A cyclist has appealed for information after a car passenger threw an egg at him, hitting him in the back, in an alleged “unprovoked assault” last week – which he says could have had “far worse consequences” if a less experienced cyclist had been targeted.
The incident, captured on the cyclist’s camera, attached to a neck strap, took place on Monday 16 June, at around 2.30pm on Ditton Lane, in the north-east of Cambridge, as the driver of a Land Rover Freelander passed the rider on the busy road heading into the city centre.
In the video, as the car passes, a passenger can be seen throwing an egg in the direction of the cyclist, the egg first striking him on the back before falling to the road and smashing.
The cyclist, who while wishing to remain anonymous goes by the username ‘al_eye_am’ or ‘Thank me for cycling’ on Twitter/X, can be heard in the video saying, “He threw something at me”.
And speaking to road.cc, the rider admitted that he “had no idea what had been thrown until I returned home and viewed the video”.
“I was mildly destabilised, but had the egg hit me on the back of the head, or had they hit a less skilled or experienced cyclist, then the assault could have had far worse consequences,” he says.
“Next time it might be someone else, and they might not stay upright, and end up under the car’s wheels.”
He continued: “I don’t suppose I was the only target for the day. It was entirely unprovoked, and I had not seen or interacted with the vehicle or occupants beforehand.”

Following the egg-throwing incident, the cyclist then caught up with the vehicle at a set of traffic lights, as its driver and passengers stare at him.
The cyclist then tells the car’s occupants: “Good move, you’re on a camera – well done”, prompting the egg-throwing passenger to wind down his window and reply, “What?” before the motorist drives off.
“I doubt that anyone carries one ‘fresh’ egg, more like six, 12, or even 48, depending on the source,” the cyclist says. “I hope my verbal interaction gave the offender pause for thought, and he did not throw any more as the car moved into the city.”
The cyclist then reported the incident to Cambridgeshire Constabulary, who told road.cc that they have attempted to identify the person who threw the egg, though no arrests have yet been made.
“The police have ‘filed’ the case pending identification of the driver, but how aggressive their search will be, I can’t say,” the cyclist continues.
“I verbally suggested to the police that they seek to identify the driver, as there is, in my opinion, a responsibility on the driver’s shoulders to prevent his passengers misbehaving, and they could theoretically ascertain the name of the offender,” he says.
“You will also see in the video what appears to be an unrestrained child standing in the rear passenger footwell.”

However, as noted by the rider, the vehicle’s tax expired on 6 May, calling into question the up-to-date nature of the car’s registration, and “whether the DVLA has been kept informed about its ownership” – making the police’s task tracking down the culprit somewhat trickier, he says.
“The digital evidence team of Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire. and Hertfordshire police, to whom I regularly submit journey camera footage of handheld phone usage and other offences, are very good, and usually advise that they will take ‘positive action’ against a road user I have reported,” he adds.
“The quality of cameras available has much to do with this – with the advent of 360° journey cameras there are few hiding places for offending drivers – and so the footage obtained is routinely clear and indisputable.”
> Car passenger fined for lobbing tub of hair gel at cyclist from moving vehicle
Not that some social media users found this latest egg-related incident clear and indisputable, however.
An edited version of the above video, posted on X this week by the cyclist, has been viewed over 20,000 times, attracting dozens of comments.
And while many were shocked by the passenger’s actions, with one user describing him as a “nasty idiot” and “totally out of order”, others were scathingly critical of the cyclist’s decision to report the matter to the police, along with – bizarrely – his positioning on the road when the alleged assault took place.
“Surely the police have much more pressing issues than an egg being thrown,” wrote Ollie. “They’d be absolutely drowning in calls on Halloween if this is what they have to deal with.”
“My bad,” the cyclist replied. “If the police are reading this, they can ignore all reports of assault, and if an egg hits a moving cyclist on the back of the head and knocks him or her into traffic on the next occasion, they can say ‘That’s okay, as Ollie says so’.”
“This was a regular past time as kids in the 70s! We would get drop them from a pedestrian bridge! Now it’s a police matter?” added Paul, prompting the rider to respond: “Assault always was”.

“Like the non-incident close passes cyclists whinge about, nothing happened here either,” said another.
“Looks like you attract attention on purpose by cycling in the middle of the road like a twat.”
The cyclist again responded by showing the Twitter user – who later reverted to claiming he was riding in the middle of the ‘lane’ – a still from his video, showing him clearly riding close to the kerb and hedge.
“Then silence!” the cyclist told road.cc.
> Cyclist seriously injured by car passenger who pushed rider off bike
Reflecting on his decision to report the incident to the police, despite the criticism of some pro-motoring accounts on Twitter, he said: “I do not want this happening to another cyclist or pedestrian, especially without consequences.”
When approached for comment by road.cc, a spokesperson for Cambridgeshire Constabulary said that anyone with information related to the identity of the egg-throwing passenger should contact the police through its website, using reference 35/44509/25, or by calling 101.
“We were contacted on 16 June with reports a man was struck with an egg whilst cycling on Ditton Lane, Cambridge,” the spokesperson said.
“The egg was thrown by a passenger of a Land Rover Freelander at about 2.30pm. Attempts have been made to identify the person who throw the egg, but no arrests have been made.”




-1024x680.jpg)


















33 thoughts on “Cyclist pelted with egg by passing car passenger in “unprovoked assault” – but gets accused of “riding in the middle of the road” on social media”
Bearing in mind that West
Bearing in mind that West Yorkshire police have blamed me for being the victim of a close pass because I wasn’t “correctly” positioned in the middle of the cycle lane, I’m sure that the inability of the police to do anything about this incident is at least in part due to victim blaming.
Just imagine their response
Just imagine their response if it was a McDonald’s milkshake
Or something thicker – I’d
Or something thicker – I’d expect a (mc)flurry of complaints.
Just imagine the BTL
Just imagine the BTL commentors if a cyclist chucked an egg at their car. I’m 100% certain they’d be laughing it off as a non incident.
Clem Fandango wrote:
PSA: I feel this post needs an alert placed on it for the benefit of anyone who may read it if sarcasm is on their first language. Just to be clear (and straight up) the said BTL commenters would be calling on the police to arrest “the absolute scum” that did this and probably threatening deadly revenge.
Viewers in Scotland have their own programmes.
David9694 wrote:
They do that if someone touches their car.
Memories of a full beer can
Memories of a full beer can being thrown at me totally unprovoked from an oncoming vehicle early on a Sunday morning (I know it was full because it exploded when it hit the ground behind me). Police attitude was that it’s just someone playing silly buggers and not even worth reporting. I pointed out that a full can of beer weighs nearly half a kilo and we had a closing speed of something approaching 40 mph, so more than enough to kill, the response was a shrug (this was way before cameras, I reported it at the police station) and “If it had hit you we could do something but as it is we’ve only got your word for it that they were throwing it at you…” Hopefully they’ve improved since then but I hae me doots…
Sounds like a Stella effort
Sounds like a Stella effort there.
(Have also had a can checked at me IRL on bike – but I don’t think the yoof round here would waste even cheap beer on a cyclist…)
It was about the time that
Beer or Kronenburg? One or
Beer or Kronenburg? One or the other…
Sounds like someone gave you
Sounds like someone gave you a Broadside…
10 out of 10 for calmly
Of course the cyclist in this incident has done nothing wrong. In fact, I’d give him a perfect score, with one small exception:
If Police Scotland are
If Police Scotland are anything to go by, unless someone IDs the egg-throwing cockwomble, absolutely nothing will come of this.
Apparently, and this is according to PS … there is no obligation on the driver to name the passengers or provide any information on them.
Our guy was hit by a 2lt bottle with fluid in.
I was hit in the face by a
I was hit in the face by a flying can of coke years ago.
I stopped, picked up the can and carried on.
When I caught up with the car at the traffic lights I then shook the dregs of the coke over the driver’s head through the open sun roof then lobbed the can at him and made a very hasty retreat.
FFS
FFS
“When approached for comment by road.cc, a spokesperson for Cambridgeshire Constabulary said that anyone with information related to the identity of the egg-throwing passenger…”
Oi! Cambridgeshire Constabulary!
How about tracing the driver of the vehicle, registration clearly seen in the clip, and asking THEM?!
The VED has expired some time ago so this is also worth checking on.
(The MOT is also due soon, so it might be worth keeping an eye on that to see if it gets done.)
If it has been sold, and the current owner is untraceable… ask the previous owner.
If they refuse, investigate further as there is probably something else going on with all the parties.
It really is not rocket science nor should it even be that hard.
If you cared enough.
Then you find out it’s owned
Then you find out it’s owned by a shell company
Let’s not ova-do the puns –
Let’s not ova-do the puns – this is no yolking matter.
mdavidford wrote:
You’re cracking me up now, feeling quite scrambled.
Rendel Harris wrote:
um… let it go
mdavidford wrote:
Nice start – then a poor follow-up.
I’ll boo men who resort to poorly laid punchlines.
GMBasix wrote:
If you didn’t like that one, this will make you even meringuery.
So much so I’ll be taken into
So much so I’ll be taken into custardy
mdavidford wrote:
OK guys, that’s un ouef.
eburtthebike wrote:
You’ve poached that from somewhere else.
IMHO Rider should ask the
IMHO Rider should ask the police for drivers insurance details and file a claim against the drivers insurance.
Seriously. Put in a claim to them for cleaning clothing + the bike; say £15…
While they might reject it on the basis that you will never take it to court, that doesn’t stop you from claiming (And putting a few £100 on the drivers insurance due to open claim…)
(No idea if you could take it to small claims and recover the £35 fee given fee recovery is limited for insurance claims (though I think you can…))
(Police will go to driver who will refuse to say who passenger was, then give up because they can’t identify the passenger; At least the insurance claim will result in penalty for them).
Yes, they could do this, but
Yes, they could do this, but it’s the DVLA you need to ask for the vehicle owner’s details, not the police…
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/v888-request-by-an-individual-for-information-about-a-vehicle
Or ask mib
Or ask mib
https://www.mib.org.uk/check-insurance-details/check-a-vehicle-not-at-the-roadside-after-an-accident/
Accident/ incident all the same !
I like the idea, except
I like the idea, except (eggcept) is it a good idea when the video shows it missed and therefore it would be a fraudulent claim. Couldn’t they claim for distress or similar instead?
The cyclist has the nerves of
The cyclist has the nerves of steel, I don’t know if I could be that calm, even though I should.
I will congratulate him for his calmness, I hope he uses any legal way to hunt down this asshole.
“Paul” wrote:
Yeah, woke health and safety gone mad, it is! Countless times I dropped eggs on cars from the bridge. And when they went to wipe the windows and smeared the egg across their vision, it caused a few pile-ups. Only a few dead each time, though, and none of us. How we used to laugh.
From my working at height
From my working at height training (I see a lot of persons mentioning having beer tins thrown a them) a 500g object dropped from 16m can be leathal on impact (regardless of having a hard hat on), its estimated speed at that point would be around 40mph, if I had a tin thrown at me I would report it as attempted manslaughter, they will plead out to get a lower charge, and it may acually make it to court. The risk is mainly in the impact breaking your neck, but when do the cops ever give you all the info anyway, just tell them enough to get a few points higher on the monthly charge league table and they will go with it imo.
It takes a special type of
It takes a special type of sad cunt to drive around with an egg so you can make a premeditated attack on a cyclist.
Isn’t it odd, the difference
Isn’t it odd, the difference in the way the police treat the victims of attacks with foodstuffs. If you’re a cyclist, no action, but if you’re a leader of a far right party and have a milkshake thrown at you, prosecution.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5ywp7lgwvro