A cyclist, who lost her leg when she was run over by a lorry driver, is calling for HGVs to be banned from the narrow and unsuitable stretch of road in Hertfordshire and redirected to the bypass.
Nicky Bull, 62, a highly experienced cyclist and triathlete who has competed in events across the globe, was hit by an articulated lorry driver on the A507 in Baldock, Hertfordshire in April 2022.
She told Cambridgeshire Live: “I do not recall the impact at all. But I understand that the HGV swung out to the right to turn left, and he hit me.
“I remember lying face down on the road and the wheels driving over my right arm and shoulder. I was counting them and there were six wheels. I remember thinking ‘he’s got to stop; he must feel me’.”
She was rushed to hospital and surgeons were forced to amputate her left leg below the hip. During the surgery, she had to be resuscitated four times, and then spent nine months in hospital.
Nicky hopes her experience will push authorities to act before more lives are lost.
“Losing my leg feels like a kind of death – the life I had before is gone. If anything good can come out of this, it would be to prevent someone else suffering the same fate,” she said.
“It is not suitable for HGVs at all – it is a very tight area with a 15th-century house on one side and a 17th-century building on the other, designed back in the days of the horse and carriage, so it’s clearly really unsuitable for huge lorries.”
Nicky is now campaigning for HGVs to be banned from using the A507 through Baldock and redirected to the bypass instead. Restrictions already apply to parts of the road, but she wants them extended to the dangerous junction where she was struck.
“There is very little difference in terms of time, but perhaps it is slightly shorter in distance, which is why drivers continue to use it.
“The driver who hit me said he used this route frequently, which is unbelievable really, that HGV drivers who know how very tight and difficult this junction is continue to travel this way.”
North Herts Council’s Growing Baldock Plan identified the need for a new road connection between the A507 and A505 by 2030, but Nicky has called for action sooner.
“While I understand there will be a cost to this, my NHS rehabilitation has cost hundreds of thousands of pounds to date, and as well as the cost, we are talking about people’s lives and wellbeing, which you just can’t put a price on. This is urgent and must be a priority for now,” she said to Slater and Gordon Lawyers.
She has the support of Chris Hinchliff MP for North East Hertfordshire, added: “The White Horse Crossroads has become a symbol of preventable tragedy.
“Nicky’s devastating injuries and the tragic death of Peter Day in 2018 are not isolated incidents – they are stark reminders of how dangerous this junction has become.
“I fully support Nicky’s campaign to ban lorries from travelling through the junction. It’s time we put lives before the convenience of freight companies and take bold, decisive action to make this area safe for everyone who uses it.”
Due to the injury, the former triathlete went through extensive rehabilitation.
“At first, I was terrified I’d never get outside again, but I worked as hard as I could at every opportunity. Swimming has been my salvation. The moment I got back into a hydrotherapy pool, I realised I could still do it,” she said.
Colette Shaw, Co-Founder of STEPS Prosthetics and Nicky’s Prosthetist, added: “Nicky sustained an extremely high trans-femoral amputation injury, which made her rehabilitation needs and prosthesis requirements complex.
“Her determination and tenacity demonstrated during her months of residential rehabilitation with us was remarkable, and no doubt she is bringing that same level of commitment to her campaign for change.”

12 thoughts on “Cyclist who lost her leg after being run over by lorry driver “trying to save a couple of minutes” calls for HGVs to be banned from “unsuitable” road – before “something worse happens””
No mention here or in the
No mention here or in the linked report of any sanction at all for the lorry driver?
I couldn’t find that either,
I couldn’t find that either, but in searching for it found this:
https://www.royston-crow.co.uk/news/21987579.cyclist-killed-serious-crash-involving-lorry-baldock-town-centre/
Literally the same month, in nearly the same place.
(No subject)
Something has to be done. We
Something has to be done. We need default liability and mandatory custodial sentences for drivers who cause death.
Or … how about we just don
Or … how about we just don’t mix large motor vehicles with vulnerable road users?
Sounds impossible / impractical, right? OTOH there are places which are implementing it.
Not sure what you mean by “default liability” but if you mean presumption of criminal guilt in motoring collisions I’m not aware of anywhere that has or is considering it (“presumed liability” only relates to civil / compensation matters).
Mandatory custodial sentences may sound good but as you can see in the UK the problem is often not at the punishment phase but in getting a conviction. (The judges, lawyers and jury all drive…) Or even getting to court in the first place (the police all drive also – likely any witnesses do too).
If you managed to get this into law (not forgetting politicians and voters all drive…) I think you’d see even more “not *caused* by the driver” verdicts.
…But few people cycle – so get prepared for prison time in the event that a child / elderly pedestrian suddenly steps in front of you when you’re cycling.
(I do think we might make more drivers take driving a *bit* more seriously – testing more than once a lifetime might set the tone? However I think achieving that in reality is a *hard* problem. One which will probably need a whole bunch of time-consuming and expensive changes also eg. alternatives to driving. )
But it’s not about motor
But it’s not about motor vehicles – large or small. It’s about the people driving them.
It’s both – it’s Driver x
It’s both – it’s Driver x Vehicle.
Unless you’re claiming that the same bad driver would present the same danger behind the wheel of a mobility scooter as they would driving an HGV, which would seem a rather implausible suggestion.
Surreyrider wrote:
Wot mdavidford sed.
Also see the PACTS “what kills most on the roads” report.
https://www.pacts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/PACTS-What-kills-most-on-the-roads-Report-15.0.pdf
Of course there are differences in who uses what vehicle types where and how. But you are in fact going to be dead more times in eg. a collision with a truck than a bike, for example, for several reasons…
Of course there are
Of course there are differences in who uses what vehicle types where and how
Yes – anybody driving a BMW or Audi is a self-centred nutter: high probability
I have kids going through the
I have kids going through the driving test at the moment, and from what they are telling me the “hazard perception” element of the theory test is not fit for purpose. One passed with a score of 66%, (meaning 34% of hazards were missed???).
The more I think about it, the more I realise that the driver training doesn’t seem to even attempt to instil a sense of responsibility on drivers towards other road users. If the hazard perception was updated to be “hazard and vulnerable road user perception” (different button for each) it would encourage observing all road users, and reacting to cyclists/ horses/ pedestrians under the “vulnerable” category, rather than being trained to ignore them until they do something unexpected.
But then what do I know, as an idiot cyclist who has only been driving motor vehicles for 38 years and still feels like they are learning.
SimoninSpalding wrote:
Two things – first not many people are actually *interested* in driving! They have no interest in the finer points of road safety, vehicle control, how the damn thing works. They just want to have independent mobility and fit in with everyone else.
I bet this applies to even more people as the experience becomes normal, then another chore. Even boy-racer types.
Yes – you can opt-in – and there are a few proud advanced driver types, or others who take an active interest in the process of driving / improving skills. But I’d bet the overwhelming majority simply do because (it has been fixed so) that’s how you get around.
Second – tying in with above – in practice learning driving / the driving test is effectively a “rite of passage”. Those who have made it what it is likely had good intentions and tried to make it produce safe and effective drivers. The fact is though that for most people it’s a once-per-lifetime way of joining the adult club, and we leave behind the initiation rituals as we’re quickly retrained by “how everyone drives in reality” every day in the roads. And how people practice it in their daily routines (driving while tired, driving with distractions, using it as a bit of time to think about other stuff…)
Yet another, of many, tossers
Yet another, of many, tossers on the road who can’t drive/navigate the roads and should retake a test!