Labour MP and former Minister for Sport Kate Hoey, who once launched a diatribe in a national newspaper against cyclists she described as “law-breaking Lycra Louts,” has been fined £240 – for illegally driving her car through a traffic signal while it was red.
Hoey, an MP since 1989, was stopped by police after driving her Mini through the red light on London’s Victoria Embankment on 3 July this year, reports BikeBiz.
The 67-year-old pleaded guilty by post to City of London Magistrates’ Court, which imposed the fine.
In a 2003 article for the Mail on Sunday, Hoey claimed that “The real menance on Britain's roads are selfish, aggressive, law-breaking and infuriatingly smug Lyrca Louts."
The original article no longer appears to be available on the Mail Online website, although it is referred to here.
According to a post at the time on the website CycleBanter.com, Hoey went on to say: "Lycra louts don't just break the law; they often do so in an aggressive and threatening manner.
"How many times have you seen a cyclist deliberately riding in the middle of the road, preventing any car passing and then screaming abuse at the poor driver who dares to try?
"Another trick of theirs is to slip through on the inside just as you try turning left, or flying by so near that they knock against the wing mirror."
The Belfast-born MP’s tirade was apparently triggered on an RAC survey that claimed that 50 per cent of cyclists in London ignored red lights.
A Traffic Note published in 2007 by Transport for London’s Road Network Performance & Research Team following observation of 7,502 cyclists at five locations in London found that 16 per cent ignored traffic signals – but 84 per cent obeyed them.
An opponent of the hunting ban introduced by her party when it was in power, Hoey, who is MP for distinctly non-rural Vauxhall in inner London, is chair of the pro-hunting Countryside Alliance, which has its offices in her constituency.




















43 thoughts on “MP who called cyclists “law-breaking Lycra Louts” fined for driving through red light”
I agree with her comments
I agree with her comments regarding lawless cyclist but ha ha got yah hypocrit. Pay the fine then go to the NON-TAX paying STARBUCKS to eat some HUMBLE PIE.
Re: Guyz2010
It’s pretty
Re: Guyz2010
It’s pretty obvious from her comments, especially the language used, that her problem isn’t lawless cyclists but cyclists in general.
She’s no different from any other minority hating narrow minded idiot.
Guyz2010 wrote:I agree with
Always one perhaps…
Probably claim the fine back
Probably claim the fine back on expenses??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX7wtNOkuHo
what a twat ….
what a twat ….
Karbon Kev wrote:what a twat
Whats a TWAT?
Oh dear. How to comment on
Oh dear. How to comment on this without appearing to be a smug lyrca lout? Damn, too late I fear!
As Nelson of The Simpsons would say, “Ha Ha!”
Now call me old fashioned,
Now call me old fashioned, but I am of the opinion that any person in a position of authority should be held at a higher level or responsibility that the rest of the population, think of the corrupt Police Officer, or the pyromaniac Fireman, if they are found to be breaking the law, then the penalty or punishment should be greater than for the general population. This is just my opinion, agree with me or not, I don’t mind. This, in my opinion should also extend to our Elected Officials as well, especially when this official uses a national publication as a platform for a political agenda.
Now, what she is saying has some truth to it, there are cyclist that do break the law and as far as I am concerned, they should be held accountable for there actions. However what rely did amuse me was that this person, after using the anti cyclist, lycra lout platform, was this year caught running a red light, and according to the court report, the light was red for over 1 second before she went through. Now whats really annoying is that whilst the maximum penalty for this offence is £1000 and 6 points, she was fined £240, the report does not mention points.
http://jasontimothyjones.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/labour-mp-who-called-cyclists-the-real-menace-on-our-roads-found-guilty-of-running-a-red/
jason.timothy.jones
I imagine that the penalty depends on the plea, she pleaded guilty therefore the punishment won’t be as severe as otherwise?
Hoey is to my great
Hoey is to my great misfortune my MP. She is considered a joke by many of her own party members and the only reason she is still in parliament is because her seat is so safe.
Shame she wasn’t drunk in charge then we could of got shot of her.
belgravedave wrote:Hoey is to
She is my MP as well, fellow Lambethian!
All I can say is Brian Paddick’s not wrong
[removed – weird double
[removed – weird double posting]
TBH I see more cars running
TBH I see more cars running red lights than cyclists.
How about getting some cameras up to charge stupid tax at every junction?
I would love to see more red
I would love to see more red light cameras in this country (are there any?).
jacknorell wrote:I would love
I think so, as I’m sure I’ve seen signs for “Red Light Cameras” which is a great double entendre.
The origonal Mail on Sunday
The origonal Mail on Sunday article is at the bottom of this blog http://jasontimothyjones.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/labour-mp-who-called-c…
Using her logic, all Mini
Using her logic, all Mini drivers are wanton and selfish red light jumpers, who pay far less road tax than law abiding Jaguar drivers.
Just love imagining that ‘egg
Just love imagining that ‘egg on face perplexed look’.
Funny, last time there was an
Funny, last time there was an article about some UKIP politician saying anti cyclist things, everyone was lining up to slag off UKIP. Yet when a Labour politician says similar things, the focus is on the individual rather than the party she stands for. 😕
That’s because anti-cycling
That’s because anti-cycling nonsense is written into UKIP’s manifestos. It is what passes for policy with them. That’s not the case with Labour. UKIP are an institutionally anti-cyclist party (with the occasional pro-cyclist rebel) whislt Labour are largely neutral with substantial pro and anti cyclist sections.
“…institutionally
“…institutionally anti-cyclist…”
I love that turn of phrase :))
Pot…….Kettle?
Pot…….Kettle? 😉
240 pounds isn’t a very large
240 pounds isn’t a very large fine given the likelihood of someone being the killed or badly hurt.
I also can’t bear cyclists going through red lights either. The problem is one of too few traffic traffic police, no one expects to get caught, solve that and there would be a whole lot less us and them attitude.
To be fair, she might have
To be fair, she might have been wearing lyrcra at the same time, and certainly as an MP is infuriatingly smug. Red light jumping is agressive and selfish so it ticks all the boxes…
Kate Hoey in Lycra, what a
Kate Hoey in Lycra, what a horrible thought. You really need some therapy to think that!!
freespirit1 wrote:Kate Hoey
I just had a little vomit come up
She should be sacked and her
She should be sacked and her pension withdrawn.
Wow…so this article has
Wow…so this article has been eating away at the cycling community for 10 years and now she has a transgression it’s triumphantly dug up and used as ammunition.
Karma is a bitch.
As Oscar Wilde allegedly said
As Oscar Wilde allegedly said about the death of Little Nell: it would take a heart of stone not to laugh =))
Theobald’s Road WC1 this
Theobald’s Road WC1 this morning: police pulled over a RLJ cyclist. Good – quite right too. While giving him a ticket, they ignored the bus taking up the entire ASL box.
The only surprise about this story is that the Police actually enforced road traffic laws against the driver of a motor vehicle instead of a cyclist.
Driving last night on a very
Driving last night on a very busy road in South Glos I was amazed at the number of cyclists – assumed commuting at that time of night – without lights on parts of the road with poor street lighting, do they have a death wish?
You can buy perfectly good lights for £1 at the pound shop.
Surely if they were more than
Surely if they were more than £1 Trading Standards would get involved?
“How many times have you seen
“How many times have you seen a cyclist deliberately riding in the middle of the road, preventing any car passing and then screaming abuse at the poor driver who dares to try?”
Let’s see now, erm….oh yes, NEVER. Not once in my long life. I wouldn’t be surprised if she hasn’t either.
And while I’m at it, ‘Lycra louts’ is just another silly, catchy sound bite, designed to grab attention and sound like it actually means something. Typical Daily or Sunday Mail sound-bite-sneering, devoid of any thought whatsoever. The people you do see jumping lights and doing other daft things are rarely, in my experience, ‘lycra-clad’, i.e. serious proper cyclists like you and me.
RLJing combines two things
RLJing combines two things most people hate…arrogance (‘the law doesn’t apply to me’) and queue jumping.
Funny another example of
Funny another example of claiming another group is the issue when it is actually the person pointing the finger.
Just goes to show that when
Just goes to show that when you point your finger at somebody there are three (Norfolk excepting) pointing back at yourself.
As said earlier KARMA
Er, no….more often they’re
Er, no….more often they’re Denim-Louts. But Hoey, full of vitriol, sees only what she wants to see….as do all bigots.
P.R.
Why we need stronger
Why we need stronger sentences for ‘minor motoring offences: http://sickandtiredtothebackteeth.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/why-we-need-stronger-sentences-for.html?showComment=1383299217088
From the article
“How many
From the article
“How many times have you seen a cyclist deliberately riding in the middle of the road, preventing any car passing and then screaming abuse at the poor driver who dares to try?”
I have to say I have seen this in the UK and people riding in a group of 5 or 6 strung across the road filling the lane on a busy route.
It is madness people, remember the laws of:-
1 The road.
and
2 Gross tonnage
1 The road, I know we are allowed to cycle two abreast but just to wind somebody up on a narrow road get a life or more aptly applying rule 2 gross tonnage, keep the one you have.
We are all road users.
I know, I know, a lot of car users (cannot say drivers cause a lot of people cannot drive their cars adeptly) are septic ar$eholes but does that mean we have to be as well?
Mind you I’m lucky I do most (well all) of my cycling in France and have had no problems to date except from one UK driver and he may just have not appreciated the insane priority to the right rule over here (see no where’s perfect). As in this article what goes around comes around or more succinctly Karma
So funny. I lived in London
So funny. I lived in London during the height of the Blair years (97 – 05) and always found Hoey to be a vacuous piece of detritus. Strangely enough I kind of liked Blair . . . moving right along . . .
Poor old kate must be doubly
Poor old kate must be doubly pissed off because not only did she earn a traffic conviction and the ridicule of the cycling world but the fox she was speeding to run over at the time got away when the police stopped her as well
Kate Hoey representing part
Kate Hoey representing part of Lambeth (an entirely urban area with a significant level of gun crime, no fox hunting, and a somewhat higher-than-average proportion of utility-cyclists) has to be one of the most mismatched MP-constituency pairings ever.
Her pet causes seem to be: Northern Irish Protestants, supporting farmers and country people generally, supporting fox-hunting, supporting the right to own guns, banging on about sport, and expressing pig-ignorant bigotry towards cyclists.
Regardless of whether one agrees with any of those (I range from strongly disagreeing to just not caring either way), who decided she was a good match for this particular parliamentary seat?