Sir Bradley Wiggins’ former team manager Jonathan Vaughters says the British rider’s 2012 Tour de France victory is “blemished” by his use of normally banned drugs under a therapeutic use exemption and that Team Sky boss Sir Dave Brailsford must take the blame for “gaming the system.”
Vaughters managed Wiggins at Garmin-Slipstream in 2009, the year in which he finished a surprise fourth overall at the Tour de France. He would subsequently be elevated to third place overall after Lance Armstrong was disqualified for doping.
At the end of that season despite still being under contract, Wiggins would move to the new Team Sky as its marquee signing, something that still rankles with Vaughters, who described him as “the most gifted athlete I have ever worked with,” reports The Sunday Times.
The American, who is currently in the UK promoting his book One Way Ticket: Nine Lives on Two Wheels accused Brailsford, who was already working closely with Wiggins as performance director of British Cycling of “poisoning Brad’s mindset” ahead of the move.
“The situation with Brad was an absolute bully situation, with Dave and all those attorneys,” Vaughters said. “I don’t find that terribly forgivable.”
Following the Rio Olympics in 2016, where Wiggins won his fifth career Olympic gold medal, the Russia-based Fancy Bears hacking group revealed that the rider had been granted the powerful corticosteroid triamcinolone under therapeutic use exemptions on three occasions, including before the 2012 Tour de France.
Wiggins and Team Sky have claimed that the drug was used to treat the rider’s hay fever, but with triamcinolone helping reduce weight while retaining power, it has been abused by those looking to gain an illegal advantage.
Vaughters described the use of the TUEs as “gaming the system, adding, “It’s a blemished victory and that’s painful; Brad was gifted enough to win a Tour de France straight up.
“It will always be questioned, ‘Could he have won the Tour that year if he was 1kg heavier? Or could he have lost that 1kg another way?’
“Brad’s level of natural talent is enormous, but valid questions now hang over him. I think the people advising him did him a disservice.”
As to where blame should lie, he said:
“One thing I am trying to drive home is that we in management are responsible for giving these athletes the correct message and helping them come to the correct decisions.”
The issue of the TUEs to Wiggins, as well as the contents of the Jiffy Bag delivered to former British Cycling and Team Sky doctor Richard Freeman became the subject of a parliamentary enquiry as well as an investigation by UK Anti-doping which determined that there was insufficient evidence to establish that an anti-doping rule violation had been committed.
When asked if Brailsford, who remains team principal of what since last month has been Team Ineos, is a trustworthy figure to lead a team, Vaughters replied:
“Without doubt he learnt from the Wiggins decision. I doubt he would ever make that decision again.”
That's a flat out lie, he makes no secret of the fact that he finds it a PITA to go to court but if you report a driver and they choose to...
Software engineering is, to me, a closed book locked in a safe at the bottom of a coalmine, but surely it would be a pretty simple matter to slip...
The post by the Haringey Conservatives looks a bit counterproductive. The car picture looks all grey, dismal and smoggy whereas the picture with...
Don't criticise the authors of articles here, they get upset easily. I personally thought this article was great and definitely worth reading, and...
I wonder if the bag is loose and lets dirt in like their seatposts.
I've been using car shampoo for years. Much stronger and far far far cheaper than any other cleaner.
Funny how recycling centres prioritise car users. Car users are the ones killing the planet and think they can atone by recycling their junk. They...
Wind chill isn't prevented by wind proof clothing. Wind chill is prevented by insulation.
The huge amount of aluminium used in the glazing frames would obviate the supposed green benefits.
I don't know who those people are and I certainly don't know why you're so upset about them. What did they do to hurt you?