British Cycling has confirmed the riders who will represent the country in the team time trial mixed relay at the UCI Road Cycling World Championships in Yorkshire later this month.
The format, which made its debut at the European Championships last month with hosts the Netherlands emerging as winners, is contested by teams comprising three men and three women, with John Archibald, Dan Bigham and Harry Tanfield joined by Lauren Dolan, Anna Henderson and Joss Lowden in the Great Britain team announced today.
The three men will set off first for one lap of the 14km Harrogate Circuit, with the women starting when the second of their male team-mates crosses the finish line. The final team time will be taken when the second woman finishes, with the fastest team winning.
Great Britain Cycling Team Performance Director Stephen Park said: “The team time trial mixed relay is certainly going to be an exciting event, not least because it will be the first time it’s been held at a world championship level.
“I have a lot of admiration for John, Dan and Harry for the success they have achieved independently of British Cycling and the mark they have made on the cycling world.
“I believe those three riders will set us up for a strong first lap, before handing over to the women’s team to pick up the metaphorical baton. Lauren, Anna and Joss all possess strong climbing abilities which will be crucial on this course, and riding at this level will play a big part in their development, particularly in Lauren and Anna’s case as under-23 riders.”
He added: “With just under two weeks to go now until the road worlds, preparations are being finalised across the squads, and we are looking forward to announcing squads for the other races over the coming days.”
Add new comment
16 comments
I’d be most happy if they change their name to “America corporate fitness giants are a bunch of c*nts”
I'm not sure what I think about the Deliveroo judgement.
I never actually believed that a kid on a MTB could deliver to a fleeing bank robber or to the ISS - I'd assumed it's what used to be called "artistic licence" - so I wouldn't have taken on face value that they could deliver "anywhere"...
I mean - Domino's don't deliver to my village even though there's a branch in the next town 4 miles away, so I wouldn't imagine Deliveroo would either.
Dont assume anything with advertising... Red Bull lost a case based on someone who said that he was not given wings as promised.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/29550003/so-red-bull-doesnt-actual....
Oh, and the rolling bib shorts into the jersey video... genius!
+1 on that!
That's the way I've been doing my t-shirts when I go on holiday for the last few years, takes up less space than folding and gives a nice tight bundle. I bought a couple of t-shirts when I was away recently and folded them like this on the shop counter.
I've recently started using fold and roll for most of my tshirts etc that go away into a drawer, avoids getting creases that get compressed by the weight of others above, and it's much easier to find the one you want when they're layed out visibly rather than in a stack. Keeping the bib shorts inside the jersey is a minor stroke of genius though.
So an American corporation “owns” the rights to an English word? What’s next, no more spin cycle for washing machines?
the whole , spinning, is only ‘spinning’ if you are ‘spinning’ with a trainer, trained in ‘spinning’ who’s paying the American corporation, for the privellege of calling his ‘spin class’ a ‘spin class’ thing, has been going on for many years. It’s nuts, but that seems to be the way of the world now. Soon, you won’t be able to go for a ‘shit’ without someone claiming a copyright infringement, if this carries on.
they could market a toilet under the brand name Pooloton which bland beautiful people could sit on in their vast apartments in front of the landscape windows, laying some massive cable without even their t-shirt getting sweaty.
No, in broad terms an American corporation has the right to use an English word to sell goods or services in specified classes in a particular geography for a limited period of time. I assume their registration doesn't cover washing machines. What I don't understand is why the owner of the "spinning" trademark is taking action for use of the word "spin", which they don't appear to have a registration for. Maybe this will turn out like the Roubaix debacle, where Specialized got heavy handed over a cafe using the name until Fuji bikes pointed out that actually Specialized didn't own that, they did.
Or the 4x4/little shit story from yesterday.
I wonder if the cyclist being deliberately run over with life changing injuries will generate the same level of outrage as the cyclist head butting the pedestrian?
It definitely won't. And it'll be more to do with gang warfare than hatred for cyclists.
Obligatory call for cars to be fitted with number plates to allow them to be traced when they leave the scene of an acc... oh wait! Not that having number plates is a requirement for car drivers anymore. I often see cars driving around London without plates fitted.
My first thought, too.
Hey - maybe we're looking at 'headbutting cyclist' incident all wrong... Maybe there was a previous conflict at a bridge club or something, rather than their being total strangers
My thought too. There was clearly a close passing of the cyclist & pedestrian. Did the cyclist have right of way? Did the pedestrian say something highly offensive to the cyclist? I have no idea but there is more to this than the video shows.
Tricky one, it might because it was a 17 year-old, but then maybe not because it was only a cyclist... or maybe it will because perpertrator was a yoof... or maybe not because he was in a car... or maybe it will because he fled the scene.