- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
5 comments
The problem with cycling organisations is that they are run by cyclists.
To clarify, the organisations are run by hobbyists for other hobbyists. When they come up against professional bodies / organisations, they quickly run out of ability / motivation, and capitulation is the order of the day.
That said, sometimes this is a good tactic. Locally to me, we lost a MOD based race circuit three years ago as the site chief didn't want bikes on the circuit any more. The list of excuses put forward as to why were long and varied.... the reality was the person / people in charge at the time, didn't want us any more.
The option at the time was to fight each reason individually and make unfeasible concessions to retain the circuit, or simply let it go. The thought process at the time was that this was a fight you couldn't currently win, and that doing so would only harden battle lines for the future... so it was let go.
This weekend, I return to that venue to race, as with the passing of time, the good work of both the local cycling community and relevant MOD personnel, a way forward has been found.
Ironically, the main man I'll be racing on the weekend will be Marcin. I am very much looking forward to experiencing the 'Marcin Smash' once more.
Congrats Marcin!
Marcin now has comp record at 10, 25, 50 (I think) and 100 miles. His 10-mile record of 16:35 will be particularly difficult to update as it was set on the now banned Hull course.
CTT folded like a cheap hand of cards, instead of waiting for the outcome and actually supporting cycling on all roads (other than Motorways) they have legitimised the 'it;s dangerous' bullshit'. Given the vph on that stretch, particularly on a sunday morning it's utterly ridiculous it was banned. I cycled it many years ago just on my todd, for events motorists generally know there's an event on and the onus absolutely has to be on the overtaking person to ensure it's safe to do so, no matter who or even what that is ahead.
Technically, It isn't banned. The district won't put TTs on the V718 - but it isn't banned. Highways England would LIKE it banned, but there was never any legislation passed to that effect. The CTT and District acceded to the request, I thibk specifically to prevent HE from getting their TRO enforced, which would - in pretty short order - have led to TROs being slapped on every DC course in the country
You've misunderstood, we know that cycling isn't banned, however CTT pre-empted what HE had proposed by banning organised time trials under their auspices. So any attempt on that particular course will not be recognised by them, so technically time-trialling is banned from that course for the purposes of recognition by CTT. Cycling for your own time trial or whatever riding you want to do isn't.
As I said, it was weak by CTT to cave in as they have.