued that ‘driving without due care and attention’ was “probably a more accurate description” of O’Callaghan’s driving.
While O’Callaghan managed to escape punishment for almost hitting a group of police officers on bikes, he isn’t the only Irish driver to get off scot-free following an incident involving a cyclist in the past year – despite pleading guilty in court.
In October 2024, we reported that a Dublin taxi driver who pushed a cyclist during a confrontation sparked by the motorist’s “dangerous” close pass avoided a conviction for assault, after the judge concluded that the motorist might have been “a bit taken back” by the cyclist’s “bad language”.
Eamon Judge, a 52-year-old taxi driver from the Irish capital, said he felt intimidated by the cyclist, who called him “a p***k” and asked him “what the f*** are you doing?” after the motorist committed a dangerous close pass on him, forcing the rider to swerve out of the way.
While the judge threw out the assault charge, which the taxi driver had nonetheless admitted to, he did fine the 52-year-old €300 for careless driving.





















9 thoughts on “Driver who almost hit group of cycling police officers head-on after being “taken by surprise” avoids conviction”
Failure to see people making
Failure to see people making progress on the highway. If that’s not careless, we’re doomed.
Quote:
I very much doubt it was a
I very much doubt it was a Sudoku app on his phone causing the distraction …
The Irish judiciary do seem
The Irish judiciary do seem to be living in a different long ago time.
Very sad
Very sad
Shurely “Irish judge ignores
Shurely “Irish judge ignores everyone in court – including both prosecution AND defence – and instead makes up law to excuse bad driving”?
I’m not especially familiar
I’m not especially familiar with Irish road traffic legislation, but even so, I’m very confused by the judge’s comments.
The judge has stated that “driving without due care and attention” was an accurate description of Mr O’Callaghan’s driving.
The definition of careless driving (under the Road Traffic Act 1961 which appears to be the relevant legislation) is… driving “without due care and attention”.
So, if the judge thinks Mr O’Callaghan was driving without due care and attention, then that is the very definition of being guilty of careless driving. Isn’t it??
Given it’s previous
Given it’s previous convictions I’d love to know what it’s motor insurance £ is.
And as it admits to not seeing 5 police cyclists, presumably all wearing hi-viz as we’re so often advised to do, wouldn’t this mean it needs to go to specsavers…?
Or wasn’t wearing appropriate vision correction at the time…?
It’s obvious that that gang
It’s obvious that that gang of racing (police) cyclists were the problem! Were they 2 (or more) abreast? Or were they all in a line creating a passing hazard? Did any one of them not have a helmet — that alone causes ‘accidents’! Did they have lights on their bikes (doesn’t matter if it was day time)? Were they wearing appropriate hi-vis (clown) clothing when they came out of nowhere? Did any one of those fanatics ring their bell? We must eliminate these wild maniacs from OUR roads to make them safe! That poor driver didn’t have a chance!