A man who tracked down his stolen bike to a garden piled high with bicycles was struck on the head with a wheel by the prolific thief, who has now avoided jail despite a judge describing the assault as “serious” and condemning the failure of police to intervene.
Martin Shaba, 57, was handed a 12-month suspended sentence at Oxford Crown Court last week after attacking cyclist Oliver Goldstein at his home in Giles Road, Littlemore. He was convicted in April of inflicting grievous bodily harm without intent, as well as handling stolen goods, reports Leicestershire Live.
Shaba had refused to return the stolen bike, and CCTV footage showed him hitting Goldstein with a bicycle wheel as the cyclist attempted to retrieve it from the garden — a yard so full of bikes that some were visible over the top of the fence.
Judge Hassan Khan told Shaba: “On December 8, 2022, Mr Goldstein’s bike was stolen. On December 16, he tracked his bike to your address. He called the police but they didn’t attend. It’s disappointing the police didn’t act sooner.
“Mr Goldstein saw hundreds of bikes in the garden. He asked for his back and you told him to leave. He was then hit on the head by you when he was trying to retrieve his bike. It was a serious incident. CCTV shows you using a bike to hit Mr Goldstein’s head. He was lucky he didn’t suffer a more serious injury.
“Your actions were serious. You suggested you did nothing wrong, but that is quite the opposite. If you come back here, I will have little hesitation to activate the 12-month sentence.”
In his victim impact statement, Mr Goldstein said: “This led to me being assaulted. One is always cautious that one’s bike will be stolen again. I’m worried I will see him again.
“I have been worried about what would happen when walking around Oxford. I felt the family of the defendant was trying to intimidate me.” He also explained that his injuries had caused a hearing condition, which led to medical episodes “multiple times per week”.
In addition to the suspended sentence, he was ordered to complete 200 hours of unpaid work within 12 months, wear a trail monitoring device for three months, complete 12 rehabilitation activity days, and pay £200 in compensation and £1,000 in costs.
The attack took place less than a year after Shaba’s address was previously searched by Thames Valley Police.
In March 2022, officers executed a warrant at the same home and arrested a then 54-year-old man on suspicion of handling stolen goods and possession of criminal property. Police said they had recovered “a large number of bicycles,” and appealed for potential victims to come forward. At the time, road.cc reported the raid in Littlemore, and though the suspect was not named, it is now understood to be Shaba.

Oxford has one of the highest rates of bicycle theft in the country. According to analysis published in November using data from the Office for National Statistics, the city saw 1,198 bikes reported stolen in 2023 — a rate of seven thefts per 1,000 people, placing it second only to Cambridge nationwide.
The case has reignited concerns about the scale of bike theft in the UK and the risks facing cyclists who attempt to recover their stolen property.
One of the most serious recent incidents occurred in Hartlepool, where a cyclist who tracked down his stolen bike on social media was shot in the abdomen by a drug dealer during a confrontation in January.
Two months ago, 21-year-old Luis Fonseca was sentenced to over five years in a Young Offenders’ Institution after firing the “warning shot” before shooting the victim, who required surgery for life-threatening injuries.
Meanwhile, in February, there was a violent attack in London’s Regent’s Park in which a cyclist was threatened with a hammer by moped-riding thieves during an early morning ride. And in March, a man in York was chased and assaulted by youths who had taken his bike; he was ultimately able to retrieve it with the help of a passerby.
According to a Liberal Democrat analysis published in late 2024, 89 per cent of bike thefts reported to police since 2019 have gone unsolved. Just two per cent resulted in a charge — a figure the party described as evidence that bicycle theft had been “effectively decriminalised”.
Cycling UK’s director of external affairs, Sarah McGonagle, has previously warned that the “huge social impact” of bike theft, often viewed as a petty crime, can serve as a serious deterrent to cycling. “It’s one of the key factors putting many people off cycling altogether,” she said.




















20 thoughts on “Cyclist hit with wheel after spotting his stolen bike in prolific thief’s backyard — but attacker avoids jail”
Shouldn’t the line be: “… a
Shouldn’t the line be: “… a yard so full of STOLEN bikes that some were visible over the top of the fence.”?
Unless there was a valid reason for them all to be there…
So many questions from this:
So many questions from this:
1. How come it has taken until mid 2025 for an incident in 2022 to get to court?
2. How on earth does someone found guilty of assault, and (presumably, as the article doesn’t specifically mention what the sentence was for) handling stolen goods, as well as a previous conviction for handling NOT get a custodial sentence?
3. What use are the police?
I have had one positive
I have had one positive experience with the police, when I spotted my stolen bike on Gumtree. After zero interest by Stratford BTP and Walthamstow Met a an officer from Plaistow got involved. He retrieved the bike and several others after seeing my report.
All my other dealings had been abysmal. Most recently the Leyton police could not watch CCTV of my bike being stolen because I did not have a precise time. Fast-forwarding and rewinding clearly beyond their E10 skill set. Oh, and I was not allowed to watch the footage myself due to privacy concerns.
Not sure if the police are inadequate, disinterested, incompetent or what, but it needs addressing.
It would take less than 5
It would take less than 5 minutes to find the segment showing the theft.
It would take less than 5
It would take less than 5 minutes to find the segment showing the theft
That’s 5 minutes that these hard-pressed hard-working officers just don’t have! The first thing trainees practice parrotting at police college these days is not ‘Hello, hello, hello- what’s going on ‘ere then?’, but ‘we don’t have the resources, we don’t have the resources, we don’t…’. Worse still, you know that if you do, for some reason, have the exact time but the time is incorrect on the CCTV, they would simply say ‘alleged incident not shown on CCTV’. I have the ‘exact’* time on my phone-driver videos, but they still don’t bother
* exact, except the Hero 7 Black doesn’t display seconds, but the GPS locked time is within 1 second of phone network time and Rugby Time Signal time when the minute changes
No it doesn’t. It takes hours
No it doesn’t. It takes hours to trawl through CcTv. I’m not excusing it, but unless thee is a precise time it can take a long time to look through the CCTV
Rome73 wrote:
It can – but “it depends”? For a short “incident” (as in the article) or where the stolen item isn’t “covered” by CCTV so would only appear when it was taken into an area or removed it might take a lot of searching if the time of event is unknown.
However in the post Bill H made and assuming their bike was visible on CCTV (assumption – but they did mention fast forward / rewind) surely a simple binary search process would quickly get to the incident? So a precise time wouldn’t be needed initially.
It would have taken hours
It would have taken hours back in the 80s when we relied on magnetic tape to record footage.
But we’ve moved on. You simply halve the video each time. For example, if you have 60 minutes of CCTV footage and you’re trying to find the moment a bike goes missing, jump to the 30 minute mark, if the bike is still there, you only need to search the final 30 minutes. Then jump to 45 minutes, and so on. It’s not rocket science.
It’s not rocket science
It’s not rocket science
But it does require the slightest interest from the police in doing the job- that is what is conspicuously absent.
You’re seriously asking them
You’re seriously asking them to do maths?
Rome73 wrote:
I am always amazed that there are people who work in a field requiring knowing how to search through a long ordered list (effectively) and find some point where a state changed (e.g. a bike goes missing in CCTV video) who somehow are ignorant of the binary search algorithm. I mean, it’s only been known for at least millenia.
How is it possible to that ignorant?
Paul J wrote:
Because there’s zero pressure to solve that kind of crime? “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” Or “good reasons” can always be found for not doing something we don’t want to do.
Not sure if the police are
Not sure if the police are inadequate, disinterested, incompetent or what
All of those, just for a start. This is DG07 TMO– first reported for No MOT/ Failed MOT for serious defects on 18.7.25. There are a couple of vehicles around Garstang without VED for 10 and 7 years respectively- DVLA isn’t interested in those either and useless Minister Lilian Greenwood just replies with the obviously untrue tripe: ‘there is a robust enforcement regime making VED easy to pay but hard to avoid’ . Reports to Lancashire Constabulary are just closed immediately by un-named officers, including the one about this Vito- you will notice that at least 2 of the 3 occupants are not wearing seatbelts
CygnusX1 wrote:
4. Why is this incident in Oxford, dealt with in Oxford Crown Court, being reported in Leicestershire Live? 🤔
Because the 10-year-old
Because the 10-year-old ‘journalist’ writing the story thinks Leicester is on the outskirts of Oxford?
Leicestershire Live scrape
Leicestershire Live scrape articles from other newspapers for advertising revenue.
Mr Goldstein should have rang
Mr Goldstein should have rang the police telling about the stolen bikes etc, but adding that he had an argument with Shaba, who may be injured. When the police arrived in a flurry of blues and twos, Mr Goldstein should then have mentioned that he noticed Shaba had a slight limp when he brandished the bike wheel, possibly owing to a slight Achilles tendon or a plantar fascia injury.
Let me get this right:
Let me get this right:
– In March 2022, police confiscated stolen bikes from the thief.
– In December 2022, the thief once again had hundreds of stolen bikes (presumably he’d also sold on many) and was free to assault a member of the public.
What on earth is going on here? How was he not already in prison? Why is he not going to prison?
Because he is the real victim
Because he is the real victim, don’t you know? Not the scumbag cyclist…
… statment released by the police officers handling the case.
The bikes are just about
The bikes are just about visible on Google maps and someone ( I don’t know when) has dropped a pin and labelled it as ” Great Bike Mountain “